Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Treated With Premixed Bio-ceramic MTA Versus Formocresol

April 2, 2022 updated by: Sarah Abdelbar Mahmoud

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Treated With Premixed Bio-ceramic MTA Versus Formocresol Among a Group of Egyptian Children: A Pilot Study.

examine the results of pulpotomy in primary molars using premixed bioceramic MTA versus Formocresol. Clinical and radiographic success rates were used as outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Primary outcome:

Soft-tissue pathology

  • Post-treatment swelling will be assessed through visual examination by the operator, either intraorally or extra orally.
  • Sinus tract or fistula will be assessed through visual examination by the operator

Secondary outcomes:

  1. Pain to the percussion will be assessed by gentle tapping on the tooth with the end of a dental mirror
  2. mobility will be assessed through the back of two mirrors
  3. radiographic assessments:- for any radiolucency and pathologic root resorption (periapical or bifurcation) will be examined (present or not).

clinical assessment on every recall visit during the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up period.

• These radiographic assessments will be performed as baseline data at the first visit following the operating procedure, as well as at 3, 6, and 12 months after the baseline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medically fit and cooperative children.
  • Pediatric patients aged 4-6 years.
  • A deep carious lesion in vital primary molars.
  • Absence of clinical signs and symptoms of pulpal exposure.
  • Absence of radiographic signs and symptoms of people degeneration.
  • Positive parental informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Uncooperative children.

  • Medically compromised children.
  • Presence of clinical signs and symptoms of pulpal exposure.
  • Presence of radiographic signs and symptoms of pulp degeneration.
  • Physiologic root resorption more than one-third.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: control group
the group that have caries in primary molars and treat them with formocresol
dressing agents in pulpotomized primary molas using formocresol in cariously exposed vital primary molars
Experimental: experimental group
the group that have caries in primary molars and treat them with premixed bioceramic MTA
dressing agents in pulpotomized primary molas using premixed bioceramic MTA in cariously exposed vital primary molars
Other Names:
  • Neoputty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Soft-tissue pathology
Time Frame: at 0 day
  • Post-treatment swelling will be assessed through visual examination by the operator, either intraorally or extra orally.
  • Sinus tract or fistula will be assessed through visual examination by the operator.

Binary (present or absent)

at 0 day
Soft-tissue pathology
Time Frame: at 3 month
  • Post-treatment swelling will be assessed through visual examination by the operator, either intraorally or extra orally.
  • Sinus tract or fistula will be assessed through visual examination by the operator.

Binary (present or absent)

at 3 month
Soft-tissue pathology
Time Frame: at 6 month
  • Post-treatment swelling will be assessed through visual examination by the operator, either intraorally or extra orally.
  • Sinus tract or fistula will be assessed through visual examination by the operator.

Binary (present or absent)

at 6 month
Soft-tissue pathology
Time Frame: at 1 year

Post-treatment swelling will be assessed through visual examination by the operator, either intraorally or extra orally.

-Sinus tract or fistula will be assessed through visual examination by the operator.

Binary (present or absent)

at 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
• Pain to the percussion
Time Frame: at 0 day

will be assessed by gentle tapping on the tooth with the end of a dental mirror.

Binary (present or absent)

at 0 day
• Pain to the percussion
Time Frame: at 3 month

will be assessed by gentle tapping on the tooth with the end of a dental mirror.

Binary (present or absent)

at 3 month
• Pain to the percussion
Time Frame: at 6 month

will be assessed by gentle tapping on the tooth with the end of a dental mirror.

Binary (present or absent)

at 6 month
• Pain to the percussion
Time Frame: at 1 year

will be assessed by gentle tapping on the tooth with the end of a dental mirror.

Binary (present or absent)

at 1 year
mobility
Time Frame: at 0 day

• Mobility is scored on a scale of 1-3 as follows:

  1. the movement that is greater than normal (physiological) movement.
  2. a maximum of 1 mm in the buccolingual direction.
  3. depreciable buccolingual movement of more than 1 mm. Miller's Grades
at 0 day
mobility
Time Frame: at 3 month

• Mobility is scored on a scale of 1-3 as follows:

  1. the movement that is greater than normal (physiological) movement.
  2. a maximum of 1 mm in the buccolingual direction.
  3. depreciable buccolingual movement of more than 1 mm. Miller's Grades
at 3 month
mobility
Time Frame: at 6 month

• Mobility is scored on a scale of 1-3 as follows:

  1. the movement that is greater than normal (physiological) movement.
  2. a maximum of 1 mm in the buccolingual direction.
  3. depreciable buccolingual movement of more than 1 mm. Miller's Grades
at 6 month
mobility
Time Frame: at 1 year

• Mobility is scored on a scale of 1-3 as follows:

  1. the movement that is greater than normal (physiological) movement.
  2. a maximum of 1 mm in the buccolingual direction.
  3. depreciable buccolingual movement of more than 1 mm. Miller's Grades
at 1 year
radiographic indications of radiolucency and pathologic root resorption (periapical or bifurcation) will be examined (present or not).
Time Frame: at 0 day
Binary (present or absent)
at 0 day
radiographic indications of radiolucency and pathologic root resorption (periapical or bifurcation) will be examined (present or not).
Time Frame: at 3 month
Binary (present or absent)
at 3 month
radiographic indications of radiolucency and pathologic root resorption (periapical or bifurcation) will be examined (present or not).
Time Frame: at 6 month
Binary (present or absent)
at 6 month
radiographic indications of radiolucency and pathologic root resorption (periapical or bifurcation) will be examined (present or not).
Time Frame: at 1 year
Binary (present or absent)
at 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: ahmed m Elkhadem, Ass.Prof, Cairo university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 203 (UNIMIB Ethic Commettee)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Caries

Clinical Trials on Formocresol

Subscribe