Pilot Study of a Tailored Model for Implementation of Injury Prevention Training in Youth Handball (the I-PROTECT Model) (I-PROTECT)

November 22, 2023 updated by: Lund University

Tailored Model for Implementation of Injury Prevention Training in Youth Handball Compared With Current Practice: A Pilot Study of the I-PROTECT Model

This pilot study aims to test a tailored model (the I-PROTECT model) for implementation of injury prevention training in youth handball compared with current practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Injury prevention training is effective in reducing musculoskeletal injuries in youth athletes but has had limited public health impact because it is not widely or properly implemented. The lack of involving end-users at the individual and organizational levels is a main contributor to insufficient implementation.

This is a non-randomized pilot study included in the "Implementing injury Prevention training ROutines in TEams and Clubs in youth Team handball (I-PROTECT)" project. The overall aim of I-PROTECT is to achieve wide-spread, sustained and high-fidelity use of evidence-based injury prevention training in youth handball through behavior change at multiple levels within the sports delivery system (individual and organizational levels). The I-PROTECT model is evidence-based, theory-informed, and context-specific injury prevention training specifically tailored for youth handball players, incorporating physical and psychological components and an associated implementation strategy. The process of developing the I-PROTECT model has been described.

In a prospective single-case study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04481958), the I-PROTECT model was implemented and tested in all youth teams (n=19) of two clubs during the 2020/2021 handball season. Due to Covid pandemic restrictions, handball training was only performed for about 2 months, thus, affecting intervention implementation and data collection. To further evaluate, develop, and finalize the I-PROTECT model, we will in the current study conduct pilot testing in clubs not involved in developing the model, before testing the model in a larger scale study.

Two clubs in Sweden offering handball for youth players will be recruited by convenience sampling. One club will use the I-PROTECT model (experimental) and one club will use current practice (control). Intervention will be approx. 6 weeks. Data will be collected among stakeholders (players, coaches, club administrators, caregivers) before, during and after the intervention. Parametric, or non-parametric, tests will be used as appropriate for main and secondary outcomes. Data will be used to calculate sample size in the main outcome for a larger scale study as well as to assess implementation determinants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

597

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lund, Sweden, 22100
        • Eva Ageberg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Stakeholders (players, coaches, caregivers, club administrators) of all youth teams (13-17 years) in two community handball clubs will be eligible for participation.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Players: ages 13-17 years and training ≥2 times/week in a team
  • Coaches: leading ≥1 training session/week
  • Caregivers: directly associated with the eligible players
  • Club administrators: engagement in the issues of sports injury, coach education or policy development for youth players

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Employed/paid players
  • Stakeholder other than the groups listed in inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: I-PROTECT model
The I-PROTECT model is an end-user-driven intervention including evidence-based, theory-informed, and context-specific injury prevention training for youth handball, and an associated implementation strategy.
The I-PROTECT model is based on existing research and knowledge of experts in sport medicine, sport psychology and implementation science, with the involvement of end-users throughout the process. The interdisciplinary intervention includes exercises based on physical and psychological principles of effective injury prevention training, specifically tailored for youth handball players, and support for developing a continuous implementation strategy. The intervention is delivered through a mobile application specifically developed for the I-PROTECT project (the I-PROTECT GO), including coach, player, club administrator, and caregiver modules. Coaches are introduced to the intervention in a workshop, and they will conduct the exercises with their teams during handball practice. Players will have support for conducting exercises on their own, and club administrators for developing an implementation strategy. Caregivers will have tailored information about injury prevention training.
Active Comparator: Control group
Youth coaches in the control group club will be asked to use injury prevention training available in the coach education material ("Ready for handball"), i.e., current practice in Sweden.
Youth coaches in the control group club will be asked to use injury prevention training available in the coach education material ("Ready for handball"), i.e., current practice in Sweden.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of injury prevention training
Time Frame: Study start up to end of study (6 weeks)
Frequency of injury prevention training on a team level, reported by coaches weekly (0, 1, 2, 3 or more session/week). Using injury prevention training for two session or more per week at regular handball training over the intervention period will signify that injury prevention is implemented in a team (binary outcome: ≥2 per week or <2 per week).
Study start up to end of study (6 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adoption and fidelity (coaches)
Time Frame: Study start up to end of study (6 weeks)
Coaches' weekly report if they have followed the program as intended.
Study start up to end of study (6 weeks)
Implementation determinants
Time Frame: After study end at approx. 6 weeks
Questionnaire or interview data for implementation determinants will be collected for all stakeholders (players, coaches, caregivers, club representatives). Questions aligned with the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) theory and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework will be adapted to each stakeholder group. Data will also be gathered (e.g., focus groups interviews) to enable an in-depth understanding of potential barriers and facilitators, acceptability, usability, and sustainability of the I-PROTECT model, including its packaging, and of potential barriers for filling in questionnaires.
After study end at approx. 6 weeks
Implementation determinants
Time Frame: Baseline
Questionnaire data for implementation determinants will be collected for coaches and caregivers. Questions aligned with the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) theory and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework will be adapted to each stakeholder group.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eva Ageberg, PhD, Prof, Lund University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-02952
  • 2014/713 (Other Identifier: Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, Sweden)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Share published data on reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Athletic Injuries

Clinical Trials on I-PROTECT model

Subscribe