Hypercapnia in Orthostatic Hypotension

November 27, 2023 updated by: Dr. Satish Raj, University of Calgary

Investigating Hypercapnia to Treat Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

The Autonomic (or "automatic") Nervous System (ANS) regulates internal processes, including control of heart rate and blood pressure (BP). When someone stands, and gravity tries to pull blood away from the brain, the ANS works to maintain BP and brain blood flow. Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension (NOH) occurs when our "fight-or-flight" part ("sympathetic") of the ANS fails. BP can drop a lot when upright, reducing blood flow and oxygen delivery to the brain, and this can cause symptoms of light-headedness, nausea, and fainting.

One solution to help counter the effects of NOH may be to increase sympathetic activity by breathing higher levels of carbon dioxide. In healthy volunteers, small increases in the amount of inhaled carbon dioxide has been shown to increase BP in the upright position, and this improves symptoms!

The objectives of the current study are to apply carbon dioxide in patients with NOH and healthy controls to: (a) evaluate the effects of breathing carbon dioxide on BP and brain blood flow, and (b) determine if a device that increases carbon dioxide while standing will work as a new therapy

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Regulation of tissue blood supply to vital organs such as the brain and heart is met in large part by local adjustment of the microvasculature (autoregulation) and autonomic nervous system control of the cardiovascular system. Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension (NOH) is a key example of when these systems fail. Patients experience a significant and persistent blood pressure (BP) drop (≥20/10 mmHg) in the upright position, resulting in cerebral hypoperfusion and symptoms of light-headedness, nausea, pre-syncope and even syncope. NOH and impaired cerebrovascular perfusion occur due to failure of the baroreflex to appropriately increase sympathetic outflow.

A novel solution to counter the acute effects of NOH is to transiently increase sympathetic activity by stimulating the peripheral and central respiratory chemoreceptors with elevated Fractional Inspired (Fi)CO2. In healthy volunteers, elevated FiCO2 improves orthostatic tolerance and BP control during rapid postural transitions. Additionally, few have considered sex-difference effects on the chemoreflex-autonomic relationship. Existing evidence demonstrates an augmented sympathetic response to chemoreflex stimulation in postmenopausal women with observed vasoconstriction and increased BPs. These data indicate females may respond better to hypercapnia as a novel therapeutic intervention for NOH. Unfortunately, it may also highlight a predisposition for cardiovascular risk associated with supine hypertension.

To better understand the mechanistic underpinnings of NOH in males and females, and to explore the use of elevated FiCO2 to treat it, researchers need a better way to monitor sympathetic activity and cerebrovascular perfusion. Functional Optical Coherence Tomography (fOCT) of the retinal and choroid vascular beds of the eye (an out crop of the brain) was recently developed in Calgary to allow physiological monitoring of these essential variables. In summary, elevated FiCO2 levels (hypercapnia) appear to improve BP responses to standing and orthostatic tolerance and may constitute an attractive therapy for NOH patients.

This is a proof-of-concept study to evaluate hypercapnia as a novel therapeutic intervention to improve blood pressure and orthostatic tolerance in male and female patients with NOH. In addition, the investigators will aim to evaluate functional OCT as an advance, non-invasive tool to measure sympathetic and metabolic cerebrovascular control.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the current proposal are to apply hypercapnia during fOCT monitoring in male and female patients with NOH and healthy controls to: (a) evaluate and compare the effects of hypercapnia on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to better understand basic chemoreflex and baroreflex physiology in male and female patients with NOH, (b) determine if a device that transiently increases FiCO2 in response to postural changes will have efficacy as a non-drug therapeutic and (c) evaluate fOCT as a novel advanced tool to measure sympathetic and metabolic components of cerebral autoregulation in patients with autonomic failure.

