Safety and Efficiency of the PacePress to Prevent Hemorrhagic Complications in Patients Undergoing CIED Implantation. (PacePress)

September 16, 2025 updated by: Medinice S.A.

Assessment of Safety and Efficiency of the Medical Device Called PacePress to Prevent Hemorrhagic Complications in Patients With High Bleeding Risk Undergoing CIED Implantation Procedures in an Open-label, Multi-Centre Clinical Trial.

PacePress medical device, by ensuring constant compression force and the ability to optimize it in the pocket area prevents/significantly reduces the risk of hemorrhagic complications, including but not limited to the operation pocket hematoma. By avoiding a strong localized compression and ensuring "covering compression" achieved by the appropriate distribution of compression forces on the entire implantation site area, with an automated compression force control, the risk of a pressure sore created in the compressed pocket area is reduced.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will be an open-label, multi-center, monitored randomized study with 235 subjects qualified for:

  • the CIED implantation procedure (initial),
  • the CIED replacement procedure (ICD, CRT),
  • expantion of the system,
  • revision of electrodes.

The study consists in randomization of patients who meet all the inclusion criteria and do not meet any of the exclusion criteria, after performing the above procedure for the group (A): the PacePress medical device will be used, or (B): a standard of care will be used, in order to compare the safety and efficacy of the PacePress in relation to the standard of care, in preventing hemorrhagic complications and site infections.

Data regarding the assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the PacePress medical device are collected on the day of the procedure and during the 30-day patient observation.

In PacePress clinical trial, the standard pharmacotherapeutic procedures in the facility are not modified or affected (including but not limited to the anti-coagulation and antiplatelet treatment) according to the guidelines and standard procedure ESC and PTK in patients included in the study.

The investigational medical device is the PacePress (Medinice S.A.). This is an electronically-controlled self-pressure dressing that, , thanks to a well-selected compression force, may contribute significantly to preventing hemorrhagic complications following electrotherapy procedures, including increasing the safety of CIED implantation procedures and accelerating wound healing significantly.

The planned number of patients included in the study is 235 patients aged above 18 years. The study subjects will be divided into groups at random (4:1):

GROUP A - Following the procedure, the patients will be dressed in the PacePress - investigational medical device instead of a standard compression device.

The planned number of group members: n= 188 people.

GROUP B - Following the procedure, the patients will be dressed in the standard compression device.

The planned number of group members: n= 47 people.

In the study, the assumptions were made concerning the gradation and frequency of hematoma occurrence in particular groups and randomization of patients (4:1). Assuming the first-type error α=0.025 for the one-sided hypothesis and the test power of 0.8, 194 patients should be included in the study. Due to the planned interim analysis, which will be performed after half of the patients have been included in the study, and assuming the drop-out rate of 8 %, the required sample size should be increased to 235 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Poznan, Poland, 61-848
        • I Cardiology Clinic, Medical University in Poznań
      • Warsaw, Poland, 01-211
        • Wolski Hospital, Cardiology Ward
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-091
        • Cardiology Clinic, Medical University of Warsaw
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-507
        • Clinical Department of Cardiology, the National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • I Clinic for Cardiac Arrhythmias National Institute of Cardiology Stefan Cardinal Wyszyński National Research Institute
      • Zabrze, Poland, 41-800
        • Department of Cardiology / 1st Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases
    • Łódź Voivodeship
      • Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Poland, 92-213
        • Electrocardiology Clinic, Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years.
  2. The patient qualified for:

    • the CIED implantation procedure (initial),
    • the CIED replacement procedure (ICD, CRT),
    • expansion of the system,
    • revision of electrodes.
  3. The patient standing high bleeding risk defined as a result of PACE DRAP ≥5.
  4. The patient taking anti-coagulation or anti-platelet drugs or anti-coagulation and anti-platelet drugs permanently.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The absence of written consent to participate in the study.
  2. A female patient who is pregnant or breast-feeds.
  3. The interview reveals addiction to alcohol, drugs, and other psychoactive substances.
  4. The anamnesis reveals known hemorrhagic diathesis or thrombocytopenia, particularly after heparin is administered.
  5. Active infection of the implantation site.
  6. Active infection 4 weeks before inclusion in the study.
  7. Anomaly in the chest near the device site.
  8. The patient participates in another clinical trial.
  9. Anticipated life span < 6 months.
  10. Diagnosed allergy to any device ingredient.
  11. The patient undergoes active biological therapy.
  12. Treated cancer.
  13. The patient undergoes shoulder girdle physiotherapy.
  14. The patient undergoes systemic steroid therapy (intravenous therapy).
  15. Obesity preventing the application of PacePress device.

    Criteria excluding the patient from the study that may appear during or immediately after the procedure:

  16. Cardiac arrest (CPR)
  17. Perforation.
  18. Pneumothorax.
  19. Intubation (patient intubated after the procedure).
  20. Change of pacemaker position (conversion to the right side).
  21. Procedure completed without implantation of the intended system.
  22. Need for invasive treatment of complications of the procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PacePress
the patients will be dressed with PacePress medical device instead of a standard compression device
an electronically-controlled compression site which, thanks to a well-selected compression force, may contribute significantly to preventing hemorrhagic complications following electrotherapy procedures, including to increasing safety of CIED implantation procedures and accelerate wound healing significantly
Active Comparator: standard compression band/tourniquet
standard treatment with respect to preventing hemorrhagic complications and implantation site inflammation, the patients will be dressed with a standard compression device/sand bag
standard used compression band/sand bag

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of hematoma presence
Time Frame: 7 (-0/+2) days after the procedure
according to the classification: Degree 0 - No hematoma Degree 1 - Hematoma not visible clinically - petechia above the device site (a tiny exudate or extravasation near the device, not causing any skin raising visible in a macroscopic scale), Degree 2 - Hematoma visible clinically - a visible macroscopically and palpable swelling of CIED area clearly exceeding the device dimensions, causing the tenderness and painfulness of the affected area; petechia going beyond the pocket, fluctuation symptom, small skin tension, small skin raising, Degree 3 - Hematoma significant clinically - much exceeding the device dimensions, causing significant skin tension and raising, requiring evacuation or extending hospital stay by at least 24 hours; pocket pain, significant skin raising.
7 (-0/+2) days after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emergence of a hematoma
Time Frame: based on 24-48 hour and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
requiring a revision
based on 24-48 hour and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
Emergence of a hematoma
Time Frame: based on 24-48 hour, 7 (-0/+2) day and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
requiring longer hospital stay
based on 24-48 hour, 7 (-0/+2) day and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
Number of patients who need blood derivative transfusion
Time Frame: based on 24-48 hour, 7 (-0/+2) day and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
blood derivative transfusion need
based on 24-48 hour, 7 (-0/+2) day and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
Mortality rate
Time Frame: based on 24-48 hour, 7 (-0/+2) day and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
number of deaths
based on 24-48 hour, 7 (-0/+2) day and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
Infection
Time Frame: based on 24-48 hour, 7 (-0/+2) day and 30 (+/- 5) day observation
assessment of the wound left by the device implantation, considering any swelling of tissues around the device, fluctuation, redness, pain, excessive temperature, the outflow of any fluid from the pocket, CRP examination, WBC in the complete blood count
based on 24-48 hour, 7 (-0/+2) day and 30 (+/- 5) day observation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Przemysław Mitkowski, Prof. MD PhD, Medical University in Poznań

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 14, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 14, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pathologic Processes

Subscribe