InGReS: Intra-treatment Image Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy Dose-escalation Study (InGReS)

September 12, 2023 updated by: Teresa Guerrero Urbano, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

InGReS is a phase I pilot study of adaptive dose-escalated radiotherapy in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

InGReS will assess the feasibility of adapting the radiotherapy (RT) plan for each patient, based on anatomical and metabolic changes in the tumour seen on MRI and FDG-PET-CT performed after 2 weeks of CRT in a multicentre setting. The overall aim of the trial is to determine the safety and feasibility of delivering dose-escalated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) to the residual primary tumour, as seen on intra-treatment imaging, in the final 3 weeks of RT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will recruit 15 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who are suitable for primary treatment with concurrent chemo-radiation. The main aim is to see whether it is feasible to perform a FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan after 2 weeks of radiotherapy and re-plan the radiotherapy to escalate the dose of radiotherapy delivered to the residual primary tumour as seen on PET-CT and MRI.

Patients will commence with standard chemo-radiotherapy; 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions with concomitant platinum chemotherapy. After 2 weeks of chemo-radiotherapy patients will have an intra-treatment FDG-PET-CT and MRI scan to assess early response to treatment. Patients with evidence of residual disease will proceed with the dose-escalation phase of the study, with an adaptive radiotherapy re-plan and dose-escalation to the residual primary tumour.

The study will establish acute and late radiotherapy toxicity rates in patients who receive dose-escalated RT, particularly the effect of treatment on long-term swallowing function. The study hypothesis is that mucosal toxicity rates for dose-escalated treatment will be equivalent to those for standard CRT, according to published data. Furthermore, it will also explore whether changes in FDG-PET-CT and MRI during treatment correlate with patient outcomes and potential blood-based biomarkers of treatment response. Local control, disease-free and overall survival will be assessed for both standard and dose-escalated approaches.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Locally advanced, histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx and hypopharynx to be treated with primary radical chemo-radiotherapy:

    1. Hypopharyngeal cancer - HPV negative OR HPV positive
    2. Oropharyngeal cancer - EITHER HPV negative OR HPV positive with N stage at least N2b and greater than 10 pack year smoking history: All HPV positive oropharyngeal patients should have at least stage III disease (TNM8)
  2. ≥T2 tumours:
  3. Staging MRI showing minimum diameter of primary tumour greater than or equal to 1cm
  4. Staging 18F-FDG-PET/CT showing adequate uptake in the primary tumour, defined as SUVmax of ≥ 5.0
  5. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) decision to treat with primary CRT with curative intent
  6. Patients fit for radical treatment with primary CRT
  7. WHO Performance Status 0-1

