Efficacy and Safety of Low Energy Shock Wave Plus BotulinumToxin A in Treating Patients With Interstitial Cystitis

March 11, 2022 updated by: Hann-Chorng Kuo, M.D., Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Low Energy Shock Wave (LESW) Plus Botulinum Toxin A Instillation in Treatment of Patients With Interstitial Cystitis Refractory to Conventional Therapy - A Clinical and Immunohistochemistry Study

Low energy shock wave (LESW) is known to facilitate tissue regeneration with analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. LESW treatment has been demonstrated effective in treatment of nonbacterial prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome. LESW reduced pain behavior and down-regulated the NGF expression, suppressed bladder overactivity by decreasing inflammation, IL-6 and COX2 expression and NGF expression. Previous rat interstitial cystitis (IC) models have shown LESW could increase urothelial permeability, facilitate intravesical botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) delivery and block acetic acid induced hyperactive bladder, suggesting LESW might be a potential therapeutic candidate for relieving bladder inflammatory conditions and overactivity. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled physician-initiated study revealed LESW treatment was associated with a statistically significant decrease in O'Leary-Saint Symptom Score and visual analog scale of pain in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), but the improvement was not superior to the sham LESW treatment. Previous studies found the urothelial dysfunction and deficits of cell differentiation are fundamental pathophysiology of IC/BPS. Through intravesical platelet-rich plasma injections, the chronic inflammation in IC/BPS bladders could be reduced and improved cell differentiation of urothelium. Botox injection or liposome encapsulated Botox could also inhibit inflammation and improve IC/BPS symptoms. However, the Botox injection needs anesthesia and certain complications might occur. There is no study to test if LESW plus Botox intravesical instillation could improve bladder inflammation and relieve IC/BPS symptoms. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of concomitant LESW plus intravesical BoNT-A instillation for IC/BPS refractory to conventional treatments.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Interstitial cystitis/ bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a bladder disorder with unknown etiology and difficult treatment. Novel treatments have been searched to adequately improved symptoms. Low energy shock wave (LESW) increased urothelial permeability, facilitated intravesical botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) delivery and blocked acetic acid induced hyperactive bladder. Rats that received BoNT-A plus LESW showed a significantly reduced response (48.6% decreased intercontractile interval) to acetic acid instillation without compromising voiding function. Rats pre-treated with BoNT-A plus LESW showed a decreased inflammatory reaction (p <0.05), and decreased expressions of SNAP-23 (p < 0.05), SNAP-25 (p = 0.061) and COX-2 (p < 0.05) compared with the control group. These results support LESW as a promising method to deliver BoNT-A across urothelium without the need for injection. LESW is known to facilitate tissue regeneration with analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. LESW treatment reduced pain behavior and down-regulated the NGF expression (33.3%, P < 0.05) on day 4 and IL-6 (40.9%, P < 0.05). LESW treatment suppressed bladder overactivity (intercontractile interval 77.8% increase, P < 0.05) by decreasing inflammation and COX2 (38.6%, P < 0.05) expression and NGF expression (25.2%, P = 0.0812). Previous study revealed that LESW might be a potential candidate for relieving bladder inflammatory conditions and overactivity. Recent clinical trial also revealed that Intravesical instillation of BoNT-A and LESW is a safe and effective method for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder with a durable response for 2 months. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled physician-initiated study enrolled 54 patients with IC/BPS. The patients were assigned to LESW or placebo. At 4 weeks post-treatment, both groups were associated with a statistically significant decrease in OSS and VAS pain scale. A significantly higher proportion of patients on LESW responded as improved in the VAS ≥ 3 vs placebo (P = 0.035). At 12 weeks post-treatment, improvement in the VAS ≥ 3 was 57.1% vs 19.0% (LESW vs placebo; P = 0.011). No significant adverse events were found in either group. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of concomitant LESW plus intravesical BoNT-A instillation for IC/BPS patients refractory to conventional treatments.

Materials and Methods

Eligible participants of either gender with IC/BPS refractory to at least two treatments will be enrolled to this study. Participants are randomly allocated to receive either treatment in 1:1 ratio according to the permuted block randomization code as the following:

(A) LESW treatment with 3000 shocks, and followed by intravesical instillation of 30ml normal saline. (placebo group)

(B) LESW with 3000 shocks, and followed by intravesical BoNT-A 100U instillation. (treatment group)

