- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05338866
Chemotherapy Combined With High-dose Radiotherapy for Low Rectal Cancer Using MR Guided Linear Accelerator
Chemotherapy Combined With High-dose Radiotherapy for Low Rectal Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Guided Radiotherapy Linear Accelerator:A Prospective Phase 2 Trial
The incidence rate of colorectal cancer is third in male tumors and second in female tumors. The newly diagnosed incidence of colorectal cancer is no less than 100 thousand in China, which poses a great threat to people's health and a heavy burden of public health. Preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with radical surgery is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer. Low rectal cancer accounts for about one third of all rectal cancer cases. Due to the particularity of its location,surgical complications and postoperative patients need permanent colostomy (artificial anus) to solve the defecation problems, which has a serious impact on the patients' work and life. How to improve the quality of life of patients without reducing the survival rate has become an important topic in the treatment of low rectal cancer. Previous studies have shown that the prognosis of patients with pathological complete remission (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is optimistic. The clinical efficacy of "observation and waiting" is good. The results of small sample exploratory clinical studies of radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy for low rectal cancer are satisfactory, and MR-linear accelerator can be used for precision radiotherapy for colorectal cancer.
This study is aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of radical radiotherapy boost for low rectal cancer by using magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy system, and further evaluate the impact of boost on the quality of life of patients.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
It is a prospective phase II, non-randomized controlled designed clinical study. For the optimal design, 58 cases of low rectal adenocarcinoma without metastasis were divided into queue 1 and queue 2 according to the start time of boost. MR-linear accelerator was used for dose boost of the local tumor region to make it reaching the radical radiotherapy dose. At the same time, fluorouracil based chemotherapy was given according to stages.
The primary endpoint was 3-year progression free survival rate. The secondary end points were 3-year stoma free survival rate, 3-year local regeneration rate, 3-year disease-free survival rate, 3-year distant metastasis rate, 3-year overall survival rate, short term and long-term toxic and side effects, and patients' quality of life scale 1-3 years after treatment.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed as rectal adenocarcinoma.
- MRI and / or electronic colonoscopy confirmed that the lower edge of the tumor was ≤ 5cm from the anal edge.
- The AJCC clinical stage was cT1-4NxM0, with or without MRF positive and EMVI positive.
- MSI gene detection or MMR protein immunohistochemical detection was MSS / PMMR.
- No obvious signs of intestinal obstruction or intestinal obstruction has been relieved after proximal colostomy.
- Age: 18 ~ 80 years old.
- ECOG score: 0-1.
- Expected life: more than 3 years.
- Hematology: WBC > 3 × 109/L; PLT>80 × 109/L; Hb>90g/L.
- Liver function: ALT and AST were less than 2 times of normal value; Bilirubin is less than 1.5 times of normal value.
- Renal function: creatinine is less than 1.5 times of normal value or creatinine clearance rate (CCR) ≥ 60ml / min.
- Patient who has not received tumor resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy or other anti-tumor treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- There are any conditions that make MRI impossible.
- There are serious medical complications.
- Uncontrolled infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases and mental diseases.
- Any unstable condition or situation that may endanger patient safety and compliance.
- Pregnant or lactating women who are fertile and do not take adequate contraceptive measures.
- Refuse to sign informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Cohort 1. Cohort 2
A total of 6 courses of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine chemotherapy and 2 courses of capecitabine single drug chemotherapy were performed. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy starts at the second cycle. Cohort 1: For patients with low rectal cancer who refused surgery before the initial diagnosis and treatment, the first stage of radiotherapy used conventional linear accelerated radiotherapy, with doses of GTV 50Gy/25f and CTV 45Gy/25f for 5-6 weeks. Subsequently, the second stage of radiotherapy boost was continued with MR linear accelerator, and the dose was GTV 16~20Gy/8~10f for 2 weeks. Cohort 2: For locally advanced low rectal cancer patients who did not achieve clinical complete remission 6-8 weeks after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and refused surgery, radiotherapy was given in the first stage at the doses of GTV 50Gy/25f and CTV 45Gy/25f for 5-6 weeks. In the second stage, MR linear accelerator was used for radiotherapy boosting, and the dose was GTV 30Gy/15f for 3 weeks. |
Radical radiotherapy boosting for low rectal cancer through magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy linear accelerator.
For patients with AJCC stage II and III and age < 72 years old, Capox ×6→capecitabine×2. Detailed usage: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 (reduced to 100mg/m2 during concurrent chemoradiotherapy), intravenous administration, d1. Capecitabine 1000mg / m2, twice a day, d1-14. Repeated every 3 weeks. For patients aged ≥ 72 years, or the competent physician judges that the patients cannot tolerate dual drug combined chemotherapy, capecitabine ×8 courses. For patients with AJCC stage I, capecitabine ×4 courses.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
3-year progression free survival rate
Time Frame: 3-year after enrollment
|
Percentage of survive patients with no disease progression or death after 3 years from enrollment.
|
3-year after enrollment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
3-year stoma free survival rate
Time Frame: 3-year after enrollment
|
Percentage of patients survive with no enterostomy after 3 years from enrollment.
|
3-year after enrollment
|
|
3-year local regeneration rate
Time Frame: 3-year after enrollment
|
Percentage of patients with no local tumor regeneration after 3 years from enrollment.
|
3-year after enrollment
|
|
3-year disease-free survival rate
Time Frame: 3-year after enrollment
|
The percentage of patients survive with no disease after 3 years from enrollment
|
3-year after enrollment
|
|
3-year distant metastasis rate
Time Frame: 3-year after enrollment
|
The percentage of patients with distant metastasis.
|
3-year after enrollment
|
|
3-year overall survival rate
Time Frame: 3-year after enrollment
|
The percentage of patients survive 3 years after enrollment
|
3-year after enrollment
|
|
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time Frame: During treatment. 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year after treatment.
|
Acute and chronic toxic and side effects
|
During treatment. 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year after treatment.
|
|
Patients' quality of life scale
Time Frame: Before and during treatment. 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year after enrollment.
|
Patients' quality of life scale
|
Before and during treatment. 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year after enrollment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yuanhong Gao, PhD, Sun Yat-sen University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694.
- Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
- Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C, Becker H, Raab HR, Villanueva MT, Witzigmann H, Wittekind C, Beissbarth T, Rodel C. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
- Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, Lammering G, Nelemans PJ, Engelen SM, van Dam RM, Jansen RL, Sosef M, Leijtens JW, Hulsewe KW, Buijsen J, Beets GL. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 10;29(35):4633-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7176. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
- Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Quirke P, Couture J, de Metz C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Griffiths G, Thompson LC, Parmar M. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):811-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0.
- Wang Q, Zhang S, Zhou C, et al. Efficacy and safety of high dose radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2020. 108(3): e644-e645
- Glimelius B, Tiret E, Cervantes A, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi81-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt240. No abstract available.
- Galandiuk S, Wieand HS, Moertel CG, Cha SS, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Jan;174(1):27-32.
- Heald RJ, Ryall R. Recurrent cancer after restorative resection of the rectum. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Mar 13;284(6318):826-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6318.826-e. No abstract available.
- Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O'Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, Kahlenberg MS, Baez-Diaz L, Ursiny CS, Petrelli NJ, Wolmark N. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5124-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
- Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Bekaii-Saab T, Chan E, Chen YJ, Cooper HS, Engstrom PF, Enzinger PC, Fenton MJ, Fuchs CS, Grem JL, Grothey A, Hochster HS, Hunt S, Kamel A, Kirilcuk N, Leong LA, Lin E, Messersmith WA, Mulcahy MF, Murphy JD, Nurkin S, Rohren E, Ryan DP, Saltz L, Sharma S, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous CT, Stoffel EM, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Willett CG, Gregory KM, Freedman-Cass D. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Jun;13(6):719-28; quiz 728. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0087.
- Sautter-Bihl ML, Hohenberger W, Fietkau R, Rodel C, Schmidberger H, Sauer R. Rectal cancer : when is the local recurrence risk low enough to refrain from the aim to prevent it? Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Feb;189(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0299-5.
- Feddern ML, Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Life with a stoma after curative resection for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;17(11):1011-7. doi: 10.1111/codi.13041.
