A Patient-centered Approach to Successful Community Transition After Catastrophic Injury

April 18, 2016 updated by: Michael Jones, Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA

Shepherd Center is bringing a more patient-centered focus to educational, peer-support, and technology resources offered to patients with spinal cord injury and their families and is evaluating these changes.

Approximately 740 patients have provided information about healthcare utilization following inpatient rehabilitation. This information will help Shepherd Center staff follow utilization trends and plan programs targeted at the high-use areas.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Research efforts are transforming the educational, peer-support and technology resources offered to patients and their caregivers, and evaluating how these changes help improve outcomes, including building patients' sense of self-efficacy - the belief that they can effectively manage their own care. Goals of the three focus areas include:

A. Patient and Family Education Revamp patient education modules for bladder management, skin management, and medical complications management to follow the chronic disease self management approach that replaces didactic lectures with participant-focused problem solving discussions led by peers (persons with SCI). Multiple baseline implementation approaches will be evaluated in interrupted time series analyses.

B. Peer mentoring and peer-led self-management training The peer mentor randomized clinical trial is reported separately on clinicaltrials.gov and not repeated here.

C. Patient and family web portal Shepherd Center, along with our collaborators at Craig Hospital in Denver, Colorado, are developing an engagement portal to provide a mechanism for patients to manage all aspects of injury following rehabilitation discharge and share information with other providers and caregivers.The portal will become a standard part of rehabilitation care and discharge planning for all Shepherd Center patients - starting first with patients with spinal cord injuries and later expanding to others. Stakeholders will be actively involved in providing feedback about portal usability and content so that the product continues to meet their needs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient receiving inpatient rehabilitation at Shepherd Center following spinal cord injury
  • discharge to community setting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • discharge to non-community setting
  • patient without spinal cord injury at Shepherd Center

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Peer directed education
A revised education approach that focuses on problem solving discussions delivered by peers and grounded clinical information is compared to traditional approach of didactic clinician-driven education lectures
No drug or device is included. The intervention of interest is the redesigned approach to inpatient education that follows the Stanford chronic disease self management approach which includes peer-led problem solving discussions compared to traditional didactic education lectures provided by nurse educators
Other: Patient Engagement Portal
A patient-owned portal to manage injury information is maintained in real-time by patients and families and shared with other care providers after inpatient rehabilitation discharge.
No drug or device interventions. The Engagement Portal is populated by electronic medication record information (demographics, medications, supplies) then owned/maintained by patient after discharge. This approach to managing information and conditions associated with injury will be compared to the traditional approach of providing patients with a large instruction manual to carry home with them.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rehospitalization
Time Frame: 30 days post rehabilitation discharge
patient report on telephone interview
30 days post rehabilitation discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rehospitalization
Time Frame: 90 days post rehabilitation discharge
patient report on telephone interview
90 days post rehabilitation discharge

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
Time Frame: 180 days post rehabilitation discharge
Data aggregated per scoring rules of validated measure. patient report on telephone interview
180 days post rehabilitation discharge
Societal participation as measured by CHART (Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique)- questionnaire
Time Frame: 180 days post rehabilitation discharge
Data aggregated per scoring rules of validated measure. patient report on telephone interview
180 days post rehabilitation discharge
Satisfaction with Life Scale
Time Frame: 180 days post rehabilitation discharge
patient report on telephone interview
180 days post rehabilitation discharge
Healthcare utilization - rehospitalization, emergency room visits, urgent care visits
Time Frame: 180 day post rehabilitation discharge
per patient report on telephone interview
180 day post rehabilitation discharge
Press Gainey patient satisfaction with care - interview
Time Frame: 30 days post rehabilitation discharge
Data aggregated per scoring rules of validated measure
30 days post rehabilitation discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Julie Gassaway, Dir Health and Wellness

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Peer directed education

Subscribe