FMBI With War-affected Families

March 12, 2025 updated by: University of Minnesota

Intergenerational Trauma in War-affected Families: Promoting Adolescent Adjustment Through a Family Mindfulness-based Intervention

This study has two central research questions: 1) Is implementing a family mindfulness-based intervention with war-affected immigrant families through community based participatory research methods feasible?; and 2) Does the intervention demonstrate preliminary improvements in the social and behavioral health of war-affected caregivers and youth by addressing patterns of behavior that potentiate intergenerational trauma? The objective in the proposed study is to use Community Based Participatory Research strategies to test the feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness-based intervention for Karen refugee families living post-resettlement in the United States. A key focus in this phase of the pilot will be intervention adaptation and establishing fidelity monitoring and quality improvement procedures through which the PI and community health worker interventionists are trained and evaluated in the delivery of the intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intergenerational trauma is a major public health problem impacting war-affected families. The investigators' specific research contribution will test the feasibility of a 7-week family mindfulness-based intervention addressing key mechanisms central to the health of war-affected families. The significance of this contribution is tied to the conceptual understanding that caregivers uniquely influence the ways in which their children process trauma, experience stressful events, and thrive socially, behaviorally and physically. The responses of youth, in turn, affect the well-being of their parents. Left unaddressed, intergenerational trauma will continue to negatively impact the health and life course of immigrant youth and families. Collectively, this contributes to: higher burden of unaddressed mental and physical health disturbances in caregivers and youth; disruptions in family systems and community structures that negatively impact educational achievement and other indicators of youth adjustment; and increased exposure to familial and community violence. If a mindfulness-based intervention delivered directly to war-affected families in their homes can demonstrate improvements in the behavioral and social health effects of war trauma experienced by caregivers and their youth, then this study has the potential to offer a novel, effective approach to disrupting the generational impacts of war on war-affected families. The study will engage mothers, fathers, and youth to address intergenerational trauma fully. The investigators will establish plans for collaborative dissemination with WellShare International in phase I of the Clinical Translational Research Service pilot award, including academic dissemination (presentation and publication) as well as dissemination of results among key stakeholders and community members.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult inclusion criteria:

    • Above the age of 18
    • Karen refugees resettled to the United States greater than one year prior to enrollment
    • Caregiving responsibility for at least one child between the ages of 11 and 18
    • Reported primary or secondary torture or war trauma exposure, based on assessments conducted during UMN IRB STUDY00000729
    • Participation in UMN IRB STUDY00000729 and having agreed to be contacted for future research
  • Youth inclusion criteria:

    • Ages 11 to 18
    • Living in the home with the primary caregivers
    • Considered a dependent of the primary caregivers (still in high school or transitioning from school to workforce, not married and/or raising their own children - will take individual youth circumstances into consideration individually to make a determination of dependence)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported or study team observed severe or unstable mental or physical illness such as acute psychosis, presence or risk of safety concerns, and/or a physical disability or illness, which prevents the potential participant from engaging in the study activities. Youth will be excluded if screening is positive for PTSD. Caregivers will not be excluded if mental health screening is positive for PTSD/severe depression.
  • Nonbiological caregiving relationships with child
  • If one member of the family declines to participate in the initial enrollment, the family will be excluded. If the randomly selected index youth declines to participate, we will open enrollment to other youth in the family that meet the inclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phase 2 Youth
One randomly selected index youth per participating Karen family. Community health worker interventionists (CHWI) will deliver 7 weeks of home-based intervention with optional post-intervention focus groups to examine the feasibility of the community-based participatory research approach and intervention delivery by CHWIs.
A 6 session group-based intervention targeting adolescent mindfulness. The adapted and merged intervention will be delivered to individual families (home-based) in twice-weekly sessions over a 7-week period by two community health worker interventionists.
Experimental: Phase 2 Caregivers/Adults
Maternal and paternal caregivers (if present) of participating Karen family. Community health worker interventionists (CHWI) will deliver 7 weeks of home-based intervention with optional post-intervention focus groups to examine the feasibility of the community-based participatory research approach and intervention delivery by CHWIs.
A 14 session group-based mindful parenting intervention originally developed to increase emotion regulation among military caregivers with young children and improve youth adjustment. The adapted and merged intervention will be delivered to individual families (home-based) in twice-weekly sessions over a 7-week period by two community health worker interventionists.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Youth Adjustment
Time Frame: 3 months
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ I/S). A 25-item youth behavioral screening questionnaire, Total difficulties score: generated by summing scores from all the scales except prosocial scale, Range 0-40. Higher score, higher adjustment challenges
3 months
Mindfulness
Time Frame: 3 months

Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). A 12-item assessment of mindfulness as a single construct. Items 2, 6, and 7 reverse-scored. After reversals, sum values for items 1-12. Sum of all values reflect greater mindful qualities.

