The Effect of Motor Imagery in Patients With Radius Distal End Fracture

The Effect of Motor Imagery on Pain, Kinesiophobia, Functionality and Quality of Life in Patients With Radius Distal End Fracture

Distal Radius End Fracture (DRC) is one of the most common fractures among all extremity fractures and wrist fractures . Pain, edema and functional loss are common findings in patients, and the physiotherapy program should be well planned from an early time. However, although there are different physiotherapy and rehabilitation applications in the treatment of DRC, there is not enough information about the effectiveness of the applications when the evidence-based studies are examined.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of motor imagery added to conventional treatment versus conventional treatment with telerehabilitation in patients with distal radius end fracture. Motor imagery is defined as the mental presentation of voluntary movement without body movement. It is an application that does not require cost and it is a training that can be easily applied in rehabilitation programs. Telerehabilitation is important in the management of patients in the acute phase of the disease, as well as in the remote management of individuals with chronic health problems. Cases who applied to Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic and were referred to Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department will be included in the study. Few studies have examined the effects of motor imagery on pain, kinesiophobia, and functionality in musculoskeletal injuries. Studies on the effects of motor imagery on different patient groups are needed. Therefore, in our study, the effect of motor imagery training applied with the telerehabilitation method on pain, kinesiophobia and functionality in patients with distal radius end fracture will be examined.

Sociodemographic data form of all subjects who volunteered to participate in the study; Age, gender, height, weight, pain, dominant extremity, and the type of fracture will be questioned. In addition, pain intensity is measured with a visual analog scale, normal joint movement measurement (wrist flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, and forearm supination and pronation) with goniometer, hand grip strength with "Hydraulic hand dynamometer" , finger grip strength "Hydraulic Finger Dynamometer", kinesiophobia Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale, functionality "Arm, Shoulder and Hand Injury Questionnaire in Turkish (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand-Turkish - DASH-T and The Patient-Based Wrist Assessment Questionnaire (HBEBD), with the fine dexterity Moberg Pick Up test, the motor imagery ability with the Recognize™ phone app and the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, quality of life will be evaluated with SF-12.

After the initial evaluation, the treatment program was started. Advances in the treatment method specific to the groups they belong to are explained in detail below.

Treatment:

After the distal radius end fracture, after 6 weeks of plaster application, after the first evaluation to be made in the clinic after the plaster was removed, in the next session, after patient education, conventional treatment was applied to the cases in Group 1, 3 days a week as stated below.

Group 2: Conservative Treatment + Motor Imagery Program Patients in this group will have motor imagery in addition to conservative treatment. The patients in this group will first be given a motor imagery introductory session. According to the results of the observation and evaluation made by the physiotherapist before the treatment, the function of the patients

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Distal Radius Fracture
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Conservative treatment via telerehabilitation; Other: Conservative treatmen + motor imagery

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 30
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Turkey
  • İstanbul, Turkey
    • Melike Gizem Kalaycı

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Distal radius fracture and conservative treatment was decided

Exclusion Criteria:

• Bilateral fracture
• Cases with unstable, comminuted or complicated fractures, fractures associated with malignant conditions, presence of infection, cognitive impairment or inability to perceive verbal commands, and bilateral fractures will not be included in the study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conservative; Conservative Treatment Program	Other: Conservative treatment via telerehabilitation; Patients will do their exercises in the form of a WhatsApp video call or a Zoom video call. Contrast bath, massage application for 5 minutes, passive, active assistive normal range of motion. Ice application. After 4 weeks strenghtening exercise. The treatment time 8 weeks.
Experimental: Motor Imagery; Conservative Treatment + Motor Imagery Program	Other: Conservative treatment via telerehabilitation; Patients will do their exercises in the form of a WhatsApp video call or a Zoom video call. Contrast bath, massage application for 5 minutes, passive, active assistive normal range of motion. Ice application. After 4 weeks strenghtening exercise. The treatment time 8 weeks.; Other: Conservative treatmen + motor imagery; Patients will do their exercises in the form of a WhatsApp video call or a Zoom video call. Contrast bath, 5-minute massage, passive, active auxiliary normal range of motion. Ice application. Strengthening exercise after 4 weeks. The duration of treatment is 8 weeks. This group applies motor images for a maximum of 5 minutes. They will implement functionality-based motor images.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Muscle Strenght	A dynamometer was used to evaluate muscle strength. Muscle strength was evaluated in the following muscles, each measurement was made three times and the maximum was taken.	3 minutes
Functionality Level	Dash, The Patient-Based Wrist Assessment Questionnaire (HBEBD)	10 minutes
Kinesiofobia Level	Kinesiophobia, defined as an excessive, irrational, and debilitating fear of physical movement and activity resulting from a feeling of vulnerability due to painful injury or reinjury" is found to be a central factor in the process of pain developing from acute to chronic stages .Tampa scale	10 minutes
Pain Level	Purpose and application of the test: The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is used to convert some values that cannot be measured numerically into numericals. Two end definitions of the parameter to be evaluated are written on both ends of a 100 mm line and the patient is asked to indicate where his condition is appropriate by drawing a line or by placing a point or pointing on this line. Rest, activity and night were evaluated in three different time periods	1 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Normal Range of Motion	Upper extremity joints and range of motion were evaluated	5 minutes
the Recognize™	Use the Recognise App to quickly exercise your synapses on your device, wherever you are.	10 minutes
SF-12	The SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. It is often used as a quality of life measure.	From the start of treatment until 8 week after the end of treatment
the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire	The KVIQ assesses on a five-point ordinal scale the clarity of the image (visual: V subscale) and the intensity of the sensations (kinesthetic: K subscale) that the subjects are able to imagine from the first-person perspective.	10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
• Investigators: Study Director: Melike Gizem Kalaycı, PhD, Bahçeşehir University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 1, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): January 31, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): May 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 26, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 29, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): May 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 11, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 9, 2024
• Last Verified: June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Fracture; telerehabilitation; Motor imagery; radius
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Wounds and Injuries; Arm Injuries; Forearm Injuries; Wrist Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Radius Fractures; Wrist Fractures
• Other Study ID Numbers: IstanbulUniversityCerrahpasa

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No