- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05307393
Maternal Positioning to Correct Fetal Occiput Posterior
August 15, 2022 updated by: Northwell Health
Maternal Positioning to Correct Fetal Occiput Posterior in the First Stage of Labor
In evaluating a patient's ability to have a normal vaginal delivery, a practitioner must consider three factors.
Commonly referred to as the three P's, these include Power (contractions), Passage (pelvis and soft tissue) and passenger (baby).
Power can be controlled through induction and augmentation agents.
Passage is determined by the women's body habitus.
Passenger includes the baby's estimated fetal weight (EFW) and position.
Throughout the history of obstetrics, the baby's position has been a factor that has acted as a strong predictor of a woman's ability to deliver vaginally.
Several researchers have looked into the percentage of babies born in the Occiput Anterior (fetus facing down) vs. Occiput Posterior (fetus facing up aka "sunny side up") position.
Studies have shown that the majority of babies are born in OA position and that the finding of an OA positioned baby is associated with a greater likelihood of a successful vaginal delivery.
OP position is associated with higher risk of 3rd and 4th degree perineal lacerations, operative delivery (vacuum/forceps) and cesarean section.
Therefore OP position poses a higher risk of morbidity to the patient and fetus.
Multiple studies exist in the obstetrics and midwifery literature regarding maternal positioning to correct fetal malposition.
Many of these studies have shown no significance and those that do have generated conflicting results and are consistently lacking in power.
The aim of this prospective study is to determine if maternal positioning to either the side of fetal movement (contralateral/opposite to the fetal spine) or opposite of the side of fetal movement (ipsilateral to the fetal spine) during the first stage of labor is associated with correction of fetal OP to OA position.
Upon admission to labor and delivery, following an initial ultrasound to confirm fetal OP position, women in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups; one control (Group A), and two experimental (Groups B and C) groups.
Those assigned to Group A will be allowed to remain in any position they chose during their labor and delivery course.
Group B will be placed in a dorsal recumbent, modified sims position on the side of fetal movement.
Group C, will be placed in the same position but opposite that of which fetal kicks are felt.
Subjects in the experimental group will be asked to remain in these positions throughout the majority of their labor and delivery course, up until the second stage of labor (10 cm dilated).
They will be allowed to change positions for up to 10 min per hour for maternal comfort and any fetal resuscitation efforts.
Anything longer than this will be considered a deviation from the protocol and will be documented as such, but all necessary intervention for fetal well-being will be allowed including changes in maternal position for longer than 10 minutes.
Once a cervical dilation of 10cm is achieved all study interventions will be discontinued.
Peanut balls and manual rotational maneuvers will not be allowed as they are considered confounding factors which may individually affect fetal position.
Data will be collected from the hospital record.
This data will include: maternal age, BMI, race, maternal medical complications, delivery type, laceration, fetal position at delivery, dilation on admission and weight of the baby.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
465
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Emma Brenner, MD
- Phone Number: 7184707660
- Email: ebrenner@northwell.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Emma Brenner, MD
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11040
- Long Island Jewish Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women who are >/=18yo
- able to consent
- >/=37 weeks gestation (full term) with a viable singleton intrauterine pregnancy noted to be cephalic presentation in the OP position at the time of admission as noted on bedside ultrasound
- All patients must be <10cm, with a score of 3 or less out of 10 on a numeric pain rating scale
- admitted to LIJ or NSUH for either spontaneous labor or labor induction.
Exclusion Criteria:
- All women younger than 18yo
- unable to consent
- admitted in the second stage of labor (>10cm) or beyond, with nonviable pregnancies (i.e. IUFD), score of 4 or more on a numeric pain rating scale, or desiring cesarean section will be excluded.
- all women with pregnancies noted to have IUGR, fetal anomalies, malpresentation (i.e. breech), multiple gestations or fetuses not in the OP position at time of admission will be excluded.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: A
|
|
|
Experimental: B
Group B will be placed in a dorsal recumbent, modified sims position on the side of fetal movement.
|
Upon admission to labor and delivery, following an initial ultrasound to confirm fetal OP position, women in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups; one control (Group A), and two experimental (Groups B and C) groups.
Those assigned to Group A will be allowed to remain in any position they chose during their labor and delivery course.
Group B will be placed in a dorsal recumbent, modified sims position on the side of fetal movement.
Group C, will be placed in the same position but opposite that of which fetal kicks are felt.
|
|
Experimental: C
Group C, will be placed in the same position but opposite that of which fetal kicks are felt.
|
Upon admission to labor and delivery, following an initial ultrasound to confirm fetal OP position, women in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups; one control (Group A), and two experimental (Groups B and C) groups.
Those assigned to Group A will be allowed to remain in any position they chose during their labor and delivery course.
Group B will be placed in a dorsal recumbent, modified sims position on the side of fetal movement.
Group C, will be placed in the same position but opposite that of which fetal kicks are felt.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fetal Position at time of delivery
Time Frame: From time of admission to delivery
|
Rate of OA position in each arm at time of delivery
|
From time of admission to delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mode of delivery
Time Frame: From time of admission to delivery
|
Vaginal delivery rates in each arm
|
From time of admission to delivery
|
|
Laceration Type
Time Frame: From time of admission to delivery
|
Incidence of 3rd and 4th degree lacerations in each arm
|
From time of admission to delivery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Valerie Schulz, MD, Northwell Health
- Principal Investigator: Sarah Pachtman, MD, Northwell Health
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
January 1, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
January 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 24, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
April 1, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 18, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 15, 2022
Last Verified
August 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21-0519
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Obstetric Complication
-
OASIS Diagnostics S.A.National Center for Research and Development, PolandCompletedObstetric Complication | Delivery Complication | Obstetric Anal Sphincter InjurySpain, Czechia, Poland, Slovakia
-
OASIS Diagnostics S.A.CompletedObstetric Complication | Delivery Complication | Obstetric Anal Sphincter InjuryPoland
-
University of DodomaStephen Kibusi; James Tumaini KengiaNot yet recruitingObstetric Complication | Woman's RoleTanzania
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedCommunication | Obstetric Complication | High Risk Pregnancy | Multidisciplinary CommunicationUnited States
-
JhpiegoGE HealthcareCompletedObstetric Labor Complications | Newborn Morbidity | Obstetric ComplicationKenya
-
Cukurova UniversityNot yet recruitingObstetric Complication
-
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ModenaUnknown
-
Newcastle UniversityCompletedUltrasound | Obstetric Complication | Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn | Fetal Growth ComplicationsUnited Kingdom
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceWithdrawn
-
London North West Healthcare NHS TrustImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustNot yet recruitingMental Health Impairment | Obstetric Complication | Incontinence | Perineal Tear | Obstetric Trauma | Relation, Mother-Child | Relation, FamilyUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Positioning
-
Poudre Valley Health SystemRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedPneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
-
Yuhu MaNot yet recruitingPostoperative Hypoxemia | Position Differences
-
University of MichiganCompleted
-
University of Health Sciences Balikesir Hospital...Not yet recruitingGeriatric | Hypotension Drug-Induced | Spinal Aneshtesia | Orthopedic Surgery Patients
-
University of TennesseeRecruitingLabor Onset and Length Abnormalities | Labor Long | Prolonged Labor | Labor; PoorUnited States
-
Ayub Medical College, AbbottabadAyub Teaching HospitalCompletedCOVID-19 Pneumonia | COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Prone PositioningPakistan
-
University Magna GraeciaCompletedUrinary IncontinenceItaly
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College, London; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation... and other collaboratorsRecruitingObstructive Sleep Apnea | Cleft PalateUnited Kingdom
-
Universitätsklinikum KölnWithdrawnInsufficiency; Cardiac, Complicating SurgeryGermany