CO2 as a Stress Agent for Perfusion Imaging (CO2 STRESS)

March 30, 2021 updated by: Terrence Ruddy, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Effects of Controlled Hypercapnic Stimulation on Myocardial Blood Flow Measured With Positron Emission Tomography

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a nuclear scan using a radioisotope to see blood flow to the muscles of the heart when the heart is at rest and when it is under stress. The stress test in MPI can be done using medications, such as persantine, that dilate coronary arteries and increase blood flow. Similarly, elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the blood, or hypercapnia, also dilates arteries and increases blood flow. Thornhill Research Inc. has developed the RA-MR™ sequential gas delivery system used to control CO2 levels in the blood. The RA-MR™ can deliver precise amounts of CO2 through a mouthpiece for inhalation to increase CO2 levels in the blood and thereby increasing blood flow like during stress.

The objective of this study is to compare the differences in blood flow through the arteries of the heart during stress with hypercapnia and adenosine MPI. The imaging will be done using positron emission tomography (PET) with the radioisotope, or tracer, called Rubidium (Rb-82). The Rb-82 is given through a pump, or elution system.

The investigators hypothesize that hypercapnia will induce a stress-to-rest increase in myocardial blood flow by a factor of 2 or more in myocardial regions supplied by non-stenotic arteries in normal volunteers and participants with coronary artery disease.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
        • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For all participants

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2
  • Able and willing to comply with the study procedures
  • Written informed consent
  • Participants with documented coronary artery disease
  • Stable coronary artery disease on a stable medication regime.
  • Healthy volunteers without known heart disease
  • Low risk of coronary artery disease (CAD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or risk of severe bradycardia (heart rate < 50 beats per minute) not related to chronotropic drugs
  • Known second- or third-degree Atrio-ventricular block without pacemaker
  • Atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation
  • Dyspnea (NYHA III/IV), wheezing asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery within 60 days prior to screening or at any time after consent
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 30 days prior to screening or at any time following consent
  • Acute myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome within 60 days prior to screening or at any time following consent
  • Recent use of dipyridamole, dipyridamole-containing medications (e.g. Aggrenox)
  • Known hypersensitivity to adenosine
  • Breastfeeding or pregnancy
  • Claustrophobia or inability to lie still in a supine position
  • Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Myocardial blood flow quantification

The RA-MR™ Virtual Sequential Gas Delivery System. : delivery of CO2 in increasing levels.

Rubidium Elution System: delivery of Rb-82 through an automated pump system for myocardial PET perfusion imaging.

Persantine stress myocardial PET perfusion imaging: as a standard for comparison.

All participants will undergo a baseline rest Rb-82 positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging scan (MPI) with low-dose computed tomography. Following this baseline study, serial Rb-82 PET MPI using a target level of carbon dioxide (CO2) (approximately 60 mmHg (± 3 mmHg)) as a stress agent will be performed. The 60 mmHg level will be repeated following a minimum 10 minute rest. A rest/stress Rb-82 PET MPI will be performed after return to normal CO2 levels (normocapnea) using persantine as the stress agent.

Myocardial perfusion stress testing

Other Names:
  • the RA-MR™ System
All participants will undergo a baseline rest Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging scan (PET MPI) with low-dose CT. Following this baseline study, serial Rb-82 PET MPI using three target levels of pulmonary end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PetCO2) (approximately 60 mmHg (± 3 mmHg)) as a stress agent will be performed. The 60 mmHg level will be repeated following a minimum 10 minute rest. A second rest Rb-82 PET MPI will be performed after return to normocapnea, followed by a pharmacologic persantine stress Rb-82 PET MPI.
Other Names:
  • Ruby-Fill™

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Myocardial blood flow differences
Time Frame: Difference between baseline rest scan blood flow and hypercapnia stress scan myocardial blood flow at 50 mmHg, 55 mmHg, 60 mmHg levels from baseline. Imaging and intervention analysis will be complete in 4 years.
The myocardial blood flow (MBF) will be quantified with each Rb-82 PET scan done. Polar-maps representing MBF are generated for each rest and stress state using in-house FlowQuant©software. The rest scan will be the baseline. The myocardial blood flow in the four stress scans using hypercapnia as a stress agent will be compared to the rest baseline myocardial blood flow and the adenosine stress scan myocardial blood flow.
Difference between baseline rest scan blood flow and hypercapnia stress scan myocardial blood flow at 50 mmHg, 55 mmHg, 60 mmHg levels from baseline. Imaging and intervention analysis will be complete in 4 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute myocardial blood flow differences between end-tidal CO2 scans
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and 60 mmHg PetCO2. Imaging and intervention analysis will be complete in 4 years.
The effect of increasing doses of pulmonary end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PetCO2) will be measured and quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow using Rb-82 PET will be calculated. Polar-maps representing MBF are generated for each stress state using in-house FlowQuant©software. Five levels will be measured.
Difference between baseline and 60 mmHg PetCO2. Imaging and intervention analysis will be complete in 4 years.
Difference bewteen absolute myocardial blood flow with hypercapnia and with adenosine stress.
Time Frame: Quantification and comparison of the differences in myocardial blood flow with adenosine stress and increasing levels of CO2 as a stress agent. Imaging and intervention analysis will be complete in 4 years.
The effects of hypercapnia and adenosine on absolute myocardial blood flow using Rb-82 PET will be compared. Polar-maps representing MBF are generated for each stress state using in-house FlowQuant©software.
Quantification and comparison of the differences in myocardial blood flow with adenosine stress and increasing levels of CO2 as a stress agent. Imaging and intervention analysis will be complete in 4 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 12, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

3
Subscribe