The Moving 2 Mindful (M2M) Study: Mindfulness Group + Ecological Momentary Intervention (M2M)

June 21, 2023 updated by: Colorado State University

Decreasing Stress and Anxiety in Adolescents From High-Conflict Homes: Testing a Mindfulness Group + Ecological Momentary Intervention

This study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of Learning to BREATHE (a mindfulness intervention for adolescents) plus an ecological momentary intervention (Learning to Breathe Plus), and will examine the extent to which mindfulness reduces dysregulated stress physiology, perceived stress, and anxiety in adolescents from high conflict homes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adolescents from homes with interparental conflict will be randomly assigned to Learning to BREATHE Plus (the standard group program designed to increase mindfulness, plus a multi-method adaptive intervention that will be comprised of an ecological momentary intervention and online library of mindfulness practices) or to a health and wellness active control condition to determine feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of Learning to BREATHE Plus.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80525
        • Colorado State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • two parents in the home
  • an adolescent who is between 14 and 18 years of age
  • marital distress and/or problematic interparental conflict (based on parent or youth reports)
  • youth reports of stress or anxiety

Exclusion Criteria:

  • two parents in the home, but they are pursuing legal divorce or separation
  • parents are not willing to receive marital education/support
  • adolescents are severely clinically depressed or report suicidal ideation at baseline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Learning to BREATHE Plus
It is a 6-week manualized program; each meeting is 1.5 hours, for a total of 9 contact hours. It will be administered in a classroom at Colorado State University. Adolescents will be sent ecological momentary intervention text messages several times a day (with reminders, encouragement, and guides to practice mindfulness), and also have access to an on demand online library of mindfulness resources.
Activities include psycho-education about stress and emotion regulation, and practices of body scanning, non-aerobic yoga, and meditation, which are designed to cultivate and provide opportunities to practice present-focused, non-judgmental attention.
Active Comparator: Health and wellness
It is a 6-week program; each meeting is 1.5 hours, for a total of 9 contact hours. It will be administered in a classroom at Colorado State University.
The Health Education Wellness Program (modeled after Hey Durham) (Bravender, 2005) will provide didactic information on substance use, nutrition/body image, stress management, exercise, and signs of depression/suicide.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safe implementation
Time Frame: Across 8-week intervention period
Implementation without increase in symptomatology
Across 8-week intervention period
Recruitment of target sample size
Time Frame: Across 8-week intervention period
Successful recruitment of 38 families (114 individuals)
Across 8-week intervention period
Enrollment of percent eligible
Time Frame: Across 8-week intervention period
Enrolling a high percent of eligible families to the study/intervention
Across 8-week intervention period
Retention to interventions
Time Frame: Across 8-week intervention period
A high proportion of adolescents will attend 4/6 sessions
Across 8-week intervention period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of implementation
Time Frame: Across 8-week intervention period
Successful implementation and retention to study (i.e., fidelity of intervention delivery >=80%, <=5% reports of not receiving ecological momentary intervention from adolescents, >=90% attendance at 4/6 sessions, >= retainment at post-group and follow-up)
Across 8-week intervention period
Acceptability of interventions
Time Frame: Across 8-week intervention period
Rated by participants
Across 8-week intervention period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mindfulness, self-reported
Time Frame: Up to 3 months of follow-up
Adolescents reported mindfulness (Mindfulness Awareness and Attention Scale, Adolescent Version; Brown, West, Loverich, & Biegel, 2011). There are 14 items on this scale, each answered on a scale from 1 (almost always) to 6 (almost never). Answer across 14 items are averaged such that higher scores indicate higher trait mindfulness (minimum = 1; maximum = 6).
Up to 3 months of follow-up
Mindfulness, observed
Time Frame: Up to 3 months of follow-up
Adolescents observed distress tolerance, an important component of mindfulness (Behavioral Indicator of Resiliency to Distress; Lejeuz et al., 2006)
Up to 3 months of follow-up
Self-compassion, self-reported
Time Frame: Up to 3 months of follow-up
Self-Compassion Scale, short form (Raes, Pommier, Neff, & Van Gucht, 2011). This scale has 12 items, answered on a scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). There are 6 subscales measured on this scale, each with 2 items: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. Subscale and total scores are calculated based on means after reverse scoring so that high scores indicate higher self-compassion (minimum: 1; maximum: 5).
Up to 3 months of follow-up
Adolescent reports of emotion regulation
Time Frame: Up to 3 months of follow-up
Emotion regulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; Gratz & Roemer, 2004). This scale has 36 items that measure difficulties in 6 sub-dimensions of emotion regulation: nonacceptance of emotional responses (6 items: minimum: 1; maximum: 36), difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior (5 items: minimum: 1; maximum: 30), impulse control difficulties (6 items: minimum: 1; maximum: 36), lack of emotional awareness (6 items: minimum: 1; maximum: 36), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items: minimum: 1, maximum 48), and lack of emotional clarity (5 items: minimum: 1; maximum: 30). Questions are answered on a scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Subscale and total scores are summed such that higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotion regulation (total scores: minimum: 1, maximum: 180).
Up to 3 months of follow-up
Anxiety
Time Frame: Up to 3 months of follow-up
Parent and adolescent reported youth anxiety (Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale; Chorpita, Yim, Moffitt, Umemoto, & Francis, 2000). This scale has 47 items answered on a scale from 0 (never) to 3 (always), and answers are summed. Total scores range from 0 to 141, with higher scores reflecting more symptoms of anxiety and depression. Subscales can also be used to calculate scores for separation anxiety (7 items; minimum: 0, maximum: 21), social anxiety (9 items; minimum: 0, maximum 27), obsessive/compulsions (6 items; minimum: 0, maximum: 18), panic/agoraphobia (9 items; minimum: 0, maximum: 27), generalized anxiety (6 items; minimum: 0, maximum: 18), and major depression (10 items; minimum: 0, maximum: 30), with higher scores reflecting more symptoms.
Up to 3 months of follow-up
Cortisol stress reactivity
Time Frame: Up to 3 months of follow-up
Cortisol reactivity to a stressor (saliva samples after baseline and immediately as well as 10 and 20m after stressor); area under the curve will be calculated
Up to 3 months of follow-up
Cardiovascular stress reactivity
Time Frame: Up to 3 months of follow-up
Adolescent cardiovascular reactivity to a stressor (across three minutes intervals at baseline and during the stressor); change from baseline to stressor will be calculated
Up to 3 months of follow-up
Diurnal cortisol production
Time Frame: Up to 3 months of follow-up
Cortisol production across the day (participants will be asked to provide samples upon awakening, 30 minutes after waking, at 4:00 PM, and before brushing their teeth for bed) to calculate cortisol awakening responses and decreases in cortisol production from morning to evening
Up to 3 months of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M2M
  • K01AT009592 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Researchers interested in using these data to test novel hypotheses can contact the corresponding author and submit a data proposal form to be reviewed by the study team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Learning to BREATHE Plus

Subscribe