Surveillance Pelvic Examination Anxiety: Brief Coping Skills Intervention (PEACE)

May 10, 2023 updated by: Duke University

Developing and Pilot Testing a Brief Intervention to Reduce Anxiety During Pelvic Examinations Among Female Cancer Survivors (Pelvic Examination and Anxiety Coping Skills for Empowerment: PEACE)

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a brief coping skills training program addressing anxiety and pain related to surveillance pelvic examinations for female gynecologic cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators have developed and manualized a coping skills training intervention for female gynecologic cancer patients that aims to reduce anxiety related to surveillance pelvic examinations (Pelvic Examination and Anxiety Coping Skills for Empowerment: PEACE). The investigators propose a proof-of concept pilot study to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the coping skills intervention. The study will be conducted by Duke University. Participants (N=16) will receive the 3-session telemedicine coping skills intervention. Participants will complete assessments at baseline, post-intervention (within 2 weeks before their next scheduled pelvic examination), and post pelvic examination (2-3 months after the baseline assessment). Study aims are: Aim 1) Assess intervention acceptability and feasibility through quantitative measurement and qualitative feedback from semi-structured interviews, and Aim 2) Graphically depict patterns of change in outcome variables and intervention targets.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female sex
  • diagnosis of stage I-IV cervical or endometrial cancer
  • 18 years of age or older
  • able to speak/read English
  • able to give informed consent
  • completed cancer treatments within 2-24 months prior to enrollment, and recommended to undergo surveillance pelvic examination at three month intervals
  • able to commit to three 45-60 minute visits within the study period
  • able to participate in the intervention via the telemedicine modality (e.g., phone or video)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to provide informed consent
  • major untreated or uncontrolled mental illness
  • hearing impairment that impedes telephone or video calls

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PEACE Program
3 sessions of tailored coping skills related to pelvic examinations
This pilot will consist of 3 individual telemedicine sessions to teach cognitive behavioral coping skills and provide education related to gynecologic cancer surveillance and psychological distress.
Other Names:
  • Pelvic Exam and Anxiety Coping Skills for Empowerment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention acceptability will be assessed using an adapted version of the Satisfaction with Therapy and Therapist Scale (STTS-R)
Time Frame: post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
The adapted STTS-R consists of 18 items that assess satisfaction with the therapist and the intervention on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Change in intervention acceptability will be assessed using an adapted version of the Satisfaction with Therapy and Therapist Scale (STTS-R)
Time Frame: post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination), post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Change in intervention acceptability from immediately after completion of the 3 sessions (post intervention assessment) to after trying to implement the coping skills during their next pelvic examination (post pelvic exam assessment), using the STTS-R. The adapted STTS-R consists of 18 items that assess satisfaction with the therapist and the intervention on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination), post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Intervention feasibility as measured by percentage of recruited participants who enrolled
Time Frame: post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Enrollment logs will capture the number of participants who were recruited and among them, the number that enrolled in the study.
post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Intervention feasibility as measured by attrition
Time Frame: post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Retention logs will capture the number of participants who did not complete the study protocol (rate of attrition)
post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Intervention feasibility as measured by survey completion
Time Frame: post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Retention logs will capture the number of participants who completed all assessments
post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Intervention feasibility as measured by home practice completion
Time Frame: post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination)
Interventionist logs completed at the conclusion of each session will capture the level of home practice completion
post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination)
Intervention feasibility as measured by participant engagement
Time Frame: post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination)
Interventionist logs completed at the conclusion of each session will capture the level of participant engagement with a 1 item question rated from 1 (not at all engaged) to 4 (highly engaged).
post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination)
Intervention feasibility as measured by interventionist fidelity
Time Frame: post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination)
Fidelity rating forms will be used to measure the level of fidelity to session content for one third of the sessions for the protocol. Each component of the session will be rated from 0 (not covered at all) to 3 (thoroughly covered the topic)
post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in anxiety related to examination as measured by the The State Anxiety Scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination), post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
The State Anxiety Scale of the STAI is comprised of 20 items on a 5-point Likert scale, which range from 1 (not at all) through 4 (very much).
baseline, post-intervention (within 2 weeks of their next pelvic examination), post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Change in pain during examination as measured by numeric scales
Time Frame: baseline, post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)
Numeric scales will be used to assess the average pain during examination, worst pain during examination, and lowest pain during examination, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you could imagine). The three pain intensity ratings will be averaged to create a total score for pain.
baseline, post pelvic examination (approximately 2-3 months after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Shelby, PhD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO00107843

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on PEACE Program

Subscribe