Prescription-grade Crystalline Glucosamine Sulfate Therapy in Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis

February 16, 2022 updated by: fioravanti antonella, University of Siena

Erosive Osteoarthritis of the Hand: Efficacy of Prescription-grade Crystalline Glucosamine Sulfate as an add-on Therapy to Conventional Treatments

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of prescription-grade Crystalline Glucosamine Sulfate (pCGS), as an add-on treatment to conventional therapy, compared to usual therapy alone, in patients with erosive osteoarthritis of the hand (EHOA).

This is a 6-months retrospective study including patients with concomitant gonarthrosis and EHOA, defined as the presence of central erosion in at least two interphalangeal joints. Eligibility criteria are symptoms duration for at least 3 months, with a global hand pain score ≥40 mm on a 0-100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) score ≥6. The participants are stratified into two groups based on whether or not pCGS, at the daily dose of 1500 mg, was added to the conventional therapy for hand osteoarthritis (HOA). The latter consists of education and training in ergonomic principles, exercise and the use on-demand of acetaminophen or oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients are evaluated at baseline, after 3 and 6 months. Primary outcome measures are the change from baseline to month 6 in VAS and in FIHOA score. Secondary outcomes are duration of morning stiffness, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), medical outcomes study 36-item short form (SF-36), symptomatic drugs consumption and percentage of treatment responders, according to the OMERACT/OARSI criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

123

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Siena, Italy, 53100
        • Rheumatology Unit Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants are stratified into two groups (pCGS Group and Control Group) based on whether or not prescription-grade crystalline GS treatment, prescribed for the actually approved indication of knee OA, was added to the conventional therapy. This stratification is based on regrouping patients with similar clinical characteristics at baseline.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis, defined as the presence of the classical central erosion in at least two interphalangeal joints
  • Treatment for at least 6 consecutive months with prescription-grade crystalline GS at the daily dose of 1500 mg in addition to the conventional therapy or with usual care alone.
  • Symptoms duration for at least 3 months defined as global hand pain score superior to 40 mm on a 0-100 VAS and a FIHOA score of at least 6.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical history of any inflammatory joint disease, septic arthritis, previous articular fracture of the concerned joints, or the presence of any other rheumatic diseases that could cause secondary OA, such as hemochromatosis
  • Concomitant therapy with SYSADOAs, other than pCGS, steroids by any route of administration and intra-articular injection of any joint with hyaluronic acid during the previous 6 months
  • Concomitant treatment with intra-muscular or intra-venous bisphosphonates in the previous 6 months
  • Contraindications or special warnings for pCGS presented in the data sheet.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Prescription-grade Crystalline Glucosamine Sulfate Group (pCGS Group)
pCGS Group includes patients treated with pCGS (Dona®, VIATRIS), in sachets of powder for oral solution, at the dose of 1500 mg glucosamine sulfate once daily, for a total period of 6 consecutive months according to the approved indication for knee OA, in addition to conventional therapy for HOA.
Treatment for at least 6 months with prescription-grade crystalline Glucosamine Sulfate in addition to conventional treatment
Other Names:
  • Acetaminophen
  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Control Group
Control Group includes patients treated with conventional therapy alone for at least 6 consecutive months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between the two groups in the change of the patient's assessment of global hand pain on a 0- 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Basal time; three months; six months
0-100 mm scale with 0 representing the absence of pain
Basal time; three months; six months
Difference between the two groups in the change of the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) score
Time Frame: Basal time; three months; six months
The FIHOA score represents a quantitative measure of functional disability of the hands; it contains 10 items and is an investigator-administered questionnaire. Patients are asked to answer each item using a four-point Likert scale: 0 = possible without difficulty, 1 = possible with slight difficulty, 2 = possible with considerable difficulty, 3 = impossible; the range of scores is 0-30 and the highest values indicate the worst functionality. The validate Italian version of FIHOA is used for the present study
Basal time; three months; six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between the two groups in the change in the duration of morning stiffness
Time Frame: Basal time; three months; six months
VAS stiffness is measured in minutes and based on the self-report of patients
Basal time; three months; six months
Difference between the two groups in the change of HAQ
Time Frame: Basal time; three months; six months
HAQ is a self administered questionnaire developed to measure disability consisting of 8 sections: dressing arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities and ranging from 0 to 3 with a higher score corresponding to worse disability
Basal time; three months; six months
Difference between the two groups in the change of SF-36
Time Frame: Basal time; three months; six months
SF-36 is a widely used measure of health and wellbeing, including two main domains, mental and physical component summary (MCS and PCS respectively), that investigates 8 different areas of perceived health, such as physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role and mental health. Scores range from "0 to 100" where "0" indicates the worst condition and "100" indicates the best possible condition
Basal time; three months; six months
NSAIDs and/or acetaminophen consumption
Time Frame: Basal time; three months; six months
The acetaminophen and NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors consumption was calculated asking the patients at each visit the number of tablets taken weekly.
Basal time; three months; six months
OMERACT/OARSI criteria responders
Time Frame: Basal time; three months; six months
percentage of treatment responders at 3 and 6 months, according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) criteria
Basal time; three months; six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erosive Osteoarthritis of the Hand

Clinical Trials on Glucosamine Sulfate

3
Subscribe