Intralesional Versus Intramuscular Methotrexate for Non-melanoma Skin Cancers

April 6, 2022 updated by: Basma Magdy Elkholy, MD, Zagazig University

Intralesional Methotrexate Versus Intramuscular Methotrexate in the Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancers

to compare the effectiveness and safety of intralesional vs. systemic MTX in NMSC management

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Intralesional methotrexate (MTX) could to be promising conservative alternative for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Systemic MTX was attempted as adjuvant for locally-advanced NMSC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sharkia
      • Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt, 44519
        • Zagazig University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult patients of both sexes with histologically-confirmed primary or recurrent non- metastatic NMSCs of different types (BCC,SCC, and/or KA), sites, number, sizes and duration were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Hypersensitivity reactions to methotrexate, liver or kidney disease, immunosuppressive conditions, HIV, HBV, and HCV infection, hematological abnormalities and metastasis. Pregnant or lactating women, females in their child-bearing period not using or refusing contraceptive methods, and those who had any other form of NMSC management in the month preceding enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intralesional methotrexate
Group A 30 patients received intralesional injection of MTX with an insulin syringe into the tumor at a dose ranging between 12.5 mg to 25 mg according to the tumor size every week until complete improvement or for a maximum of 8 sessions.
A randomized comparative effectiveness clinical trial
Active Comparator: Intramuscular methotrexate
Group B 30 patients received systemic MTX (SC, or IM) was injected at a dose of 25 mg every week until clearance or for a maximum of 8 sessions.
A randomized comparative effectiveness clinical trial

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in size and number of tumors
Time Frame: up to 1 month after the last session
Patients were divided into 3 groups: responders (if the tumor has regressed by > 50%), partial responders (tumor regression < 50%), and non- responders (no improvement at all or worsening).
up to 1 month after the last session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Starting from the first session and up to 6-months after the last session
Starting from the first session and up to 6-months after the last session
Recurrence
Time Frame: till the end of follow up duration (6 months)
after achieving response greater than 50% of the tumor
till the end of follow up duration (6 months)
New NMSC lesions elsewhere
Time Frame: from the start of the study and till the end of follow up period (6 months)
from the start of the study and till the end of follow up period (6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe