TIME™ at Home Feasibility Study: Evaluation of a Virtually Delivered, Community-based, Task-oriented Exercise Program

May 16, 2023 updated by: Dr. Nancy Salbach, University of Toronto

Feasibility and Potential Benefits of a Virtually Delivered, Community-based, Task-oriented Exercise Program (TIME™ at Home) for People With Balance and Mobility Limitations

Balance and mobility limitations can lead to increased difficulty with everyday function and increased dependence on caregivers. Adults with balance and mobility limitations need access to safe and beneficial exercise programs to maintain or improve their health. Task-oriented exercise programs designed for adults with balance and mobility limitations incorporating a healthcare-community partnership, are safe and feasible to implement in the community setting. In this model, trained fitness instructors deliver the exercise program, and a registered healthcare professional in a healthcare partner role provides ongoing support through class visits, email communication with instructors, and program referrals. One example is Together in Movement and Exercise (TIME™) program which was developed by physical therapists at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network (TRI-UHN). Research has shown that the in-person TIME™ program has the potential to improve everyday function, independence, and social participation in people with neurological conditions. Virtual delivery of these programs is needed to address barriers to attending in-person exercise programs. Barriers can include inadequate access to transportation, inclement weather, distance to community centres, and community centre closures during pandemic situations.

This is a before-and-after study to evaluate the potential benefit, safety, and feasibility of the virtual TIME™ program (called at TIME™ at Home), delivered using a group-based, 8-week program format, among people with balance and mobility limitations. Also, the aim is to describe the experiences of participants, caregivers, healthcare partners, and program facilitators and coordinators with the program to make recommendations for improvement.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Balance and mobility limitations can adversely affect everyday functioning and accelerate dependence on caregivers leading to institutionalization. Previous literature has suggested that a group, task-oriented community-based exercise program (CBEP), targeting balance and mobility (i.e., capacity for walking, transfers, sit-to-stand, stairs), implemented through an innovative healthcare-community partnership (CBEP-HCP), has the potential to improve everyday function, independence and social participation in persons with stroke. The Together in Movement and Exercise (TIME™) program is a licensed, group, task-oriented community-based exercise program incorporating a healthcare-community partnership for adults with balance and mobility limitations. Physical therapists at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network (TRI-UHN), developed the TIME™ program. Trained fitness instructors deliver the exercise program face-to-face (in-person) in community centres and a healthcare professional who serves as a healthcare partner provides ongoing support. The program has been offered in over 50 community centres across Canada.

Virtual delivery of CBEP-HCPs is needed to address barriers to attending in-person exercise programs among people with balance and mobility limitations. Barriers can include inadequate access to transportation, inclement weather, distance to community centres, and community centre closures during pandemic situations.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the investigators used an iterative process to develop an online version of the TIME™ program, called TIME™ at Home. TIME™ at Home is a standardized, community-based program licensed by the UHN involving the delivery of video-based task-oriented exercises. The exercises in the video were adapted from the classic in-person TIME™ program and were considered safe for people with balance and mobility limitations to perform at home. In addition to a warm-up and cool-down, the video shows a physical therapist and an occupational therapist performing each exercise at two difficulty levels. Participants are asked to self-pace and self-select the difficulty level that feels right for them. A trained facilitator at a community organization streams the video for people with balance and mobility limitations using Zoom.

The TIME™ at Home program, due to its virtual nature, has potential to improve exercise participation in remote and isolated settings. Unlike the in-person program, it does not require participants to be physically present at a community centre, thus eliminating some common barriers like lack of (adaptive) transportation, difficulty with transportation during inclement weather, long travel times to community centres from rural settings, and inadequate building access. The program can be delivered at home with minimal equipment. Also, the program involves showing standardized exercise videos developed by physical therapists and occupational therapists at TRI-UHN which prevents the need to train fitness instructors to deliver the program. Therefore, TIME™ at Home has potential for reducing barriers encountered with delivering in-person standardized exercise programs in community-based settings.

Pilot research to date on the TIME™ at Home Program (Virtual Program)

Program developers at TRI-UHN in collaboration with our research group have evaluated the feasibility of components of the virtual TIME™ at Home Program in partnership with the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada and Abilities Centre in Whitby (Ontario). Findings support the safety of delivering TIME™ at Home using a drop-in format. The safety, feasibility, and potential benefit of a group-based format, class visits from a healthcare partner, and a post-class social time to facilitate social support, have not been comprehensively evaluated.

Thus, the study objectives are:

  1. To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential to improve everyday functioning, lower extremity strength, functional mobility, balance self-efficacy, mood, caregiver mood, and perceived health status, of an 8-week, group, virtual, task-oriented community exercise program called TIME™ at Home, among people with balance and mobility limitations.
  2. To describe the experiences of exercise participants, caregivers, healthcare partners, and program facilitators and coordinators with TIME™ at Home (using qualitative data collection and analyses).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3L 2C2
        • March of Dimes Canada (Halifax)
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1W8
        • March of Dimes Canada (Toronto)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Exercise Participants (Self-report):

  • Difficulty with balance and mobility;
  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Ability to walk a minimum of 10 metres (with walking aids if used) without assistance and supervision from another person;
  • Ability to stand up from and sit down onto a chair independently (without supervision);
  • Ability to maintain balance while exercising in standing (e.g., marching on the spot) holding onto the back of a chair or a sturdy countertop;
  • Ability to speak and read English to understand informed consent and follow instructions for study procedures;
  • Availability of reliable Internet access at home;
  • Availability of an electronic device (laptop computer, tablet, or smartphone) to view the online exercise classes;
  • Availability of an email address to receive and click on a Zoom link;
  • Access to an armchair or chair of standard height (43-45 cm, 17-18 inches seat height), for the Timed 'Up and Go' test (a performance-based test); and
  • Availability of a caregiver or study partner who can be with the exercise participant for 2 Zoom-based evaluations during which they will be asked a few questions related to their health and will do a test of leg strength and walking