The range of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) is 12-48. It is a 12-item scale where each item is rated on a 1-4 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness.

3 months
Youth Trauma History, PTSD Screening
Time Frame: 3 months

UCLA Brief Screen for Child/Adolescent Trauma and PTSD (UCLA-B). A 11-item (+2 open ended) evaluation of trauma history and PTSD symptoms for identifying at-risk cases. A cutoff score of 35 is highly sensitive and specific for detecting a diagnosis of PTSD. Higher score, higher burden of PTSD symptoms

UCLA brief trauma screen: This was a screening tool used to establish the eligibility of youth participants. This was not included in the analysis.

Each item on the scale is rated on a 0-4 scale, with higher scores signifying greater symptom severity, range 0-44. The FACES instrument is not scored based on a range, as described.

3 months
Emotion Regulation
Time Frame: 3 months

Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire (ERSQ). A 27-item assessment of emotion regulation skills described in the ART model. Calculated mean of all questions. Higher score indicates better Emotion Regulation.

The Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire (ERSQ) is a 27 item scale that uses a 5-point Likert scale for each item, 0 (not at all) to 4 (almost always), with a total score range of 0-108.

3 months
Parent Mental Health Distress
Time Frame: 3 months

Karen Mental Health Screener - Brief (KMHS-B). 5-item measure developed to screen for mental distress associated with MDD and PTSD. Possible score ranges for five items 0-15. For clinical use, clinical cut score of 4.

Higher score, higher burden of PTSD symptoms. Used cut score to refer

3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Health Status
Time Frame: 3 months
Cohen-Hoberman Inventory of Physical Symptoms (CHIPS). A 33-item assessment of perceived burden from physical symptoms. Total score generated by summing items. Range 0-132. Higher score, higher burden of physical symptoms
3 months
Family Functioning
Time Frame: 3 months

Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV (FACES). A 42-item assessment of cohesion and flexibility. Dividing the average of the balanced scales (Cohesion and Flexibility) by the average of the unbalanced scales (Rigid, Enmeshed, Chaotic and Rigid). The higher the ratio score the more balanced the family system.

Each item on the scale is rated on a 0-4 scale, with higher scores signifying greater symptom severity, range 0-44. The FACES instrument is not scored based on a range, as described.

3 months
Emotion Regulation
Time Frame: 3 months

Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire (ERSQ). A 27-item assessment of emotion regulation skills described in the ART model.

ESRQ - 27 items, each scored 0-4, range 0-108, higher scores mean higher emotion regulation. Total scores used, no subscales. Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) has a range of scores from 12 to 48, each of the 12 items is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (from "Rarely/Not at all" to "Almost Always") with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness.

3 months
Mindfulness
Time Frame: 3 months

Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale- Revised (CAMS-R). A 12-item assessment of mindfulness as a single construct. Items 2, 6, and 7 reverse-scored. After reversals, sum values for items 1-12. Sum of all values reflect greater mindful qualities.

ESRQ - 27 items, each scored 0-4, range 0-108, higher scores mean higher emotion regulation. Total scores used, no subscales. Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) has a range of scores from 12 to 48, each of the 12 items is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (from "Rarely/Not at all" to "Almost Always") with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness.

3 months
Physical Symptom Burden
Time Frame: 3 months
Cohen-Hoberman Inventory of Physical Symptoms (CHIPS). A 33-item assessment of perceived burden from physical symptoms. Total score generated by summing items. Range 0-132. Higher score, higher burden of physical symptoms
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Hoffman, PHD, MPH, MSN, RN, University of Minnesota School of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on War-Related Trauma

Clinical Trials on Learning to BREATHE

Subscribe