Mental Health Intervention Research in At-Risk Adolescents

May 16, 2025 updated by: Colorado State University
The goal of the proposed research is to support adolescent health through providing inclusive evidence-based programming that is in line with community needs. Specifically, the investigators aim to: 1) investigate the effects of mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) on adolescent mental health, 2) identify underlying mechanisms (e.g., engagement, stress physiology, emotion regulation) of MBI for adolescent health and wellbeing 3) identify facilitators and barriers of engagement in MBI for community adolescents.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Experiencing mental health problems during adolescence is associated with symptom worsening and recurrence later in life, as well as poorer physical health and increased risk for preventable chronic diseases. Mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) has been shown to support key skills and capacities that may protect against mental health challenges, including emotion regulation and stress physiology. Yet, MBI effects on health and wellbeing outcomes in adolescents are generally small and inconsistent across studies. This research will provide an opportunity for testing MBI in community adolescent samples, with a focus on clarifying underlying mechanisms and understanding subjective facilitators and barriers to engagement in MBI is critical.

In research with adolescents, L2B has been associated with improvements in emotion regulation and indicators of mental and physical wellbeing. In our previous work, the investigators delivered L2B as part of a broader healthy lifestyle program for families, and it was feasible and acceptable to adolescent participants. Delivering L2B is also consistent with the results of the 2020 Larimer County Needs Assessment, in which 48% of respondents indicated a need for more resources to support mental health and stress management for youth. Thus, given the solid evidence base for the benefits of L2B for adolescents, our experience delivering L2B to Northern Colorado teens in a previous phase of this community-engaged work, and the identified community need for inclusive, evidence-based mental health prevention programming for adolescents, the investigators will begin delivering L2B and evaluating the program's benefits on adolescent health and wellbeing.

The capacity of mindfulness, or present-centered, nonjudgmental attention, has also been associated with fewer mental health concerns in adolescents. However, meta-analyses and recent large-scale randomized controlled trials indicate that MBI does not always produce the desired outcomes in adolescents. This heterogeneity of findings indicates the need for mechanistic studies that closely examine the processes occurring during and between intervention sessions. This project both addresses an identified community need (inclusive mental health programming for adolescents) and will advance our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie MBI efficacy for supporting youth mental health in nonclinical samples.

This study will be a single-arm trial of an MBI utilizing a repeated measures assessment design. The single-arm nature keeps the project aligned with our goal of meeting community needs, and the multiple assessment timepoints (baseline, weekly across the 6-week intervention, follow-up) allows us to examine temporal ordering of changes in hypothesized mechanisms. With this project the investigators seek to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of mindfulness-based intervention effectiveness for adolescent health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80523
        • Colorado State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1) between the ages of 12-18 years old,

