Optimal High CPAP Pressures in Preterm Neonates Post-extubation

January 28, 2022 updated by: Amit Mukerji, McMaster Children's Hospital

Optimal High CPAP Pressures in Preterm Neonates Post-extubation: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial

Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm neonates has traditionally been limited to between 5-8 cmH2O. In recent years, use of CPAP pressures ≥9 cmH2O is becoming more common in neonates with evolving chronic lung disease, in lieu of other non-invasive modes or invasive mechanical ventilation. A particular knowledge gap in the current literature is the choice of the level of pressure level when using High CPAP as a post-extubation support mode. In this study, we will comparatively evaluate the short-term impact of two different high CPAP pressures when used as a post-extubation support mode in preterm neonates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm neonates has traditionally been limited to between 5-8 cmH2O. In recent years, use of CPAP pressures ≥9 cmH2O is becoming more common in neonates with evolving chronic lung disease, in lieu of other non-invasive modes or invasive mechanical ventilation. However, there are limited data on the effectiveness and safety of this mode.

A particular knowledge gap in the current literature is the choice of the level of pressure level when using High CPAP as a post-extubation support mode. While it could be argued that the initial High CPAP pressure post-extubation should be somewhat higher than the pre-extubation mean airway pressure (Paw), there remain concerns of potential complications as well as uncertainty around degree of leak and resulting effectiveness. On the other hand, a suboptimal post-extubation High CPAP level may lead to atelectasis and contribute towards extubation failure, potentially prolonging invasive ventilation and associated risks. As such, research towards identification of the optimal High CPAP level post-extubation from high invasive ventilation pressures is warranted.

Objective: To comparatively evaluate the short-term impact of two different high CPAP pressures when used as a post-extubation support mode in preterm neonates.

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that babies extubated from invasive mechanical ventilation with a mean Paw between 9-15 cmH2O will demonstrate better physiological and clinical parameters when using High CPAP+2 cmH2O vs equivalent CPAP levels.

Methods: Design - This will be a prospective, single-centre, randomized cross-over study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4K1
        • McMaster Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 week to 8 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational age <29 weeks; chronological age >7 days; post-menstrual age <37 weeks; extubation from invasive ventilation with measured mean airway pressure 9-15 cmH2O

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any congenital or genetic/chromosomal abnormality

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Higher CPAP
CPAP level will be 2 cmH2O higher than pre-extubation measured mean airway pressure
The level of continuous distending pressure (or positive end-expiratory pressure) chosen on CPAP
Active Comparator: Equivalent CPAP
CPAP level will be equal to the pre-extubation measured mean airway pressure
The level of continuous distending pressure (or positive end-expiratory pressure) chosen on CPAP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Edi
Time Frame: 60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
The peak electrical diaphragmatic activity - a surrogate for work of breathing to generate tidal volume
60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minimum EDi
Time Frame: 60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
The minimum eelectrical diaphragmatic activity - a surrogate for work of breathing to maintain functional residual capacity
60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
Regional cerebral perfusion
Time Frame: 60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
The cerebral tissue extraction of oxygen - determined by near infra-red spectroscopy
60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
Pressure level - Ventilator
Time Frame: 60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
Pressure level as measured by the ventilator
60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
Pressure level - Interface
Time Frame: 60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
Pressure level at measured at the nasal interface used to deliver CPAP
60 min following each CPAP level - assessed over 10 min
Work of breathing score
Time Frame: Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
Using Silverman Scoring
Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
Heart Rate
Time Frame: Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
From cardiorespiratory monitoring
Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
From cardiorespiratory monitoring
Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
Transcutaneous CO2 level
Time Frame: Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
From bedside transcutaneous CO2 monitoring
Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
FiO2 level
Time Frame: Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
Fractional inspired oxygen level, as determined by clinical and inputted into ventilator
Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level, assessed every 10 min
Number of bradycardic episodes <80 bpm
Time Frame: Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level
as above
Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level
Proportion of duration with SpO2 <90%
Time Frame: Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level
duration of time where the patient's SpO2 is less than 90%
Over entire duration (70 min) at each CPAP level

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amit Mukerji, MD, Associate Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 15, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preterm Birth

Clinical Trials on CPAP level

Subscribe