Clinical Evaluation of Two Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

April 17, 2023 updated by: CooperVision, Inc.
This study is to compare the short-term clinical performance and subjective acceptance of two silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a double-masked, randomized, bilateral crossover study to compare the short-term clinical performance of two silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses. Each lens type is worn for approximately six hours on separate study days, in random sequence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. They are aged between 18 and 40 years.
  2. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  3. They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  4. They have successfully worn contact lenses within six months of starting the study.
  5. They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study contact lenses.
  6. They have a contact lens spherical prescription between -0.25 to - 6.00D (inclusive) based on the ocular refraction.
  7. They have a spectacle cylindrical correction of -0.75D or less in each eye based on the ocular refraction.
  8. They own and habitually wear single vision spectacles.
  9. They can attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye, with the study lenses.
  10. They agree not to participate in other clinical research while enrolled on this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. They have an ocular disorder which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  2. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  3. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  4. They are aphakic.
  5. They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  6. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  7. They are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  8. They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (eg HIV) or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
  9. They have grade 3 or greater of any of the following ocular surface signs: corneal oedema, corneal vascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal conjunctival changes or any other abnormality, which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  10. They have taken part in any other clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study, which may impact on this particular work.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lens A, Then Lens B
Participants will wear Lens A for six hours and then cross over to wear Lens B for six hours.
6 hours
6 hours
Experimental: Lens B, Then Lens A
Participants will wear Lens B for six hours and then cross over to wear Lens A for six hours.
6 hours
6 hours

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ease of Lens Insertion
Time Frame: 6 hours
Ease of Lens Insertion is measured on a scale of 0-100 (0-Unmanageable, Lenses impossible to insert; 100-Excellent. No problems with lens insertion)
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philip Morgan, PhD,MCOptom, Eurolens Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C21-706 (EX-MKTG-127)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on Lens A (comfilcon A lens)

Subscribe