Comparing Pregabalin and Placebo in Patients With Persistent Globus Sensation (Lyrica)

June 30, 2022 updated by: Prof Dr Jan Tack, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Pregabalin and Placebo in Patients With Persistent Globus Sensation

To evaluate the relative merits, safety and effectiveness of pregabalin in globus patients compared with placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Globus, defined as a feeling of a lump in the throat, unexplained by structural lesions, GERD, or histopathology-based esophageal motility disorders, is a frequently occurring symptom of unknown etiology. Today there is no appropriate treatment for patients with a globus sensation. Pathophysiological mechanisms that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of globus include gastroesophageal reflux disease, oesophageal motor disorders, overactive cricopharyngeal muscle, psychological factors, gastric islet patches in the proximal esophagus and deformations of the cervical spine. However, none of these convincingly explains the clinical picture in globus patients.

Investigators recently observed that a large majority (80%) of patients with persistent globus sensation have a pathological EMG examination of the larynx, indicative of neuropathy in the laryngeal area. The investigators believe that this neuropathy may explain some of the symptoms that are experienced by patients with globus, and may actually contribute to some observations of unclear pathophysiological relevance such as a hyperreactive ciricopharyngeal muscle. Neuropathies may respond to specific therapies, such as the pregabalin.

The aim of the study is to evaluate if treatment with pregabalin (Lyrica®) is effective in these patients. The effect of gabapentin, another anti-epileptic drug with therapeutic efficacy in neuropathy, was evaluated in patients with chronic cough as sign of laryngeal sensory neuropathy. In this study 68% of the patients experienced improvement, with an even higher efficacy in the group of patients with a pathological EMG (80%).

In order to better understand the underlying pathophysiology, and how this responds to therapy, the investigators will also evaluate upper esophageal sphincter high resolution manometric properties during the study. An elevated resting pressure in the upper sphincter was already reported in previous studie, but not confirmed in a more recent study, which did report a hyperreactive UES, mainly characterized by a hyperdynamic respiratory pressure change.

Esophageal inlet patches have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of globus, although the exact mechanism remains unclear. In the present study, all patients will undergo a strict evaluation of the upper part of the esophagus during endoscopy, to document presence or absence of inlet patches.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Globus symptoms for more than three months
  • First symptoms > 6 months ago
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gabapentin/pregabalin treatment
  • Unstable neuroleptic or antidepressive treatment (stable dose during min 8 weeks)
  • Symptom relief under PPI treatment (min 8 weeks full dose)
  • Patients with persisting esophagitis of Los Angeles grade B or higher under PPI on upper GI endoscopy
  • Primary esophageal motility disorder (achalasia, scleroderma, dermatomyositis, …)
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
  • Candida esophagitis
  • Mechanical explanation of symptoms (e.g. stricture in the pharyngo-esophageal region)
  • Pregnancy or plans for pregnancy in the next 12 months (in females)
  • History of previous resective gastric or esophageal surgery, cervical spine fusion, Zenker's diverticulum, esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Pregabalin
Treatment with pregabalin in the treatment of globus sensation
Patients receive for one week Pregabalin 75 mg and 7 weeks Pregabalin 150 mg
Other Names:
  • Lyrica
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Treatment with placebo in the treatment of globus sensation
Patients receive a treatment with placebo for 8 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical remission
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Proportion of patients in clinical remission or improvement after 8 weeks defined by the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale question 12 ("At present, how annoying do you find your throat sensation?") Ranging from 0-7, where 7 is a worse outcome. Clinical remission is defined as scoring a 0 or 1 on this question.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GETS overall scores
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Improvement of Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS) overall scores compared between both groups will be evaluated after 8 weeks. The total GETS score is 70, the higher the score, much worse are the symptoms.
8 weeks
Clinical remission
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Proportion of patients in clinical remission or improvement after 4 weeks defined by the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale question 12 ("At present, how annoying do you find your throat sensation?") Ranging from 0-7, where 7 is a worse outcome. Clinical remission is defined as scoring a 0 or 1 on this question.
4 weeks
GETS overall scores
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Improvement of Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale overall scores compared between both groups will be evaluated after 4 weeks. The total GETS score is 70, the higher the score, much worse are the symptoms.
4 weeks
Overall Treatment Efficacy
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Overall Treatment Efficacy evaluation will be analysed by considering the score at 8 weeks. Ranging from 0-6, where 6 is a lower treatment efficacy.
8 weeks
Weekly GETS overall scores
Time Frame: week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7 and week 8
Improvement of Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale overall scores compared between both groups evaluated for each week during the treatment period. Ranging from 0-7, where 7 is a worse outcome. Clinical remission is defined as scoring a 0 or 1 on this question.
week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7 and week 8

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlations
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The correlation between Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale scores, Patient Health Questionnaires scores and therapeutic response evaluated at 8 weeks.
8 weeks
Correlation questionnaires and neuropathy
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The correlation between Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale scores, Patient Health Questionnaires scores and neuropathy will be evaluated at 8 weeks. The higher score on the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire, the worse the patients are feeling: more depressed and more anxious and more somatic complaints.
8 weeks
The impact on upper esophageal manometry.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The impact of active or placebo treatment on manometry at 8 weeks. Specific upper esophageal manometry parameters are not yet defined.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Globus Sensation

Clinical Trials on Pregabalin

Subscribe