Added Value of a Small Camera (Iriscope) in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Nodules and Masses

February 16, 2024 updated by: Olivier Taton, Erasme University Hospital

Since the beginning of lung screening program in the different countries around the world by chest CT scan, numerous lung nodules and masses of unknown etiology are diagnosed.

Usually, the pathological diagnosis is obtained by bronchoscopy. However, peripheral bronchi cannot be seen after the fifth bronchial division as the diameter of the broncoscope is greated than the diameter of the bronchi. Therefore, the Iriscope was developed. It consists in a thin catheter with a mini-camera at its distal extremity.

The aime of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy guided by Iriscope in the setting of peripheral lung nodules and masses supect of malignancy, to compare the Iriscope to endobronchial radial ultrasonography (which is a validated technique to guide bronchoscopy in the setting of peripheral lung nodules and masses) and to evaluate the added value on the diagnostic yield by combining these 2 techniques.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lung nodules or masses suspect of malignancy with a diameter between 2 and 5 centimeters

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to general anesthesia
  • Coagulopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Iriscope
The use of Iriscope to improve the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in the setting of peripheral lung nodules
Active Comparator: EBUS
The use of Iriscope to improve the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in the setting of peripheral lung nodules
Experimental: Combined Iriscope + EBUS
The use of Iriscope to improve the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in the setting of peripheral lung nodules

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy
Time Frame: Pathological diagnosis just after the bronchoscopy. In case of unspecified diagnosis after bronchoscopy, a follow up may be performed by chest ct scan up to 6 months.
The diagnosis will be obtained by pathological analysis. The diagnostic yield is the number of cases with a pathological diagnosis obtained by bronchoscopy on the total number of cases. In case of unspecified diagnosis, the fianal diagnosis will be given by the pathological naalysis of the surgical resection or chest CT follow up.
Pathological diagnosis just after the bronchoscopy. In case of unspecified diagnosis after bronchoscopy, a follow up may be performed by chest ct scan up to 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications of bronchoscopy
Time Frame: Just after the bronchoscopy to 1 month after the procedure
Number of participants that present a pneumothorax or hemorrhage after the bronchoscopy
Just after the bronchoscopy to 1 month after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olivier Taton, Resident, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary

3
Subscribe