Urine samples will be collected for urinary protein and biomarkers analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hualien City, Taiwan, 970
        • Recruiting
        • Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults with age of 20 years old or above
  2. Patients with symptoms of frequency, urgency, and bladder pain at full bladder for more than 6 months.
  3. Proven to have glomerulations (at least grade 1) by cystoscopic hydrodistention under anesthesia in recent 1 year
  4. Free of active urinary tract infection
  5. Free of bladder outlet obstruction on enrolment
  6. Free of overt neurogenic bladder dysfunction and limitation of ambulation.
  7. Patient or his/her legally acceptable representative agrees to sign the written informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient's lower urinary tract symptoms can be effectively treated by conventional therapy
  2. Patient or his/her legally acceptable representative cannot sign the written informed consent form
  3. Patient cannot complete the consecutive 3- day voiding diary on the visiting day
  4. Patient had been treated for overactive bladder by enterocystoplasty
  5. Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease and such as congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, poorly controlled hypertension, not able to receive regular follow-up
  6. Patient has bladder outlet obstruction on enrollment
  7. Patients has post-void residual >250ml
  8. Patients with uncontrolled confirmed diagnosis of acute urinary tract infection
  9. Patients have laboratory abnormalities at screening including: ALT> 3 x upper limit of normal range, AST> 3 x upper limit of normal range; Patients have abnormal serum creatinine level > 2 x upper limit of normal range
  10. Patient has coagulation disorder
  11. Female patients who is pregnant, lactating, or with child-bearing potential without contraception.
  12. Patients with any other serious disease considered by the investigator not in the condition to enter the trial
  13. Patient had received intravesical hyaluronic acid insillation treatment for IC within recent 6 months before enrolment
  14. Patient had received intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for IC within recent 12 months before enrolment
  15. Patients participated investigational drug trial within 1 month before entering this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment group : BoNT-A 100 U in Normal saline
BOTOX 100U in normal saline (BoNT-A/NS) 30ml in single intravesical instillation
LESW with 3000 shocks, frequency of 3 pulses per second, and maximum total energy flow density 0.25 mJ/mm2 , and followed by intravesical BoNT-A 100U instillation in 30ml normal saline retained in the bladder for 2 hours, every one week for 4 times.
Other Names:
  • BOTOX
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo group : Normal saline
Normal saline (N/S) 30ml in single intravesical instillation
LESW treatment with 3000 shocks, frequency of 3 pulses per second, and maximum total energy flow density 0.25 mJ/mm2 , and followed by intravesical instillation of 30ml normal saline retained in the bladder for 2 hours after LESW application, every one week for 4 times.
Other Names:
  • Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
O'Leary-Sant Symptom Score
Time Frame: from baseline to 3 month after the treatment day
Change of the O'Leary-Sant symptom score (including Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index from 0 to 10 points and Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index, from 0 to 20 points; a higher score indicates a worse symptom severity)
from baseline to 3 month after the treatment day
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: from baseline to 3 month after the treatment day
Local or systemic adverse events such as hematuria, miction pain, difficult urination, or any systemic symptoms such as fever, general weakness, dyspnea, etc.)
from baseline to 3 month after the treatment day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global response assessment (GRA)
Time Frame: 1 month after the treatment day

Global response assessment (GRA) of satisfaction by the patient (categorized into -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 units of scale, indicating markedly worse to markedly improved) at 1 month after the treatment day.

An improvement of GRA by 2 units of scale at 1 month is considered effective.

1 month after the treatment day
Visual analog score (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Net change of the Visual analog score (VAS) for pain (from 0 to 10 units of scale, indicating no pain (0) to severe pain (10))
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Functional bladder capacity
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Net change of functional bladder capacity (FBC, in milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Voiding frequency per day
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Net change of voiding frequency at daytime and voiding frequency at night time as record in 3-day voiding diary
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
maximum flow rate
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month after the first treatment day
Net changes of the maximum flow rate (Qmax, in milliliter/second)
from baseline to 1 month after the first treatment day
voided volume
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month after the first treatment day
Net changes of the voided volume (in milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month after the first treatment day
Pos-tvoid residual volume (PVR)
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month after the first treatment day
Net changes of the PVR (in milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month after the first treatment day
urinary nerve growth factor (NGF)
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Changes of urinary NGF level in urine (in nanogram/milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
urinary brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Changes of urinary BDNF (in nanogram/milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Inflammatory cytokine IL-2 level
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Changes of cytokine IL-2 level (in nanogram/milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Inflammatory cytokines IL-6 level
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Changes of cytokines IL-6 level (in nanogram/milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Inflammatory cytokine IL-8 level
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Changes of cytokine IL-8 level (in nanogram/milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Inflammatory cytokine IL-1 beta level
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Changes of cytokine IL-1 beta level (in nanogram/milliliter)
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Safety outcome (Local and systemic adverse events)
Time Frame: from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day
Any adverse events occurring after treatment, including hematuria, micturition pain, difficulty in urination, urinary tract infection, or systemic symptoms
from baseline to 1 month and 3 months after the first treatment day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hann-Chorng Kuo, M.D., Department of Urology, Buddhist TzuChi General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 18, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe