Bipolar Efficacy Biomarkers for rTMS

February 29, 2024 updated by: Itay Hadas, University of California, San Diego

Bipolar Efficacy Biomarkers for Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst rTMS Trial

The research study is being conducted to test whether using high dose spaced theta-burst rTMS (a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) produces a significant reduction in depressive symptoms compared with sham. This project will recruit patients aged 18-70 with symptoms of bipolar depression (BPD) who have failed (or not shown signs of improvement) after at least two prior treatments. The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in reductions in depressive symptoms by the end of a five-day treatment period. The alternative hypothesis is that, compared with sham, active TMS will result in a greater reduction in depressive symptoms by the end of the treatment period.

To facilitate the development of rTMS protocols there is a need for biomarkers that are sensitive to BPD symptom severity and clinical improvement. Previously in our lab, investigators developed biomarkers suitable for depression trials, and these biomarkers are very likely to show sensitivity to BPD, since they are associated with brain regions and functions associated with BPD. As a secondary aim, the investigators will try to identify biomarkers in cortical region associated with BPD, and formulate a statistical model that may be able to predict BPD remission after the treatment. this study will lead to development of new brain stimulation treatment protocols and biomarkers, will aid in treatment selection, and eventually lead to better clinical outcome for patients suffering from BPD.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92127
        • UCSD Interventional Psychiatry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bipolar depression (BP I and BP II) by DSM 5 criteria (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2013)
  • Age 18-70
  • Right or left handed
  • All genders
  • Treatment resistant depression, as in they must have treatment resistant depression with 2 or more prior antidepressant trials that have failed to produce a response (> 50% reduction in symptoms) using ATHF criteria (Sackeim et al., 2019)
  • Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
  • Must be on a stable medication regimen, requiring at least one mood stabilizer
  • Depression severity as represented by scoring at least 20 on MADRS
  • Meet the safety criteria as defined in the transcranial magnetic stimulation adult safety screen (TASS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No current substance abuse disorder for the past 6 months (previous substance abuse not exclusionary)
  • Any psychotic disorder or current active psychotic symptoms (personality disorders not exclusionary unless in the opinion of the referring psychiatrist it would jeopardize participation)
  • No dementia or other major neurological disorders
  • Not having depression as primary disorder
  • No major medical illness, for example metastatic cancer, end stage renal disease
  • Not able to verify contact information. Participants must be able to follow through with the study & must have verified contact information and at least one verified contact
  • Pregnancy. While there are no known risks to a fetus this is a new use of TMS, which has not been tested, thus pregnancy is exclusionary
  • Score on YMRS greater than 12 (patients with mixed features have been shown not to respond well to TMS treatment (Tavares et al., 2021).
  • Rapid cycling Bipolar illness (patients with > 4 mood episodes within the past year will be excluded, as they have a higher risk of switch to mania (Tondo et al., 2010)
  • Any implants, conditions, or contraindications that would be deemed unsafe for TMS or MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active iTBS
Patients will receive unilateral accelerated theta-burst stimulation to the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex for 5 consecutive days, with a total of 10 hours a day. Treatment will be 10min with 50min of breaks in between the 10 sessions.
Cool B65- A/P - active side magnetic coil stimulation applied to the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex.
Placebo Comparator: Sham iTBS
Patients will receive sham unilateral accelerated theta-burst stimulation to the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex for 5 consecutive days, with a total of 10 hours a day. Treatment will be 10min with 50min of breaks in between the 10 sessions.
Cool-B65 A/P - sham side magnetic coil stimulation applied to the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scores
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessment of the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aiTBS for depressive symptoms in BPD by analysis of scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) obtained at baseline, post-treatment, and throughout the course of treatment, and comparing them between active vs. sham TMS treatment groups. Scores on the MADRS range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
6 months
Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) Scores
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessment of the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aiTBS for depressive symptoms in BPD by analysis of scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) obtained at baseline, post-treatment, and throughout the course of treatment, and comparing them between active vs. sham TMS treatment groups. Scores on the MADRS range from 0 to 53, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
6 months
Assessment of Biomarkers
Time Frame: 6 months
Analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation concurrent with electroencephalogram (TMS-EEG) to extract effective connectivity metrics between the subgenual cingulate (SGC) and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) as BPD biomarkers, as measured by scores on the HAMD and MADRS, for aiTBS compared to sham treatment.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 800601

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder

Clinical Trials on Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation

Subscribe