- Konanz J, Herrle F, Weiss C, Post S, Kienle P. Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer--a matched-pair analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;28(5):679-88. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1683-z. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
- Lim L, Chao M, Shapiro J, Millar JL, Kipp D, Rezo A, Fong A, Jones IT, McLaughlin S, Gibbs P. Long-term outcomes of patients with localized rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone because of medical inoperability or patient refusal. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Dec;50(12):2032-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9062-x. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
- Gao YH, Lin JZ, An X, Luo JL, Cai MY, Cai PQ, Kong LH, Liu GC, Tang JH, Chen G, Pan ZZ, Ding PR. Neoadjuvant sandwich treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine administered prior to, concurrently with, and following radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective phase 2 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
- Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, Sabbaga J, Ribeiro U Jr, Silva e Sousa AH Jr, Campos FG, Kiss DR, Gama-Rodrigues J. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):711-7; discussion 717-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141194.27992.32.
- Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I, Campos FG, Nadalin W, Kiss D, Gama-Rodrigues J. Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Dec;10(10):1319-28; discussion 1328-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.09.005.
- Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, Sao Juliao GP, Proscurshim I, Sabbagh C, Lynn PB, Perez RO. Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
- van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Beets GL, Figueiredo NL, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Renehan AG, van de Velde CJH; IWWD Consortium. Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2537-2545. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31078-X.
- Smith JJ, Strombom P, Chow OS, Roxburgh CS, Lynn P, Eaton A, Widmar M, Ganesh K, Yaeger R, Cercek A, Weiser MR, Nash GM, Guillem JG, Temple LKF, Chalasani SB, Fuqua JL, Petkovska I, Wu AJ, Reyngold M, Vakiani E, Shia J, Segal NH, Smith JD, Crane C, Gollub MJ, Gonen M, Saltz LB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Paty PB. Assessment of a Watch-and-Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer in Patients With a Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):e185896. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5896. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
- Appelt AL, Ploen J, Harling H, Jensen FS, Jensen LH, Jorgensen JC, Lindebjerg J, Rafaelsen SR, Jakobsen A. High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):919-27. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00120-5. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
- Dizdarevic E, Frostrup Hansen T, Ploen J, Henrik Jensen L, Lindebjerg J, Rafaelsen S, Jakobsen A, Appelt A. Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After High-Dose Chemoradiation Therapy for Nonsurgical Management of Distal Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Mar 1;106(3):556-563. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.046. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
- Intven MPW, de Mol van Otterloo SR, Mook S, Doornaert PAH, de Groot-van Breugel EN, Sikkes GG, Willemsen-Bosman ME, van Zijp HM, Tijssen RHN. Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer; feasibility of the workflow on a 1.5T MR-linac: clinical implementation and initial experience. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jan;154:172-178. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Intestinal Diseases
- Intestinal Neoplasms
- Rectal Diseases
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antimetabolites
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Capecitabine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-FXY-489
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterNovartis Pharmaceuticals; National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Recurrent Rectal CancerUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityCompletedRectal Cancer Stage | Rectal Cancer PatientsChina
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingEvaluation of Quality of Life and Utilities Following Surgical Treatment of Stage I-IV Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Rectal AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNatera, Inc.; The Joseph Drown FoundationRecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Locally...United States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingMetastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Rectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditionsUnited States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteNatera, Inc.RecruitingEstablishing a ctDNA Biomarker to Improve Organ Preserving Strategies in Patients With Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health and Science University; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Active, not recruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedFatigue | Depressive Symptoms | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Psychosocial Effects of Cancer and Its Treatment | Stage IIIA Colon Cancer | Stage IIIB Colon Cancer | Stage IIIC Colon... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy...RecruitingBrain MetastasesChina
-
University of ZurichActive, not recruitingPelvic and Para-aortic Lymph Node MetastasesSwitzerland
-
University Hospital HeidelbergRecruitingHepatic MetastasisGermany
-
Imperial College LondonInSightecWithdrawnPregnancy | Uterine FibroidsUnited Kingdom
-
Rambam Health Care CampusUnknownAmputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Residual LimbsIsrael
-
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho HospitalUnknownMagnetic Resonance Guided Interventional ProceduresTaiwan
-
Joshua KanterActive, not recruitingAortic Stenosis | Atrial Septal Defect | Aortic Coarctation | Patent Ductus Arteriosus | Cardiomyopathy | Post Heart Transplant Catheter ProcedureUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedLevodopa Induced Dyskinesia in Patients With Parkinson's DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
UMC UtrechtTerminated
-
University Health Network, TorontoActive, not recruitingSolid Tumors and Metastatic LesionsCanada