Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Durability of EN3835 in the Treatment and Retreatment of Plantar Fibromatosis

March 19, 2025 updated by: Endo Pharmaceuticals

A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Durability of EN3835 in the Treatment and Retreatment of Plantar Fibromatosis

Assess the long-term safety and efficacy of EN3835 in participants who have participated in a parent placebo-controlled study of EN3835 (EN3835-222, NCT05152173) and assess the efficacy and safety of EN3835 in the treatment and retreatment of plantar fibromatosis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

145

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Bakersfield, California, United States, 19331
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #12
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93710
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #3
      • La Mesa, California, United States, 91942
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #23
      • Tarzana, California, United States, 91356
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #13
      • Vista, California, United States, 92083
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #15
      • Whittier, California, United States, 90603
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #18
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #24
      • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States, 33782
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #8
      • Sweetwater, Florida, United States, 33172
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #21
    • Georgia
      • Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States, 30043
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #22
    • Idaho
      • Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #25
    • Illinois
      • Decatur, Illinois, United States, 62521
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #19
      • O'Fallon, Illinois, United States, 62269
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #2
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62704
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #14
    • Maryland
      • Pasadena, Maryland, United States, 21122
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #6
    • Missouri
      • Jefferson City, Missouri, United States, 65109
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #16
    • Pennsylvania
      • York, Pennsylvania, United States, 17402
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #9
    • Texas
      • Bedford, Texas, United States, 76021
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #4
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75208
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #17
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75251
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #26
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #5
      • Georgetown, Texas, United States, 78628
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #27
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77027
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #7
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77095
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #10
      • McAllen, Texas, United States, 78501
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #1
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #11
    • Virginia
      • Suffolk, Virginia, United States, 23434
        • Endo Clinical Trial Site #20

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have been enrolled and completed a sponsored-clinical study of EN3835 (for the EN3835-222 study, participants who completed the study are those that completed the Day 57 visit, were assessed for safety and received at least 1 dose of study intervention).
  2. Willing and able to comply with all protocol required visits and assessments.
  3. Agree not to use opioids during the study period and has not used opioids 2 weeks prior to the Observational Day 1 Visit.
  4. Agree to not initiate or change use of orthotics or inserts designed to relieve symptoms of plantar fibromatosis during the study period.
  5. Willing and able to comply with all protocol required visits and assessments.
  6. Be adequately informed and understand the nature and risks of the study and be able to provide consent
  7. If female, be of non-childbearing potential (history of hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or postmenopausal with no history of menstrual flow in the 12 months prior to the Day 1 Visit), or, if of childbearing potential, be nonpregnant, non-lactating and agree to use effective contraception when with a male partner for the duration of the study and for 28 days after any active treatment period.
  8. Have no significant medical history or examination findings related to the participant's plantar nodules, which in the investigator's opinion, would make the participant unsuitable for EN3835 administration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Has any musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, neurosensory, or other neurological or related disorder that affects the participant's use of his or her feet and/or would impair his/her completion of study assessments as determined by the investigator.
  2. Any other significant medical condition or had an SAE in the parent study which in the investigator's opinion, would make the participant unsuitable for enrollment in the study.
  3. Received or plans to receive surgical or non-surgical treatments on the foot or nodules that were treated.
  4. Has a known systemic allergy to collagenase or any other excipient of EN3835.
  5. Has a known bleeding disorder that would make the participant unsuitable for treatment or retreatment in the study.
  6. Has significant medical history or examination findings related to the participant's plantar nodules, which in the investigator's opinion, would make the participant unsuitable for EN3835 administration.
  7. Has a known coagulation disorder or is taking any medications that would increase the risk of bleeding (except <150mg of aspirin daily, 7 days prior to first injection and for the duration of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Observation Only Group
Experimental: Treated or Retreated Group
Treatment or retreatment with EN3835

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants reporting adverse events (AE)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 450
Proportion of participants reporting AE during the study assessed by incidence, severity and duration
Day 1 to Day 450

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline on the Foot Function Index (FFI) total score in participants treated in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline on the FFI total score on a 5-point rating scale (0-4). This score is comprised of activity limitation, difficulty, and pain subscales. Each subscale is scored on a 5-point rating scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being never, no difficulty, or none and 4 being always, a lot of difficulty, and extreme.
Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline on the Foot Function Index (FFI) subscales in participants treated in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline on the FFI subscales (pain, difficulty, and activity limitation). This score is comprised of activity limitation, difficulty, and pain subscales. Each subscale is scored on a 5-point rating scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being never, no difficulty, or none and 4 being always, a lot of difficulty, and extreme.
Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline in the nodular hardness in participants treated in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline in the nodular hardness of the treated nodules measured by durometer
Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline in the nodular consistency of the treated nodules by palpation in participants treated in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline in the nodular consistency of the treated nodules by palpation
Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline on the Pain Intensity NRS ranging from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Imaginable)
Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Proportion of participants that meet Treatment Session 1 criteria in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Days 180 or 270
Proportion of participants that meet Treatment Session 1 criteria
Days 180 or 270
Proportion of participants on the Subject Satisfaction with Treatment Scale in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Proportion of participants reporting "Quiet Satisfied" (+1) and "Very Satisfied" (+2) on the Subject Satisfaction with Treatment Scale
Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Proportion of participants on the Clinician Global Impression of Change Scale in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Proportion of participants reporting "Minimally Improved" (+1), "Much Improved" (+2) or "Very Much Improved" (+3) on the Clinician Global Impression of Change Scale
Observational Days 60, 120, 180, 270, 360, and 450
Change from baseline (Retreatment) on the Foot Function Index (FFI) total score in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29,43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) with EN3835 on the FFI total score on a 5-point rating scale (0-4). This score is comprised of activity limitation, difficulty, and pain subscales. Each subscale is scored on a 5-point rating scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being never, no difficulty, or none and 4 being always, a lot of difficulty, and extreme.
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29,43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment) on the Foot Function Index (FFI) subscales (pain, difficulty, and activity limitation) in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29,43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) with EN3835 on the FFI subscales (pain, difficulty, and activity limitation). This score is comprised of activity limitation, difficulty, and pain subscales. Each subscale is scored on a 5-point rating scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being never, no difficulty, or none and 4 being always, a lot of difficulty, and extreme.
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29,43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment) in the nodular hardness of the treated nodules in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) with EN3835 in the nodular hardness of the treated nodules measured by durometer
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) in the nodular consistency of the treated nodules by palpation in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) with EN3835 in the nodular consistency of the treated nodules by palpation
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) with EN3835 on the Pain Intensity NRS ranging from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Imaginable)
Change from baseline (Retreatment Day 1) to Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Proportion of participants reporting on the Subject Satisfaction with Treatment Scale in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Proportion of participants reporting to be "Quiet Satisfied" (+1) and "Very Satisfied" (+2) on the Subject Satisfaction with Treatment Scale on Retreatment Days
Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Proportion of participants reporting on the Clinician Global Impression of Change Scale in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Proportion of participants reporting "Minimally Improved" (+1), "Much Improved (+2)" or "Very Much Improved (+3) on the Clinician Global Impression of Change Scale on Retreatment Days
Retreatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) on the Foot Function Index (FFI) total score in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Treatment 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) with EN3835 on the FFI total score on a 5-point rating scale (0-4). This score is comprised of activity limitation, difficulty, and pain subscales. Each subscale is scored on a 5-point rating scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being never, no difficulty, or none and 4 being always, a lot of difficulty, and extreme.
Change from baseline (Treatment 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) on the Foot Function Index (FFI) subscales in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (Treatment 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) with EN3835 on the FFI subscales (pain, difficulty, and activity limitation). This score is comprised of activity limitation, difficulty, and pain subscales. Each subscale is scored on a 5-point rating scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being never, no difficulty, or none and 4 being always, a lot of difficulty, and extreme.
Change from Baseline (Treatment 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) in the nodular hardness of the treated nodules in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) with EN3835 in the nodular hardness of the treated nodules measured by durometer
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) in the nodular consistency of the treated nodules in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) with EN3835 in the nodular consistency of the treated nodules be palpation
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) with EN3835 on the Pain Intensity NRS ranging from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Imaginable)
Change from baseline (Treatment Day 1) to Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Proportion of participants reporting on the Subject Satisfaction with Treatment Scale in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Proportion of participants reporting to be "Quite Satisfied" (+1) and "Very Satisfied" (+2) on the Subject Satisfaction with Treatment Scale
Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Proportion of participants reporting on the Clinician Global Impression of Change Scale in the parent studies, and participants retreated in this study
Time Frame: Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Proportion of participants reporting "Minimally Improved" (+1 ), "Much Improved" (+2) or "Very Much Improved" (+3) on the Clinician Global Impression of Change Scale
Treatment Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 117, 197, and 237
Presence of anti-AUX-I and anti-AUX-II antibody titer levels
Time Frame: Retreatment/Treatment Day 57 and Day 450
Presence of anti-AUX-I and anti-AUX-II antibody titer levels in EN3835 treated and retreated participants
Retreatment/Treatment Day 57 and Day 450
Presence of neutralizing antibodies to AUX-I and AUX-II
Time Frame: Retreatment/ Treatment Day 57 and Day 450
Presence of neutralizing antibodies to AUX-I and AUX-II in EN3835 treated and retreated participants
Retreatment/ Treatment Day 57 and Day 450

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nina Green, Endo Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Fibromatosis

Clinical Trials on EN3835

Subscribe