Exclusion Criteria for Exercise Participants:

  • Current or planned involvement in another formal exercise or rehabilitation program for the duration of the study;
  • Conditions or symptoms preventing participation in exercise (e.g., unstable cardiovascular disease, significant back or joint pain);
  • Cognitive impairment, defined by score of <11/15 on 5-minute Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - telephone version;
  • Ability to stand on one leg for more than 10 seconds without using any support; and
  • Severe hearing or visual impairment, that would hinder participation and safety in the virtual exercise program, operationalized as follows:

    1. I'd like to ask you about your vision. If you were to watch a video with a therapist showing exercises during a Zoom call, would you have any difficulty seeing the therapist, wearing glasses or contact lenses if you use them? If Yes: exclude. If No: pass the screen.
    2. I'd like to ask you about your hearing. If you were to watch a video with a therapist showing exercises during a Zoom call, would you have any difficulty hearing the therapist? If Yes: exclude. If No: pass the screen.

Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

  • Assist the exercise participant to live independently at home by providing help with basic and/or instrumental activities of daily living (doing groceries, cleaning, managing finances, making meals, etc.) at least once a week; and
  • Able to speak and read English

Exclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

• Paid personal support workers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TIME™ at Home
TIME™ at Home is a licensed, pre-recorded video-based, group, community exercise program. One program will have a maximum of 10 participants registered. March of Dimes Canada will run two programs. A 1.5-hour session will be hosted by two facilitators using Zoom twice a week for 8 weeks, starting with the Level 1 video (beginner level). All participants will switch to the Level 2 video (advanced level) mid-program.

Components of each 1.5-hour session:

  1. Pre-class social time (15 min): Unstructured - introductions, safety, and technology troubleshoot, and social interactions if time allows
  2. Exercise video (1 hour pre-recorded): a) 10-minute seated warm up; b) 40-minute functional exercises in standing, with standardized progressions and variations. Exercises are selected from the original, in-person TIME™ program and are deemed safe to perform at home by rehabilitation experts; and c) 10-minute seated cool down
  3. Post-class social time (15 min): Structured and unstructured social interactions
  4. Facilitators: A live virtual facilitator assisted by a co-facilitator to stream video, provide verbal encouragement and technology support
  5. Healthcare partner e-visits: A registered healthcare professional will make 2-3 e-visits. They will observe the class and engage with participants during the post-class social time and debrief with facilitators.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome for exercise participants
Time Frame: 0 and 8 weeks
Self-report measure of everyday functioning, scoring range 0-40, higher scores are better.
0 and 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale for exercise participants
Time Frame: 0 and 8 weeks
Self-report measure of balance self-efficacy, scoring range 0-100, higher scores are better.
0 and 8 weeks
Change in EuroQuol Visual Analogue Scale for exercise participants
Time Frame: 0 and 8 weeks
Self-report measure of perceived health status, scoring range 0-100, higher scores are better
0 and 8 weeks
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale for caregiver
Time Frame: 0 week and 8 weeks
Scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
0 week and 8 weeks
Change in 30-second sit to stand test (30STS) for exercise participants
Time Frame: 0 and 8 weeks
A performance-based test which measures lower extremity strength and dynamic balance. It is measured by the number of times a person comes to a full standing position from a chair in 30 seconds.
0 and 8 weeks
Change in Timed Up and Go (TUG) test for exercise participants
Time Frame: 0 and 8 weeks
A performance-based test which measures functional mobility. The time taken to stand in seconds from a standard chair, walk 3 metres, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down is documented.
0 and 8 weeks
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale for exercise participants
Time Frame: 0 and 8 weeks
Scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
0 and 8 weeks
Feasibility outcome: acceptability of the facilitator
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
90% of the participants will report that the facilitator was encouraging
4 and 8 weeks
Feasibility outcome: acceptability of the social component
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
60% of the participants will report participating in the social time before and after the exercise video
4 and 8 weeks
Feasibility outcome: acceptability of the healthcare partner
Time Frame: 8 weeks
80% of the participants will report they found the healthcare partner e-visits useful
8 weeks
Feasibility outcome: acceptability of the Level 2 video
Time Frame: 8 weeks
80% of the participants will find the video easy to understand and follow
8 weeks
Feasibility: intervention fidelity
Time Frame: Week 5 and 8
Checklist completed by a member of the research team
Week 5 and 8
Feasibility: Healthcare partner feedback questionnaire
Time Frame: Week 2, 5 and 8
To describe the program experiences
Week 2, 5 and 8
Feasibility outcome: attendance
Time Frame: Each class, i.e. twice a week for eight weeks
70% of the participants will attend at least 75% of the classes (i.e., 12)
Each class, i.e. twice a week for eight weeks
Feasibility outcome: adverse events
Time Frame: 8 weeks
0% of the participants will report a serious adverse event, defined as an event that leads to death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or a persistent or significant disability or incapacity that lasts more than 48 hours and limits activities of daily living
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nancy Salbach, PhD, University of Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobility Limitation

Clinical Trials on TIME™ at Home

3
Subscribe