Michigan Men's Diabetes Project 2 (MenD 2)

August 5, 2026 updated by: Jaclynn Hawkins, University of Michigan
The Michigan Men's Diabetes Project 2 (MenD 2) is an 18-month pilot randomized clinical trial. We are looking to recruit 60 Black men with type 2 diabetes (need to have diagnosis for at least 6 months) that are over the age of 21. Interested participants need to be under the care of a physician for their diabetes, have access to reliable transportation for study activities, and be willing to participate in 4 health assessments where they will get their A1C, blood pressure, height, and weight measured and they will complete a survey. All participants will receive 10 hours of diabetes self-management education with a Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist. Participants randomized to the intervention arm will also be offered 6 months of monthly diabetes self-management support (DSMS) sessions with trained Peer Leaders who are also Black men with type 2 diabetes. After the 6 months of support, this group will transition into 6 months of ongoing support where they can continue DSMS and/or other diabetes related initiatives that are important to the group and chosen by the group. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, DSME and DSMS sessions will likely be held via Zoom, ongoing support sessions have potential to be in person. The 4 health assessments will take place at baseline, 3-months, 9-months, and 15-months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Black/African American males, age 21 years or older with diagnosis of T2D for six months, transportation to attend program activities, under the care of a physician for diabetes, and willing to attend group delivered sessions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We considered restricting eligibility to a higher-risk population of participants with A1c ≥ 8%. Preliminary data suggest that over 50% of the proposed study sample will have an A1c ≥ 8%. Focusing on all older Black men with T2D allows us to cast a wide net for secondary prevention and public health impact.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peer led diabetes self-management support (PLDSMS)
Participants in the PLDSMS arm will receive 10 hours of diabetes self-management education (DSME) with a certified diabetes care and education specialist. This group will then transition into monthly 90-minute diabetes self-management support (DSMS) with trained peer leaders for 6 months. After the DSMS sessions, the group will transition into 6 months of ongoing support and will be encouraged to continue DSMS through initiatives that are important to them.
While the effectiveness of peer-led interventions delivering diabetes-related education and support for short-term clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral improvements is well-established, older Black men in particular are less likely to participate and are at a higher risk of drop-out from these studies. This intervention aims to determine if using older Black men as peer leaders to other older Black men will improve retention rates for this population.
Participants will attend 10 hours of virtual group diabetes self-management education classes led by a certified diabetes care and education specialist through the online HIPPA compliant Zoom platform.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Participants in the control group will receive 10 hours of diabetes self-management education (DSME) with a certified diabetes care and education specialist.
Participants will attend 10 hours of virtual group diabetes self-management education classes led by a certified diabetes care and education specialist through the online HIPPA compliant Zoom platform.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Anthropometric data/clinical data - Change in HbA1c. HbA1c was measured using the DCA 2000 point-of-care testing instrument. A longitudinal mixed-effects linear regression model was used to examine changes in primary and secondary outcomes over time between the intervention (PLDSMS) and control (EUC) groups. The reference/comparison group was the PLDSMS group.
baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Change in Diabetes Self-Management
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Psychosocial survey data collection (self-reported). Diabetes self-management was measured using the 8-item Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS), with summed scores ranging from 8 to 40 and higher scores representing greater self-effectiveness. A longitudinal mixed-effects linear regression model was used to examine changes in primary and secondary outcomes over time between the intervention (PLDSMS) and control (EUC) groups. The reference/comparison group was the PLDSMS group.
baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in BMI
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Weight relative to height. A longitudinal mixed-effects linear regression model was used to examine changes in primary and secondary outcomes over time between the intervention (PLDSMS) and control (EUC) groups. The reference/comparison group was the PLDSMS group.
baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Change in Depression
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months

Psychosocial survey data collection (self-reported). Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

o Sum Scores: The total score categorizes depression severity:

  • 0-4: Minimal or none
  • 5-9: Mild
  • 10-14: Moderate
  • 15-19: Moderately severe
  • 20-27: Severe

A longitudinal mixed-effects linear regression model was used to examine changes in primary and secondary outcomes over time between the intervention (PLDSMS) and control (EUC) groups. The reference/comparison group was the PLDSMS group.

baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic)
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Anthropometric data/clinical data - Change in Blood Pressure (systolic - mmHg). Blood pressure was measured using an automated machine that obtained three readings with 1 min between each reading. The readings were averaged and recorded. A longitudinal mixed-effects linear regression model was used to examine changes in primary and secondary outcomes over time between the intervention (PLDSMS) and control (EUC) groups. The reference/comparison group was the PLDSMS group.
baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Change in Blood Pressure (Diastolic)
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Anthropometric data/clinical data - Change in Blood Pressure (diastolic - mmHg). Blood pressure was measured using an automated machine that obtained three readings with 1 min between each reading. The readings were averaged and recorded. A longitudinal mixed-effects linear regression model was used to examine changes in primary and secondary outcomes over time between the intervention (PLDSMS) and control (EUC) groups. The reference/comparison group was the PLDSMS group.
baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Change in Diabetes Social Support
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
To measure perceived social support, the 8-item Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire) was used. Responses are measured on a Likert scale from 1 ("Much less than I would like") to 5 ("As much as I would like"). The higher the score, the higher the level of perceived support. In the current study, response options ranged from 1 ("Much less than I would like") to 6 ("As much as I would like") across all eight items. Responses to the eight items were summed to produce a total score ranging from 8 to 48. Higher total scores indicate greater perceived social support.
baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Change in Diabetes-Related Distress (Core)
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
To measure diabetes distress (emotional distress as a result of living with type 2 diabetes), the Type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS) was used. The Core Distress Score is the average of all eight items of the scale and is measured on a 1 to 5 Likert scale ("Not a Problem = 1" to "A Very Serious Problem = 5"). Higher scores indicate higher levels of distress. A mean score of <2.0 indicates little or no distress. A mean score ≥2.0 but not more than 2.9 indicates moderate distress. A mean score ≥3.0 indicates high distress. Any score >2.0 is considered clinically significant.
baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
Change in Conformity to Masculine Norms
Time Frame: baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months
The Short Form of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory (CMNI-30) was used to assess conformity to traditional masculine norms. Participants rated the extent to which they agreed with 30 behavioral statements. Each item was scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses to all 30 items were summed to calculate a total score ranging from 0 to 150. Higher total scores indicate stronger adherence to traditional masculine norms.
baseline, 3-months, 9-months, 15-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jaclynn Hawkins, PhD, University of Michigan, School of Social Work

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00200469
  • 1R21DK117339-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe