Comparison Between Two Techniques of Subthreshold Diode Laser Cyclophotocoagulation in Refractory Glaucoma

July 6, 2025 updated by: Mohamed Omar, Assiut University
The aim of this study is to assess the results of subliminal subthreshold transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma using the standard technique of 360 degree application and to compare the outcome with a modified technique both in terms of efficacy and safety.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Refractory glaucoma is glaucoma that doesn't respond favorably to surgical and/or medical treatment to lower intraocular pressure. It can include primary open angle glaucoma, primary angle closure glaucoma, neovascular glaucoma or silicone oil-induced glaucoma. Cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) is a form of cycloablation using laser to treat glaucoma. It involves ciliary body destruction by targeting the ciliary epithelium and stroma, resulting in a reduction in aqueous secretion and hence intraocular pressure. Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using a continuous diode laser has been a treatment option in advanced glaucoma cases with s¬¬uboptimal IOP control, for a long time. High treatment energy used by diode laser cyclophotocoagulation was argued to be associated with increased frequency of serious complications such as vision loss, hypotony, and phthisis. These concerns necessitate modulation of the parameters of laser treatment used.

Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC), which is a variation of conventional continuous-wave CPC, has emerged as an attractive alternative for the treatment of many types of glaucoma. It breaks the continuous wave laser into multiple short and repetitive pulses that allow the tissue to cool down between applications, thus reducing thermal damage. This strategy delivers very short energy pulses followed by rest periods, which is known as "duty cycle" and is defined as the ratio of time that a laser is delivering energy vs resting (ON/OFF). For this procedure, an infrared diode laser is used to stimulate the ciliary body structures and the uveoscleral pathway. This way it reduces the production of the aqueous humour and facilitates the uveoscleral outflow, with IOP reduction as a final effect.

Despite promising results, only few clinical studies are published on MP-TSCPC and most of them are retrospective studies refer to patients having previous continuous wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. Moreover, Several parameters and protocols have been studied in other reports in an attempt to refine the standard technique aiming to improve the outcomes without increasing the adverse effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71515
        • Assiut University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with refractory glaucoma (IOP > 21 mmHg unresponsive to maximally tolerated antiglaucoma medications, previously failed surgical treatment, or both)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular inflammation.
  • Ocular infection.
  • Recent ocular surgery in the study eye in the 2 months prior to enrolment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group A the standard technique
The tip of the probe was moved in a "painting" motion along the upper and lower hemispheres over pars plana, 3 mm behind the limbus, avoiding the 3 and 9 o'clock positions.
The probe was moved over each hemisphere for 120 seconds (a total of 240 seconds). Total energy = 2.5 x 0.313 x 240 = 187.8 J
Active Comparator: Group B a modified technique
The probe tip was moved for 2 mm perpendicular to a line 3 mm parallel to the cornea, aiming to cover the largest circumference of the ciliary body area.
The probe was moved over 3 quadrants for 80 seconds for each quadrant (a total of 240 seconds). Total energy = 2.5 x 0.313 x 240 = 187.8 J

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IOP reduction success rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Success rate is defined as achieving an IOP between 5 and 21 mmHg or at least a 20% reduction in IOP at the final follow up with or without IOP lowering medications
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CTTSDLCRG

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractory Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on standard technique

Subscribe