- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02522585
p16 and Ki-67 Stainings and Natural Killer (NK) Cells in CIN-II Management
Predictive Value of p16 and Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Staining and NK Cells in Expectant Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Cervical cancer and its precursor lesions, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), represents a significant public health problem,induced by persistent infection of human papillomavirus (HPV). It is known that a significant percentage of CIN regresses spontaneously and only a minority of these lesions progress to cervical cancer. CIN-II is an intermediate state that can regress to CIN-I or less, or progress to CIN-III spontaneously. The rate of spontaneous regression and progression in follow-up studies are around 40-60% and 10-20%, respectively. Overestimating CIN-II lesions may cause overtreatment by excisional treatment and increase the risk of subsequent obstetric complications.
Patients newly diagnosed with CIN-II colposcopy-directed biopsy who agreed to follow up at four months intervals for at least 12 months with cervical cytology and colposcopy, were prospectively recruited. p16, ki-67 and NK receptors expression were analyzed in all CIN-II biopsies. Total regression, partial regression, persistence and progression rates of CIN-II were defined as a final outcome.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- preferred expectant management than immediate treatment
- exocervical histological diagnosis of CIN-II
- lesion completely visualized by colposcopy
- entire squamocolumnar junction of the cervix was visible
- showing no evidence of any immunodeficiency disease
- no history of previous cervical treatment
- could be followed-up every four months during one year
- signed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- not coming to follow up appointments
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Conservative management
Patients diagnosed of CIN-II by directed biopsy
|
Control of CIN-II with cytology and colposcopy to try to avoid unnecessary surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Status of cervix pathology using cervical smear test (CIN grade)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Cervical cytology test and colposcopy every 4 months starting with diagnose CIN-II or CIN-III means presence of lesion, CIN-I is regression of the lesion, and Negative is abscence of lesion.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gemma Mancebo, PhD, Parc de Salut Mar
- Study Chair: Ramon Carreras, PhD, Parc de Salut Mar
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Discacciati MG, de Souza CA, d'Otavianno MG, Angelo-Andrade LA, Westin MC, Rabelo-Santos SH, Zeferino LC. Outcome of expectant management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women followed for 12 months. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Apr;155(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
- McAllum B, Sykes PH, Sadler L, Macnab H, Simcock BJ, Mekhail AK. Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):478.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.069. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
- Tsoumpou I, Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Wentzensen N, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Malamou-Mitsi V, Paraskevaidis E. p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 May;35(3):210-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
- del Pino M, Garcia S, Fuste V, Alonso I, Fuste P, Torne A, Ordi J. Value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of progression/regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):488.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.046. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
- Galgano MT, Castle PE, Atkins KA, Brix WK, Nassau SR, Stoler MH. Using biomarkers as objective standards in the diagnosis of cervical biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Aug;34(8):1077-87. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e8b2c4.
- Guedes AC, Brenna SM, Coelho SA, Martinez EZ, Syrjanen KJ, Zeferino LC. p16(INK4a) Expression does not predict the outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Sep-Oct;17(5):1099-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00899.x. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CIN-II p16 NK
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.