Evaluation of the Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility/Usability of a Metastatic Breast-cancer Specific Prognostic Calculator Among Clinicians

September 22, 2025 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
I this qualitative study, Investigators will conduct semi-structured interviews with clinicians that are involved in the care of patients with breast cancer to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility/usability of a metastatic breast cancer-specific prognostic tool. These interviews will be conducted by the UNC CHAI Core and will continue until thematic saturation (estimated 10 participants). The investigators will code the qualitative data using emerging themes, guided by a well-established implementation science theory, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The information gained from these studies will inform an implementation approach to increase the usability and acceptability of a novel prognostic tool to assist oncologists in the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

If this study is successful, Investigators will implement an MBC-specific prognostic tool to help clinicians identify patients who are at high risk of death in the next 30 days. Based on the input from clinicians in this proposal, as well as additional qualitative studies with patients and families, Investigators will design an implementation protocol to inform how to use this tool in clinical practice. Rather than simply publishing a prognostic tool that may not be adopted into practice, this project aims to ensure successful implementation of an evidence-based tool into the routine care of patients with MBC. Doing so will serve as an important step towards identifying high-risk patients and connecting ort to ensure high-quality, patient-centered end-of-life care.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Clinician participants will include physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurse navigators. Participants will be recruited from the UNC Medical Center breast oncology group as well as other practices identified by the Principal Investigator based on existing professional networks (referring physicians, other UNC oncology entities, collaborative groups).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Verbal informed consent obtained to participate in the study.
  2. Subject is willing and able to comply with study procedures based on the judgement of the investigator or protocol designee.
  3. Physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or nurse navigator
  4. At least 6 months of experience in the clinical care of patients with metastatic breast cancer in the United States.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English Speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Clinicans
Participants will include: physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurse navigators. Participants will be recruited from the UNC Medical Center breast oncology group as well as other practices identified by the Principal Investigator based on existing professional networks (referring physicians, other UNC oncology entities, collaborative groups).
Interviews will be conducted by experienced qualitative researchers from the UNC Connected Health for Applications & Interventions (CHAI) Core. The interview will be conducted over the phone or secure videoconferencing. The interview will be conducted in a semi-structured fashion using an interview guide. However, because the purpose of this semi-structured qualitative interview study is to determine which themes participants identify as important, the exact content of each interview will differ, and the interview guide will be modified as additional interviews are conducted. Interviews will be audio recorded with concurrent notetaking by the interviewer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Key barriers for use a metastatic breast cancer-specific prognostic tool
Time Frame: 12 months
Study Investigators have developed a metastatic breast cancer (MBC)-specific prognostic calculator using the ASCO CancerLinQ Discovery database to help oncologists better estimate prognosis in MBC patients. Key barriers using this metastatic breast cancer-specific prognostic tool will be identified, through semi-structured qualitative interviews with oncology clinicians.
12 months
Key facilitators for use of a metastatic breast cancer-specific prognostic tool
Time Frame: 12 months
Study Investigators have developed a metastatic breast cancer (MBC)-specific prognostic calculator using the ASCO CancerLinQ Discovery database to help oncologists better estimate prognosis in MBC patients. Key facilitators using this metastatic breast cancer-specific prognostic tool will be identified, through semi-structured qualitative interviews with oncology clinicians.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Key barriers for discussion of prognosis between oncology clinicians and patients with metastatic breast cancer
Time Frame: 12 months
Key barriers for discussion of prognosis between oncology clinicians and patients with metastatic breast cancer will be identified, through semi-structured qualitative interviews with oncology clinicians.
12 months
Key facilitators for discussion of prognosis between oncology clinicians and patients with metastatic breast cancer
Time Frame: 12 months
Key facilitators for discussion of prognosis between oncology clinicians and patients with metastatic breast cancer will be identified, through semi-structured qualitative interviews with oncology clinicians.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emily Ray, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 10, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 10, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Clinician Qualitative Interview

Subscribe