- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05388084
Peer Led Outreach to Engage Male Partners of Pregnant Women in Uganda (Okutuuka Study) (Okutuuka)
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Overall design
This is a randomized trial of pregnant women and their male partners. The overall goal is to evaluate the impact of innovative strategies to increase male partner HIV testing and engagement in HIV care and prevention through ANC services provided to pregnant women. The intervention consists of a phone call from a trained peer father to encourage male partners of pregnant women to test for HIV. Men will first be encouraged to come to the clinic for HIV testing and counseling. Those who are not willing/able to attend the clinic will be offered the option of meeting a male counselor to receive HIV testing in a convenient location in the community. The study team will recruit pregnant women to be randomized to: 1) the intervention arm (peer father phone call) or 2) the delayed intervention arm, standard of care standard of care invitation letter to provide to their partner for fast-track HIV testing and male peer father phone calls after a 3 month delay. Women in both arms will receive an HIVST kit from the ANC clinic per standard of care guidelines. In the delayed intervention arm, men who have not HIV tested after 3 months of female partner enrollment will receive the intervention of a peer father phone call. This is being done for ethical reasons since preliminary data show phone calls from men may be effective in increasing men's HIV testing. All study outcomes will be collected by 3 months post female partner enrollment so providing the delayed intervention will not impact the study team's ability to measure the study's effectiveness. The study team will recommend that all HIV-positive participants initiate ART, and all HIV-negative participants who are eligible, initiate PrEP.
Objectives
Aim 1: To assess whether a male peer-delivered, status-neutral outreach to male partners of pregnant women increases the proportion of partners who test compared to the standard of care (invitation letters for fast-track testing and HIVST delivered by the pregnant woman).
Rationale: Innovations are needed to address the challenges associated with reaching male partners of pregnant women with HIV testing and linkage to ART or PrEP depending on their HIV serostatus.
Hypothesis: A male peer delivered, status-neutral approach to male partner engagement may overcome male partners reluctance to be tested for HIV and women's reluctance to approach their male partners about HIV testing. Approach: The investigators will randomize women 1:1 to the intervention or delayed arm and determine the proportion of male partners who test for HIV within 1 month after the female partner is randomized. The outcome will male partner testing based on male HIV testing in the two arms.
Aim 2: To determine the proportion of male partners who test HIV-negative and have an indication for PrEP who initiate PrEP and the proportion of partners who test HIV-positive who initiate ART compared to the SOC arm.
Rationale: Men who are HIV-negative are a priority for PrEP if they have a known HIV-positive partner or multiple partners, including during late pregnancy and postpartum when men are more likely to have sex with outside partners.
Hypothesis: Trained male peers will be effective in addressing men's reluctance to link to ART or PrEP and facilitating linkage to care or prevention.
Approach: Men who test for HIV through either arm will be referred for ART (if HIV-positive) or PrEP (if HIV-negative and reports multiple partners or an HIV positive partner) through the trained male peer counselor in the intervention arm or health care provider in the SOC arm. The research team will evaluate linkage to PrEP or ART among men who test for HIV, by arm.
Aim 3: To qualitatively assess acceptability of peer-delivered, status-neutral outreach to promote HIV testing among male partners of pregnant women.
Rationale: Assessment of acceptability is a key component of evaluating any novel intervention. The research team will use qualitative methods to investigate acceptability and preferences for HIV testing services among male partners of pregnant women in the cohort.
Hypothesis: A peer delivered, status-neutral approach to male partner engagement will be acceptable to recipients.
Approach: The research team will conduct individual qualitative interviews with a randomly selected subsample of 20 male partners who received peer-delivered outreach to evaluate intervention acceptability.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kampala, Uganda
- Infectious Disease Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- -Age ≥18 years or if 14-17 years, qualified as emancipated minors (individuals below the age of majority who are pregnant)
- Currently pregnant
- Not currently enrolled in an HIV treatment study
- Male partner not known to be HIV-positive or has not tested in the past 3 months
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
- Able and willing to provide adequate locator information for study retention purposes
- At low risk of intimate partner violence
For men
- Has a female partner enrolled in the Okutuuka study
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- not meeting all of the above inclusion criteria
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Male peer led intervention
Male partners of women randomized to the intervention arm will receive a phone call from the male peer to encourage them to test for HIV at the clinic.
