Pilate Mat Exercise Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain (MET-LBP)

March 21, 2022 updated by: Hager Nazieh Mohamed Hekal, Cairo University
to investigate the effect of pilat mat exercise versus MET on chronic non specific LBP:Randomized controlled trial

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Low back pain (LBP) affects almost everyone at least once per life. Hence,it has been considered one of the most common musculoskeletal problems.The Pilates Method starts by strengthening the core, which is achieved by coordinating breathing with movement. Muscle energy technique is an associate degree of osteopathic manipulation methodology. The muscles of patients were used, on request, to type a singular controlled position, in a very specific direction, and against a distinctly executed therapist-applied counterforce.pilate mat exercise and muscle energy technique play a major role in treatment of patients with chronic non specific LBP so this trial will be conducted to investigate the effect of pilat mat exercise versus MET on chronic non specific LBP:

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

87

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: hager na hekal, PHD student
  • Phone Number: 00201016549132
  • Email: hager_in@yahoo.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Seventyeight Subjects will be selected from both genders, with age above 18 years.
  • Normal body mass index (BMI) will be included.
  • Participants diagnosed with chronic nonspecific LBP.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participants will be excluded if they had one of the following criteria:
  • Patient with previous back surgery, lumbar disc herniation, spinal deformities.
  • Neuromusculoskeletal problems as hip arthrodesis or arthroplasty and spondylolisthesis.
  • History of Cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis
  • Pregnant women and Osteoprosis.
  • Leg length discrepancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: pilate group
will receive pilate exercise(1- bridging 2- shoulder bridge 3- front support 4- spine stretch forward 5- spine twist) and standard treatment (stretch hamstring , stretch lower back , strength abdominal muscles and electrical heat pad) for 12 sessions(3 sessions/week) over a period of four weeks.
pilate group:1- bridging 2- shoulder bridge 3- front support 4- spine stretch forward 5- spine twist plus standard treatment(stretch hamstring -stretch lower back - strength abdominal muscles - electrical heat pad)
Experimental: MET
will receiveMET treatment for hamstring and erector spinae and standard treatment(stretch hamstring , stretch lower back , strength abdominal muscles and electrical heat pad) for 12 sessions (3 sessions/week)over a period of four weeks.
Will receive MET for hamstring and erectorspinae plus standard treatment
Active Comparator: control group
will receive standard treatment(stretch hamstring , stretch lower back , strength abdominal muscles and electrical heat pad) only for 12 sessions (3 sessions/week) over a period of four weeks.
electrical heat pad - stretch hamstring - stretch lower back muscles - stregth abdominal muscles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks for each group
using visual analogue scale.each patient willbe instructed to rate the current level of pain by placing (X) sign across the horizontal VAS line. The distance in millimeters from the lower limit was measured using a ruler. VAS will be assessed before and after the treatment program.as 1:2 mild , 3:6moderate and 7:10 sever pain.
up to 4 weeks for each group
functional disability
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks for each group
using ronald morris questioneer.The RMDQ is scored by adding up the number of items the patient has ticked. Scores can vary between 0-24. Greater levels of disability are reflected by higher scores
up to 4 weeks for each group
ROM
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks for each group

using BROMII.Use the two universal inclinometers to make flexion/extension measurements. Measurements with the universal inclinometer need to be with the patient in an upright position.

  1. Palpate and mark S1 and T12. Mark on bare skin when possible. This avoids the marks moving with the patient's clothing (Fig.2)
  2. Center the two inclinometers over the palpation marks and zero with your finger by spinning the dial (zero would then be at the bottom of the inclinometer).
  3. Have the patient flex forward as far as possible (Fig. 3). Note the reading on each inclinometer.
  4. The reading on the upper inclinometer is total lumbar flexion. The reading on the lower inclinometer is sacral flexion. The difference between the reading at S1 and T12 is true lumbar flexion.
  5. Repeat flexion protocol for extension having the patient extend back for full extension instead of flexing forward
up to 4 weeks for each group
flexibility
Time Frame: upto 4 weeks for each group
using V sit and reach test.The test is done twice with a short break in between . Scoring: Zero point is at the level of feet. (We note negative values towards our body and positive values outward from our body.) The best trial is recorded in centimeters by best score
upto 4 weeks for each group

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: hager hekal, PHD student, Faculty of physical therapy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

March 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/002135

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on pilate mat exercise will be performed

3
Subscribe