- 2) Reside in Larimer County or the surrounding area.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adolescents will not take part in the program if they demonstrate active suicidal ideation and/or behavior.
  • Adolescents will not take part in the program and/or research activities if they have a medical and/or psychological/behavioral condition that, in the opinion of the research team, could interfere with safety for themselves or others or interfere with the capability of the youth or other participants to potentially benefit from the program (e.g., severe emotional-behavioral disturbance, inability to follow facilitator directions) .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness-based intervention
6 week group mindfulness-based intervention
Learning 2 BREATHE (L2B) is an empirically-supported, manualized mindfulness-based group program (Broderick, 2021). Participants attend 6 sessions of approximately 1.5 hours per session. "BREATHE" is an acronym: Body, Reflections, Emotions, Attention, Tenderness, Habits, Empowerment; each week's lesson is centered around one of the letters (week 1 encompasses both Body and the overall theme of the sessions, Empowerment). Sample activities of L2B include psycho-education on emotion and self-regulation, body scanning, sitting meditation, non-aerobic yoga, and walking meditation, designed to promote moment-to-moment awareness of mind-body experiences. In between sessions, participants are encouraged to practice brief mindfulness skills in their daily lives and to complete the "homework" assignments, such as an audio-guided body scan. Participants will have access to home-practice audio-recordings and will be queried about their completion of home-practice assignments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotion Regulation - Adolescent Report
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adolescent self-report on Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form; The scale yields a sum score from 0-90 on 18 items. Higher scores indicate more difficulties in emotion regulation
6 weeks
Emotion Regulation - Parent Report
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Parent self-report on Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Parent Version; The scale yields a sum score from 0-145 on 29 items. Higher scores indicate more difficulties in emotion regulation
6 weeks
Mindfulness - Attention
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adolescent self report on the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale; The scale yields a sum score from 0-75 on 15 items, and then an average will be taken. Higher scores reflect higher levels of dispositional mindfulness.
6 weeks
Mindfulness - Self Compassion
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adolescent self report on the Self Compassion Scale - Short Form; The scale yields a sum score from 0-60 on 12 items, and then an average will be taken. Higher scores reflect higher levels of self compassion.
6 weeks
Mindfulness - Behavioral Task
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adolescent will complete the Breath Counting Task, a 20-minute computer-administered objective measure of mindfulness. In the task, participants are required to count their breaths in cycles of nine, indicating each breath with a button press. Counting accuracy is calculated as 100% - (# of incorrect ongoing 9-counts + # of self-caught miscounts)/(# of ongoing 9-counts + # of self-caught miscounts).
6 weeks
Stress Reactivity - Respiratory Sinus Arrythmia
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Respiratory changes will be measured measured by recording the rate and depth of the breathing cycle using a pneumograph transducer fastened around the center of the chest; this transducer measures changes in chest expansion and contraction. This data will be collected throughout a brief baseline period, a stressor task (the Trier Social Stress Task), and a recovery period.
6 weeks
Stress Reactivity - Skin Conductance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Skin conductance level will be measured by attaching two electrodes to the participant's fingertips (on the index and middle finger of the left hand). This data will be collected throughout a brief baseline period, a stressor task (the Trier Social Stress Task), and a recovery period.
6 weeks
Stress Reactivity - Heart Rate
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Electrocardiogram (ECG) will be used to record the electrical signal of the heart using electrodes on both legs above the ankle both and above the right wrist. This will be collected throughout a brief baseline period, a stressor task (the Trier Social Stress Task), and a recovery period.
6 weeks
Stress Reactivity - Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A Dinamap Pro will be used to measure systolic and diastolic blood pressure. This will be collected throughout a brief baseline period, a stressor task (the Trier Social Stress Task), and a recovery period.
6 weeks
Mental health - Anxiety
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self report on Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Emotional Distress Scale - Anxiety. The scale produces a sum score of 13 to 65 with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety.
6 weeks
Mental health - Depression
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self report on Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Emotional Distress Scale - Depression. The scale produces a sum score of 14 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compassion for others
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self report on Compassion Scale. The scale yields a sum score from 5-80 with higher scores indicating more compassion for others
6 weeks
Stress appraisal
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self report on the Perceived Stress Scale. The scale yields sum scores on the PSS from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
6 weeks
Social Media Use
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self report on the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. The total score of Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale ranges from 6-30, with higher scores indicating more addictive tendencies in social media use.
6 weeks
Eating behavior
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self report on the Reward Based Eating Drive Scale. Items are summed for a total score between 5 and 45, with higher scores indicating more tendency toward reward-based eating.
6 weeks
Objectified Body Consciousness
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Self report on the Body Surveillance and Body Shame subscales of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale. Each scale contains 8 items. A sum score between 7 and 112 will be calculated, with higher scores indicating higher body consciousness.
6 weeks
Intervention liking and acceptability
Time Frame: 6 week follow up only
Author-developed self report questions. Items will be on a scale of 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater liking of the program. Total possible scores will range from 5 to 25.
6 week follow up only
Engagement - Cognitive Behavioral
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adolescents will report on the 16-item Activity Engagement Scale. Sum scores are derived, with possible scores from 5 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater engagement.
6 weeks
Engagement - Value
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adolescents will complete the 7-item value subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. Scores range from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicating more value motivation.
6 weeks
Engagement - Interest
Time Frame: 6 weeks

Adolescents will complete the 7-item value subscale and the 7-item interest subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. Scores range from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicating more interest motivation.

the 8-item Teacher and Classmate Support Scale. They will also report on their home practice of mindfulness and complete the 15-item Applied Mindfulness Process Scale, which assesses the degree to which participants are applying mindfulness as discussed/trained in the intervention sessions. Observational assessments of engagement will be completed by outside raters.

6 weeks
Engagement - Teacher and Classmate Support
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adolescents will complete the 8-item Teacher and Classmate Support Scale. A sum score between 5 and 40 is derived, with higher scores indicative of more perceived support.
6 weeks
Engagement - Mindfulness
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adolescents will complete the 15-item Applied Mindfulness Process Scale, which assesses the degree to which participants are applying mindfulness as discussed/trained in the program. A sum all 15 items yields score ranging from 0-60, with higher scores indicating more application of mindfulness
6 weeks
Engagement - Observational
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Independent observers will code videotaped sessions of mindfulness training using the Engagement Observation Protocol. Scores range from 3 to 15, with higher scores indicating more engagement.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lauren Shomaker, Ph.D., Colorado State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4219

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Wellness 1

Clinical Trials on Learning to BREATHE

Subscribe