One Year Clinical Evaluation of Conservative Versus Conventional Ceramic Onlays

February 10, 2022 updated by: howaida ahmed el-hagrasy, Cairo University
the aim of present study is to evaluate clinically the fracture liability , marginal adaptation , and patient satisfaction of conservative versus conventional ceramic Onlays use e-max press to restore defective restored molar with old restoration or caries. with one or more cusp defect

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Eman Hussein

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:Inclusion criteria:

All subjects are required to be:

1-From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document. 2- Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations 3- Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures 4- Patients with teeth problems indicated for onlay restoration:

  1. Decayed teeth
  2. Teeth restored with defected filling restorations
  3. Teeth with occlusal defect 5- Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation Exclusion criteria

    1. Patient less than 18 or more than 50 years
    2. Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases
    3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients
    4. Pregnant women
    5. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
    6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
    7. Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest

      -

      -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: onlays conservative
conservative onlays preparation with partial cusp coverage only defective cusps
Partial coverage of cusps with shoulder finish line
Active Comparator: onlays conventional
onlays preparation design conventional as all cusps covered with shoulder finish line preparation
all coverage of cusps as overlay with shoulder finish line

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluation of fracture resistance
Time Frame: one year

fracture resistance of restorations postoperatively: assessment of the restoration for fracture resistance , by using Measuring device Modified United States Public Health Service (MUSPHS) parameters were used to compare the restorations at baseline and final examination use explorer Measuring unit .Discrete(scores)

  1. alpha no evidence of fracture
  2. bravo evidence of fracture
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluation of marginal adaptation
Time Frame: 1 year

marginal adaptation of restorations postoperatively assessment by Measuring device Modified USPHS Criteria Measuring unit .Discrete(scores) use explorer

  1. alpha no visible evidence of ditching along the margin
  2. bravo visible evidence of ditching along the margin not extending to the DE junction
  3. charlie mismatch between restoration and tooth structure within the normal range of color, shade ,translucency
1 year
evaluation of patient satisfaction to the onlay restoration through questioning the patient about pain during eating , acceptability ,sensitivity
Time Frame: 1 year
patient satisfaction of restoration use Questionnaire VAS* Measuring device Measuring unit Numerical(discrete) ('0' unsatisfied-'10' satisfied)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 15, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • resala

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Decay

Clinical Trials on onlays conservative

3
Subscribe