METHODS: Male and female NOH patients (n=40) will be recruited from the Calgary Autonomic Clinic, along with sex and age-matched controls from the community. Participants will complete five Active Stand Tests during which they will be asked to target different end-tidal (ET) CO2 levels. OCT images will be captured throughout each test. Participants will complete the following breathing protocol during an active stand test: a) breathing normal room air (ETCO2 free to fluctuate), b) ETCO2 clamped at baseline, c) ETCO2 clamped at +5mmHg, d) ETCO2 clamped at +10mmHg, e) ETCO2 clamped at +10mmHg with ETO2 clamped at 50mmHg. Target ETCO2 levels will be achieved through a computerized gas delivery system. A rebreathing task to elicit hypercapnia and hypoxia (low oxygen) will be performed last. Each condition will be followed by a minimum 10-minute recovery period to ensure ETCO2 normalization. Hemodynamics (BP, HR and stroke volume) and orthostatic symptoms will be assessed throughout. Breath-by-breath data will include ETO2, ETCO2, respiration rate, tidal volume, and minute ventilation. OCT image analyses in the seated and standing position will measure choroid and retinal (surrogates for peripheral sympathetic activity and metabolic cerebral autoregulation, respectively) perfusion densities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Male and Female
  • Non - smokers.
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent.
  • Ability to travel to Libin Cardiovascular Institute Autonomic Testing Lab at the University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical therapies or medications which could interfere with testing of autonomic function
  • Participants with somatization or severe anxiety symptoms will be excluded
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding females
  • Inability to tolerate mask for the duration of the study
  • Subjects who require portable oxygen at rest or with exercise
  • Subjects with chronic heart failure or severe pulmonary disease who are unable to climb one flight of stairs due to shortness of breath.
  • Presence of failure of other organ systems or systemic illness that can affect autonomic function or the participant's ability to cooperate. These include: dementia, alcohol and/or drug abuse, cerebrovascular disease, kidney or liver disease, surgical procedures where the nerves of the sympathetic nervous system have been cut.
  • Other factors which in the investigator's opinion would prevent the participant from completing the protocol, including poor compliance during previous studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Room Air
All participants will complete an active stand breathing room air with CO2 free to fluctuate
Experimental: +0mmHg CO2 Clamped at baseline
All participants will complete an active stand with their CO2 held constant at baseline
Sequential Gas Delivery will be controlled using the RespirAct™ system (Thornhill Research Inc., Toronto, Canada)
Experimental: +5mmHg CO2
All participants will complete an active stand breathing +5mmHg of CO2 relative to baseline
Sequential Gas Delivery will be controlled using the RespirAct™ system (Thornhill Research Inc., Toronto, Canada)
Experimental: +10mmHg
All participants will complete an active stand breathing +10mmHg of CO2 relative to baseline
Sequential Gas Delivery will be controlled using the RespirAct™ system (Thornhill Research Inc., Toronto, Canada)
Experimental: +10mmHg CO2 + 50mmHg O2
All participants will complete an active stand breathing +10mmHg of CO2 relative to baseline and 50mmHg of O2
Sequential Gas Delivery will be controlled using the RespirAct™ system (Thornhill Research Inc., Toronto, Canada)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Δ Blood Pressure (BP)
Time Frame: The ΔBP (stand-sit) calculated as the average BP in the final minute of sitting and the average BP between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +10mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of ΔBP (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +10mmHg of CO2
The ΔBP (stand-sit) calculated as the average BP in the final minute of sitting and the average BP between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +10mmHg of CO2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Δ Blood Pressure (BP)
Time Frame: The ΔBP (stand-sit) calculated as the average BP in the final minute of sitting and the average BP between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and 0 mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of ΔBP (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs 0 mmHg of CO2
The ΔBP (stand-sit) calculated as the average BP in the final minute of sitting and the average BP between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and 0 mmHg of CO2
Δ Blood Pressure (BP)
Time Frame: The ΔBP (stand-sit) calculated as the average BP in the final minute of sitting and the average BP between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +5mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of ΔBP (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +5mmHg of CO2
The ΔBP (stand-sit) calculated as the average BP in the final minute of sitting and the average BP between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +5mmHg of CO2
Δ Blood Pressure (BP)
Time Frame: The ΔBP (stand-sit) calculated as the average BP in the final minute of sitting and the average BP between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2
Magnitude of ΔBP (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2
The ΔBP (stand-sit) calculated as the average BP in the final minute of sitting and the average BP between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2
Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score [Range: 0 (absent) to 10 (worst)]
Time Frame: The Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (symptoms at the 5th minute of stand - symptoms at the 5th minute of sit) will be compared between room air and +10mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +10mmHg of CO2
The Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (symptoms at the 5th minute of stand - symptoms at the 5th minute of sit) will be compared between room air and +10mmHg of CO2
Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score [Range: 0 (absent) to 10 (worst)]
Time Frame: The Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (symptoms at the 5th minute of stand - symptoms at the 5th minute of sit) will be compared between room air and 0 mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs 0 mmHg of CO2
The Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (symptoms at the 5th minute of stand - symptoms at the 5th minute of sit) will be compared between room air and 0 mmHg of CO2
Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score [Range: 0 (absent) to 10 (worst)]
Time Frame: The Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (symptoms at the 5th minute of stand - symptoms at the 5th minute of sit) will be compared between room air and +5mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +5mmHg of CO2
The Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (symptoms at the 5th minute of stand - symptoms at the 5th minute of sit) will be compared between room air and +5mmHg of CO2
Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score [Range: 0 (absent) to 10 (worst)]
Time Frame: The Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (symptoms at the 5th minute of stand - symptoms at the 5th minute of sit) will be compared between room air and +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2
Magnitude of Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2
The Δ Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score (symptoms at the 5th minute of stand - symptoms at the 5th minute of sit) will be compared between room air and +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2
Δ Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity (CBFv)
Time Frame: The ΔCBFv (stand-sit) calculated as the average CBFv in the final minute of sitting and the average CBFv between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +10mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of ΔCBFv (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +10mmHg of CO2
The ΔCBFv (stand-sit) calculated as the average CBFv in the final minute of sitting and the average CBFv between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +10mmHg of CO2
Δ Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity (CBFv)
Time Frame: The ΔCBFv (stand-sit) calculated as the average CBFv in the final minute of sitting and the average CBFv between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and 0 mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of ΔCBFv (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs 0 mmHg of CO2
The ΔCBFv (stand-sit) calculated as the average CBFv in the final minute of sitting and the average CBFv between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and 0 mmHg of CO2
Δ Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity (CBFv)
Time Frame: The ΔCBFv (stand-sit) calculated as the average CBFv in the final minute of sitting and the average CBFv between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +5mmHg of CO2
Magnitude of ΔCBFv (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +5mmHg of CO2
The ΔCBFv (stand-sit) calculated as the average CBFv in the final minute of sitting and the average CBFv between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +5mmHg of CO2
Δ Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity (CBFv)
Time Frame: The ΔCBFv (stand-sit) calculated as the average CBFv in the final minute of sitting and the average CBFv between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2
Magnitude of ΔCBFv (Stand-Sit) breathing room air vs +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2
The ΔCBFv (stand-sit) calculated as the average CBFv in the final minute of sitting and the average CBFv between minute 3 and 5 of stand will be compared between room air and +10mmHgCO2/50mmHg O2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Satish R Raj, MD, University of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthostatic Hypotension

Clinical Trials on Sequential Gas Delivery

3
Subscribe