Low Fresh Gas Flow in Prone Position

Low Fresh Gas Flow and Normal Gas Flow Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Surgery in Prone Position: Impact on Hemodynamics and Regional Cerebral Oxygenation

Low flow anesthesia in the prone position was safe in terms of systemic hemodynamics and did not reduce cerebral oxygenation compared to normal flow.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients were randomly allocated to either low fresh gas flow(LF, 0,5 L/min during maintenance) or normal flow (NF, 2 L/min)) general anesthesia. In both groups, participants were first administered with 100% oxygen at a 4 L/min flow rate. Propofol 2-2,5 mg/kg, rocuronium bromide 0,6 mg/kg, and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg IV were used for anesthesia induction.In the operating room, pulse rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation (spO2), and right and left side regional cerebral oxygen saturation (Masimo's O3 regional oximetry device) were measured before premedication and anesthesia induction, at 10 minutes after endotracheal intubation, at 10 minutes after prone positioning, at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th hours of operation, before repositioning to supine, after the resumption of supine position and at 5 minutes after extubation. In conclusion, low flow anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery in the prone position did not cause a reduction in cerebral oxygenation compared to normal flow.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sisli
      • Istanbul, Sisli, Turkey, 34384
        • Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing surgery in the prone position
  • having an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III
  • willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having a Glasgow coma scale (GSC) score ≤ 12
  • previous history of cranial surgery
  • advanced cardiovascular and/or pulmonary disease
  • mental retardation
  • neurological disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low Fresh Gas Flow in Prone Position
Low fresh gas flow (0,5 L/min during maintenance)
In the low fresh gas flow group, the flow rate was reduced to 0.5 L/min
Active Comparator: Normal Fresh Gas Flow in Prone Position
Normal flow (2 L/min) in general anesthesia.
In the normal flow rate group, the gas flow rate was reduced to 2 L/min during the maintenance phase.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Low and Normal Fresh Gas Flow Difference in Prone Position
Time Frame: Systemic and cerebral oxygenation values were measured 10 minutes after induction to general anesthesia and followed up to 10 minutes were left to completion of the surgery for about 5 hours, which may vary according to the duration of the surgery.
Whether low flow anesthesia in the prone position is safe in terms of systemic hemodynamics and cerebral oxygenation compared to normal flow anesthesia
Systemic and cerebral oxygenation values were measured 10 minutes after induction to general anesthesia and followed up to 10 minutes were left to completion of the surgery for about 5 hours, which may vary according to the duration of the surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Patient's sex, ages and additional conditions

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Low Fresh Gas Flow in Prone Position

Subscribe