Clinical Features and Rehabilitation Effect in Patients With Stroke (PCR)

August 3, 2022 updated by: Silvia Salvalaggio, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy

Clinical Features and Rehabilitation Effect for Upper Limb Recovery in Patients With Stroke: Retrospective Study

Dosage of rehabilitation therapy is a key factor in promoting motor functional recovery after stroke. To date, what is not yet known are the clinical features (e.g. the neurological profile, clinical history, motor, language and cognitive abilities), which allow the clinician to predict the recovery potential of a patient before rehabilitation, based on both the initial assessment and the various treatment pathways available in the National Health System. For these reasons, the study aims to explore clinical features and potential effect of rehabilitation dose that could influence upper limb motor recovery

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Dosage of rehabilitation therapy is a key factor in promoting motor functional recovery after stroke. Moreover, even though recent evidence has shown that cognitive abilities may support motor recovery, the relationship between cognitive-linguistic and motor skills in stroke patients is still a matter of research. Regarding the dose of intervention, in trials in which patients underwent 6 hours of rehabilitation per day, functional improvements in the upper limb reached clinically relevant levels, up to a difference of 8-11 points on the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity. To date, evidence of clinical (e.g. motor, cognitive-linguistic and neurological) and rehabilitation features that may influence upper limb recovery are still missing. Therefore, this study aims to retrospectively explore whether there is a relationship between clinical features and upper limb recovery after rehabilitation in stroke patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Venice
      • Venezia, Venice, Italy, 30126
        • San Camillo IRCCS Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with stroke hospitalised at San Camillo Hospital for a period of neurological rehabilitation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years
  • first-ever unilateral cortical-subcortical stroke, (ischemic or haemorrhagic)
  • completed at least 4 weeks of rehabilitation
  • preserved ability or possibility to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cerebellar or bilateral stroke
  • unstable medical conditions;
  • diagnosis of other neurological and/or psychiatric diseases in addition to stroke;
  • traumatic brain injury;
  • not released informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity
Time Frame: change from baseline up to 8 weeks
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity is a stroke-specific scale which assesses the upper limb motor functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. There are 3 values: 0 (severe impairment), 1 (moderate impairment), 2 (preserved function). The minimum value is 0 points, which corresponds to upper limb hemiplegia. The maximum value is 66 points, which corresponds to normal motor performance.
change from baseline up to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reaching Performance Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 8 weeks.
Reaching Performance Scale assesses the ability of subjects to reach an object (a cone). The cone is placed at both 4-cm (close) and 30-cm (far) distance from the subject. The subject is asked to reach and grab the cone if possible. The observer evaluates the quality of reaching instead of the grip strength. The minimum value is 0 points, which corresponds to incapacity of any ability of reaching an object. The maximum value is 36 points, which corresponds to the preservation of the ability of reaching an object.
Change from baseline up to 8 weeks.
Box & Blocks Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 8 weeks.
The patient has to carry as much cubes as possible, one by one, from a container to another one in one minute. The test is performed with both hands.
Change from baseline up to 8 weeks.
Oxford Cognitive Screen
Time Frame: at baseline
Oxford Cognitive Screen is a multidomains screening tool for the assessment of cognitive functions (e.g. attention, executive functions, linguistic functions, memory). For each domain, cut-off scores are calculated according to age and education levels. There is not an overall score, but for each domain pathological performances are identified according to normative data.
at baseline
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 8 weeks.
Spasticity is measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale of biceps muscle (Total score = 20 points). The therapist evaluates the spasticity of the muscle. There are 5 values: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone), 4 (affected part rigid in flexion or extension).
Change from baseline up to 8 weeks.
Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 8 weeks.
Functional Independence Measure scale is an 18-item scale that assesses the degree of independence in carrying out activities of daily living. There are 7 values: 1 (Total Assistance or not Testable), 2 (Maximal Assistance), 3 (Moderate Assistance), 4 (Minimal Assistance), 5 (Supervision), 6 (Modified Independence), 7 (Complete Independence). The minimum values is 18 points, which corresponds to the lower level of independence in activities of daily living. The maximum value is 126 points, which corresponds to the maximum level of independence in activities of daily living.
Change from baseline up to 8 weeks.
Dose of therapy
Time Frame: hospitalisation period (8 weeks)
Amount (in hours) of rehabilitation that patients underwent during hospitalisation
hospitalisation period (8 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Motor rehabilitation

Subscribe