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck region interfering with the protocol treatment plan
  2. Patients requiring neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
  3. Inability to tolerate PET or MRI; general contra-indications to MRI
  4. Contra-indication to gadolinium
  5. Baseline SUVmax < 5.0 in the primary tumour on PET-CT or smaller than 1cm in axial dimensions on cross sectional imaging
  6. GFR <40ml/min
  7. Previous primary malignancy within 2 years (excluding adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, low risk Prostate cancer Gleason 6 or below, carcinoma in situ of cervix).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HNSCC receiving (chemo)radiotherapy
Radiation: Intra-treatment FDG-PET-CT and MRI will be used to identify tumours and patients for dose-escalation. Patients identified for dose-escalation (boost) will undergo adaptive radiotherapy replanning, with the primary tumour (GTVp) receiving 76.9Gy in 35 fractions.
FDG-PET-CT and MRI scan will be used during radiotherapy to assess early treatment response and identify tumours eligible for dose-escalation.
Tumours eligible for dose-escalation (boost), as seen on intra-treatment FDG-PET-CT and MRI scan, will receive 76.9 Gy to the residual gross primary tumour. The radiotherapy plan will be replanned to incorporate the simultaneous-integrated-boost to the GTVp which will be delivered over the last 3 weeks of treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the safety of delivering an additional 10% dose (biological rather than numerical) of radiotherapy to the residual primary tumour during radiotherapy
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of grade 3 or above late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) mucosal toxicity or feeding tube retention rate following completion of treatment. An excess rate of >14% would be regarded as unacceptable.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of grade 4 acute mucosal toxicity (NCI CTCAE)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Toxicity grading, using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale v.5.0, will be presented during and up to 12 weeks after treatment. Grading scale: 0-5, with the higher score meaning a worse outcome.
12 weeks
Incidence of grade 3 or above late non-mucosal toxicity (NCI CTCAE)
Time Frame: 12 months
Toxicity of non-mucosal late toxicity will be graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale v.5.0. Scores will be presented at 13 weeks; 6 and 12 months after treatment. Grading scale: 0-5, with the higher score meaning a worse outcome.
12 months
Incidence of grade 3 or above late non-mucosal toxicity (RTOG/EORTC)
Time Frame: 12 months
Toxicity of non-mucosal late toxicity will be graded using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) late toxicity scoring. Scores will be presented at 13 weeks; 6 and 12 months after treatment. Grading scale: 0-5, with the higher score meaning a worse outcome.
12 months
Incidence of grade 3 or above late non-mucosal toxicity (LENT/SOMA criteria)
Time Frame: 12 months
Toxicity of non-mucosal late toxicity will be graded using the modified Late Effects on Normal Tissues- Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENTSOMA) scoring systems. Scores will be presented at 13 weeks; 6 and 12 months after treatment. Grading scale: 0-4, with the higher score meaning a worse outcome.
12 months
To assess swallowing panel measurements including qualitative swallowing assessments (MDADI)
Time Frame: 12 months
M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores will be plotted over time. Scores will be presented at baseline and weeks 3 & 7 of CRT. Then at 13 weeks; 6 and 12 months after treatment. A higher MDADI score represents better function and quality of life.
12 months
To assess patient reported outcomes measures and quality of life questionnaires (UW-QOL v 4.1)
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient reported outcomes measures and quality of life scores using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) v4.1 will be plotted over time. Scores will be presented at baseline and weeks 3 & 7 of CRT. Then at 13 weeks; 6 and 12 months after treatment. A higher score represents better function and quality of life.
12 months
To assess patient reported outcomes measures and quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N43)
Time Frame: 12 months

Patient reported outcomes measures and quality of life scores, using the questionnaires of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Modules 30 and 43 (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N43), will be plotted over time. Scores will be presented at baseline and weeks 3 & 7 of CRT. Then at 13 weeks; 6 and 12 months after treatment.

For the functioning and the quality of life scales, a higher score indicates better health. For the symptoms scales, a higher score indicates a higher level of symptom burden.

12 months
To assess results of quantitative swallowing assessments (Videofluoroscopy)
Time Frame: 12 months
Video-fluoroscopy test scores, particularly the Rosenbek Penetration/Aspiration Scale (PAS) and the summary Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scores, will be presented at 12 months after treatment. For both PAS and summary DIGEST scores, a higher score indicates worse function.
12 months
To assess late toxicity rates and the effect of treatment on swallowing function (100ml water swallow)
Time Frame: 12 months
100ml water swallow test results will be presented at baseline. Then at 6 weeks, 13 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after treatment. Patients will be reported as having failed the test if they coughed or had a wet voice quality post swallow or were unable to finish the task.
12 months
To assess tumour response to adaptive radiotherapy dose-escalation (FDG-PET-CT)
Time Frame: 3 months
Complete metabolic response rate on PET-CT scan will be reported at 3 months after treatment
3 months
The loco-regional tumour control
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of local or regional tumour recurrence rates will be presented.
12 months
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 12 months
Disease-free survival rates (Kaplan-Meier estimates) will be presented at 3 and 12 months after completion of CRT.
12 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: 12 months
Overall survival rates (Kaplan-Meier estimates) will be presented at 3 and 12 months after completion of CRT.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Teresa Guerrero Urbano, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 16, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 16, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 22/LO/0056
  • 257601 (Other Identifier: IRAS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trials on Imaging: Intra-treatment FDG-PET-CT and MRI

Subscribe