Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) Versus Standard-dose CT

September 2, 2011 updated by: Kyoung Ho Lee, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Negative Appendectomy Rate Following Low-dose CT vs. Standard-dose CT

The purpose of this study is to determine whether low-dose CT is not inferior to standard-dose CT in the rate of unnecessary appendectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Acute appendicitis is a very common disease with the lifetime incidence of 7%. Abdomen CT is an established first-line diagnostic test in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Since many individuals suspected of having acute appendicitis are young, with a mean age of 30 years, CT radiation is of particular concern.

The estimated lifetime attributable risk of death from cancer due to the radiation exposure of a single abdomen CT study is 2-7/10,000 for average adults ranging 20-40 years in age.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether low-dose CT is not inferior to standard-dose CT in the negative appendectomy rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

891

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gyeonggi
      • Seongnam, Gyeonggi, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 44 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected of having acute appendicitis
  • Referred for abdomen CT from Emergency Department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2 (ultrasonography is favored)
  • Intravenous contrast-enhancement is contraindicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low-dose CT
2 mSv in an average patient (Low-dose (1/4 to 1/5 of standard-dose))
Other Names:
  • low-dose CT
8 mSv in an average patient (Standard-dose CT)
Other Names:
  • standard-dose CT
Active Comparator: Standard-dose CT
2 mSv in an average patient (Low-dose (1/4 to 1/5 of standard-dose))
Other Names:
  • low-dose CT
8 mSv in an average patient (Standard-dose CT)
Other Names:
  • standard-dose CT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Negative Appendectomy
Time Frame: 1 week after surgery
Number of participants with unnecessary appendectomies (removal of un-inflamed appendix)
1 week after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Additional Imaging Test(s)
Time Frame: 1 week after CT
Number of participants who need additional imaging test(s) to diagnose or rule out appendicitis
1 week after CT
Appendiceal Perforation
Time Frame: 1 week after surgery
Number of participants with appendiceal perforation
1 week after surgery
Interval Between CT and Appendectomy
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery
Time interval between the CT acquisition and non-incidental appendectomy
1 day after surgery
Interval Between CT and Discharge Without Surgery
Time Frame: 3 months after CT
Time interval between the CT acquisition and discharge without surgery
3 months after CT
Interval From CT to Discharge After Appendectomy
Time Frame: 3 months after CT
Time interval between the CT acquisition and discharge after appendectomy
3 months after CT
Likelihood of Appendicitis in CT Report in Patients Confirmed as Having Appendicitis
Time Frame: 3 months after CT

Grade 1. Definitely absent. Clinical observation is recommended. Grade 2. Probably absent. Clinical observation is recommended. Grade 3. Indeterminate. Clinical observation or surgical exploration is recommended.

Grade 4. Probably present. Surgical exploration is recommended. Grade 5. Definitely present. Surgical exploration is recommended. The data is used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver-operating-curve and to measure diagnostic confidence.

3 months after CT
Likelihood of Appendicitis in CT Report in Patients Confirmed as Not Having Appendicitis
Time Frame: 3 months after CT

Grade 1. Definitely absent. Clinical observation is recommended. Grade 2. Probably absent. Clinical observation is recommended. Grade 3. Indeterminate. Clinical observation or surgical exploration is recommended.

Grade 4. Probably present. Surgical exploration is recommended. Grade 5. Definitely present. Surgical exploration is recommended. The data are used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver-operating-curve and to measure diagnostic confidence.

3 months after CT
Diagnosis of Appendiceal Perforation in CT in Patients With Confirmed Appendicitis.
Time Frame: 3 months after CT

True positive: Perforation was rated as present in CT report and confirmed as present.

False positive: Perforation was rated as present in CT report and confirmed as absent.

True negative: Perforation was rated as absent in CT report and confirmed as absent.

False negative: Perforation was rated as absent in CT report and confirmed as present.

The data are used to calculate sensitivity and specificity.

3 months after CT
Visualization of the Normal Appendix
Time Frame: 3 months after CT
Grade 0. Not identified Grade 1. Unsure or partly visualized Grade 2. Clearly and entirely visualized
3 months after CT

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiation Dose
Time Frame: 1 day after CT
Radiation dose is measured in terms of dose-length product (mGy•cm) as displayed in the CT console. The "length" indicates the scan range.
1 day after CT
Estimate of Carcinogenic Risk Induced by CT Radiation
Time Frame: 1 day after CT
Age- and sex-specific carcinogenic risk induced by CT radiation. This is not an actual measurement but an estimate of the stochastic risk, based on assumption and calculation from radiation dose used.
1 day after CT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyuseok Kim, MD, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Kyoung Ho Lee, MD, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Appendicitis

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic CT

Subscribe