Male peer fathers will offer to meet men at the clinic and guide them through the process of HIV testing.
Men who are not willing/able to attend the clinic for HIV testing will be offered testing in a private and confidential location in the community; the peer male counselor meet men and offer to assist them through the process of using and interpreting an oral HIVST.
Men who are not interested in testing with the peer father will be offered the HIVST kit to take home.
Peer fathers will obtain men's consent to participate in the study.
|
Male partners of women randomized to the intervention arm will receive a phone call from the male peer to encourage them to test for HIV at the clinic.
Male peer fathers will offer to meet men at the clinic and guide them through the process of HIV testing.
Men who are not willing/able to attend the clinic for HIV testing will be offered testing in a private and confidential location in the community; the peer male counselor meet men and offer to assist them through the process of using and interpreting an oral HIVST.
Men who are not interested in testing with the peer father will be offered the HIVST kit to take home.
Peer fathers will obtain men's consent to participate in the study.
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard of care and delayed intervention
Standard of care standard of care invitation letter to provide to their partner for fast-track HIV testing and male peer father phone calls after a 3 month delay.
|
Females receive standard of care invitation letter to provide to their partner for fast-track HIV testing and male peer father phone calls after a 3 month delay.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Male partner HIV testing
Time Frame: 3 months from female partner enrollment
|
The outcome for Aim 1 is the proportion of men who test for HIV in the intervention arm compared to those who test in the control arm. Endpoint: Site verified HIV test in a male partner of an enrolled women within three months of the women's enrollment |
3 months from female partner enrollment
|
|
Linkage to PrEP
Time Frame: 3 months from female partner
|
The outcome for Aim 2 is the proportion of male partners who test HIV-negative and have an indication for PrEP who initiate PrEP compared to the SOC arm.
|
3 months from female partner
|
|
Linkage to ART
Time Frame: 3 months from female partner
|
The outcome for Aim 3 is the proportion of male partners who test HIV-positive and initiate ART compared to the SOC arm.
|
3 months from female partner
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Connie Celum, MD, MPH, University of Washington
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00014963
- 1K01MH115789-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- 1R01MH113434-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Engagement, Patient
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTerminated
-
University of AarhusUnknownPatient Engagement | Patient Empowerment | Patient Compliance
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Mental Health America; TalkspaceCompleted
-
Inonu UniversityCompleted
-
The Cleveland ClinicActive, not recruitingPatient EngagementUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompleted
-
NYU Langone HealthCompleted
-
Medical College of WisconsinCompletedCommunication | Patient EngagementUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Massachusetts,... and other collaboratorsCompletedPatient Engagement | Physician-Patient Relations | Physician's Role | Patient ActivationUnited States
-
Palo Alto Medical FoundationUniversity of Rochester; Dartmouth College; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; ... and other collaboratorsCompletedPatient Engagement | Physician's Role | Physician-Patient Relationship
Clinical Trials on Male peer engagement
-
Boston UniversityWorld Education, Inc.Completed
-
Boston UniversityThe Brooklyn Hospital Center; Justice Resource Institute; Puerto Rico Community... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GAPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteUnknownSpinal Cord Injury | Peer Group
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationCanadian International Development AgencyCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedStress | Burnout | Stress, Psychological | Stress, Emotional | Maternal Health | Mental Health | Quality of Care | Discrimination, Social | Adverse Outcomes | Healthcare ProviderKenya
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
Joseph KB MatovuMakerere University; RANDCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedHIV Infections | Stigma, SocialUnited States
-
Duke UniversityDuke Clinical Research InstituteCompletedHeart FailureUnited States