Development, Intraoperative Demonstration and Visualization of Surgical Assistance Functions (IDEMONSTRATE)

February 6, 2026 updated by: Technische Universität Dresden
The aim of the planned study is the development of surgical assistance functions on the basis of clinical routine data and the evaluation of the technical feasibility of an intraoperative demonstration and visualization of such assistance functions in visceral surgery. Furthermore, this trial aims to provide preliminary data on the clinical outcome of such assistance systems.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of the clinical trial is to create the conditions for the comprehensive scientific use of new technologies such as augmented and virtual reality, computer-aided navigation and robotics in surgery in order to use these technologies in the future for improved surgical therapy for the benefit of the patient and to support the treating surgical team. The IDEMONSTRATE study is divided into two study parts: the development of a surgical assistance function based on routinely collected clinical (image) data that displays the position of anatomical structures (e.g. blood vessels, organs, tumors) in real time and the technical evaluation of this assistance system in the clinical environment.

For the development of the surgical assistance function, data routinely collected as part of surgical inpatient treatment will be used. For research purposes (and explicitly not to prepare for approval as a medical device), a surgical assistance function is to be developed from this that displays the position of anatomical structures in real time during visceral surgical interventions. This system will then be evaluated in the second part of the study with regard to its technical feasibility and medical relevance.

For the evaluation of the developed assistance function in the context of clinical treatment, the patients and the staff involved will be informed separately. All patients who are eligible for inclusion in the evaluating part of the study are fully capable of giving their consent. All doctors who will take part in the evaluation of the developed algorithm in a clinical context are specialists in general or visceral surgery; these doctors are informed in detail about the risks and sources of error in the context of the application before the developed algorithm and the associated assistance function is used. The evaluation of the developed assistance function takes place exclusively in the context of planned interventions, not in emergency situations.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Saxony
      • Dresden, Saxony, Germany, 01307
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Gastrointestinal-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fiona Kolbinger, Dr. med.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Stefanie Speidel, Prof. Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will enroll patients undergoing surgery using a laparoscopic or open surgical camera, a surgical robot (e.g. DaVinci®), or intraoperative imaging technology (e.g. ultrasound, CT).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for surgery using a laparoscopic or open surgical camera, a surgical robot (e.g., DaVinci system), or an intraoperative imaging modality (e.g. sonography, intraoperative CT)
  • Patient understands German

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of ability to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of intraoperative technical errors of the applied assistance system
Time Frame: during surgery
Major technical errors: system crash, calculation latency > 1 second, Image distortions
during surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of postoperative hospital stay [days]
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Postoperative day 1 until day of discharge
At day of discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Duration of postoperative intermediate/intensive care unit stay [days]
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Postoperative day 1 until day of discharge
At day of discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Assessment of usability of guidance system
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Surgeon questionnaire, the questionnaire qualitatively assesses nine items, each item scoring from "not at all" to "very much", evaluated individually
48 hours after surgery
Evaluation of surgical skills
Time Frame: during surgery
The IDEMONSTRATE skill assessment scale v1.0 will be used to rate surgical skill on a scale from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher skill levels.
during surgery
Display accuracy of guidance functions
Time Frame: during surgery
The IDEMONSTRATE display accuracy scale v1.0 will be used to rate display accuracy on a scale from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better display accuracy.
during surgery
Operating time [min]
Time Frame: during surgery
Time from skin incision until placement of last skin staple/suture
during surgery
Frequency of peri-operative morbidity after resection
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Frequency of peri-operative complications after surgery
At day of discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Kind of peri-operative morbidity after resection
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Kind of peri-operative complications after surgery
At day of discharge, assessed up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marius Distler, Prof. Dr., Technical University Dresden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2050

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2050

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VTG-09

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Following publication of study results, de-identified patient data may be made available upon reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Surgery

Clinical Trials on Surgery with intraoperative imaging

Subscribe