Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Neural Mechanisms of Remission in Children With ADHD

January 28, 2022 updated by: Qingjiu Cao, Peking University Sixth Hospital

Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Neural Mechanisms of Remission in Children With ADHD Treated With Methylphenidate or Atomoxetine

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder(ADHD) is highly prevalent among children and adolescents and often associated with poor long-term outcomes in adulthood. it is thus a serious public health problem. Methylphenidate(MPH) and Atomoxetine(ATX) are most frequently used for treating ADHD in many countries but the individual treatment response varies. Some patients present good response to either MPH or ATX with minimal or no symptoms left and optimal functioning(remission) after treatment, while others are poor responders to one of the two or even both. The underlying mechanism for the heterogenous responsiveness remains unknown. Thus we proposed to use multimodule magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) technology to explore the neural mechanisms of remission in children with ADHD treated with MPH or ATX.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

the main aim of the current study is to explore the mechanism of remission in children with ADHD treated by MPH or ATX. Baseline information including demographic information, clinical features including ADHD symptoms, cognitive assessments such as executive function, MRI scans including resting state functional MRI, structural MRI, and DTI would be acquired in each participant. after 8-12 weeks of treating with MPH or ATX, patients would be classified into subgroups of remitted and unremitted groups. all baseline tests would be acquired again at the end of the study. comparisons would be done to explore the remission mechanism induced by MPH or ATX

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

the ADHD group would be recruited by the clinic for child psychiatry in Peking University sixth hospital; while the healthy control would be recruited in community setting

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- clinical diagnosis of ADHD, based on K-SADS-PL medication naive aged 6-16

Exclusion Criteria:

- history of severe head injury (with coma) other severe physical problem or disease in nervous system intelligence quotient (IQ) < 80

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
healthy control
healthy controls, screened by K-SADS-PL
MPH induced Remission
patients show remission after 8-12 weeks of treatment with MPH
the drug would be prescribed to patients without any contraindication
Other Names:
  • Concerta
non responder to MPH
patients don't show remission after 8-12 weeks of treatment with MPH
the drug would be prescribed to patients without any contraindication
Other Names:
  • Concerta
ATX induced remission
patients show remission after 8-12 weeks of treatment with ATX
the drug would be prescribed to patients without any contraindication
Other Names:
  • Strattera
non responder to ATX
patients don't show remission after 8-12 weeks of treatment with ATX
the drug would be prescribed to patients without any contraindication
Other Names:
  • Strattera

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Swanson, Nolan and Pelham , Version Ⅳ Rating Scale (SNAP-Ⅳ)
Time Frame: 8 to 12 weeks
to define remission, using Swanson, Nolan and Pelham , Version Ⅳ Rating Scale (SNAP-Ⅳ), both in baseline and follow-up
8 to 12 weeks
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 8 to 12 weeks
to define remission, participants will assessed by CGI-I in follow-up, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-S) in baseline.
8 to 12 weeks
resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)
Time Frame: 8 to 12 weeks
participants undergo resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) scan both in baseline and follow-up, and the duration for each rs-fMRI is 8 minutes.
8 to 12 weeks
side effect assessment
Time Frame: 8 to 12 weeks
with clinical global impression scale
8 to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI)
Time Frame: 8 to 12 week
participants undergo structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) scan both in baseline and follow-up, and the duration for each sMRI is 5 minutes.
8 to 12 week
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)
Time Frame: 8 to 12 weeks
participants undergo DTI scan both in baseline and follow-up, and the duration for each sMRI is 10 minutes.
8 to 12 weeks
WEISS Functional Impairment Rating Scale-parent report (WFIRS-P)
Time Frame: 8 to 12 weeks
to assess the improvement of social function impairment in ADHD, participants will finish the WFIRS-P both in baseline and follow-up
8 to 12 weeks
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)
Time Frame: 8 to 12 weeks
to assess the improvement of ecological executive function in ADHD, participants will finish the BRIEF both in baseline and follow-up
8 to 12 weeks
The Cambridge Neuropsychological Tests Automated Battery(CANTAB)
Time Frame: 8 to 12 weeks
to assess the improvement of neuropsychological executive function in ADHD, participants will finish the executive functional test measured by CANTAB both in baseline and follow-up
8 to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Qingjiu Cao, PhD, Peking University Sixth Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

the data would be published first and not yet decided to share with other research groups

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on MPH

3
Subscribe