Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomotic After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy

November 28, 2023 updated by: Zhongtao Zhang, Beijing Friendship Hospital

A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomotic After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer (COLOR IV)

Background: Laparoscopic assisted right hemicolectomy is recommended for right colon cancer. As a more minimally invasive procedure, intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis has potential advantages: reducing torsion and traction on the mesentery, reducing skin incision length and enhancing postoperative recovery. However, the longer operative time, greater risk of intra-abdominal infection and steep learning curve for intestinal anastomosis performed under laparoscopic conditions, does this increase the incidence of postoperative complications, especially the incidence of anastomotic leakage, and whether it affects There is no high-level research evidence on the survival of patients.

Study design: COlOR IV study is an international prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study of intraperitoneal anastomosis versus extraperitoneal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer . The study will include a quality assessment phase before randomisation to ensure required competency level and uniformity of the intracorporeal and extracoporeal techniques.

Endpoint: Primary outcome is anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery. Main secondary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints are mortality and morbidity, postoperative recovery, overall survival, surgical specimen quality, quality of life.

Statistics: The primary endpoint is anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery. The anastomotic leakage rate was set to 2% in the both groups, and an increase in the incidence of anastomotic leakage of 2.5% was considered inferior. The one-sided significance level was 0.025, the power was 0.9. The dropout rate was 20%, and taking into account the post-randomization analysis (dropout 5%), the total sample size was 1158. There were 579 cases in the intracorporeal anastomosis group and 579 cases in the extracorporeal anastomosis group.

Main selection: Patients with histologically proven right colon cancer (cecum, ascending colon and proximal 1/3 of the transverse colon malignant tumor), clinically stage I-III, and intention for right hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis.

Hypothesis: The hypothesis is that intracoporeal anastomosis will have comparable anastomotic leak rate and 3-year DFS, but faster postoperative recovery with extracoporeal anastomosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1158

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: 18 ~ 80 years, male or female;
  2. Histological or cytological diagnosis of right colon cancer (cecum, ascending colon and proximal 1/3 of the transverse colon cancer);
  3. Stage I-III according to the AJCC-TNM classification including downstaged tumor based on adequate imaging of the thorax and abdomen;
  4. Intention for right hemicolectomy (including extended right hemicolectomy) with primary anastomosis;
  5. Informed consent according to local requirements Exclusion criteria

1) T4b tumor determined by CT scan; 2) Malignancy other than adenocarcinoma at histological examination ; 3)Other malignancies in medical history, except adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri; 4) Previous history of colorectal cancer or synchronous multiple colorectal malignancies; 5) Complications requiring emergency surgery (obstruction, perforation, etc); 6) Planned synchronous abdominal organ resections; 7) Pregnant or lactating women; 8) Familial Adenomatosis Polyposis Coli (FAP), active Crohn's disease or active ulcerative colitis; 9) Absolute contraindication to general anesthesia or laparoscopic surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intracorporeal anastomotic after LRC
Complete laparoscopic dissection of the mesocolon is mandatory. D2 or D3/CME is optional. And the extent of colon resection is based on the location of the tumor while the ileocecal resection is excluded. After fully mobilization of the colon and mesentery, the terminal ileum and transverse colon will be transected by a laparoscopic linear stapler. The side-to-side anastomosis is performed laparoscopically. The enterotomy is closed by a double-layer suture. All the anastomotic procedures are completed laparoscopically. The specimen is then removed through a Pfannenstiel incision within a specimen bag.
Active Comparator: Extracorporeal anastomotic after LRC
The procedures of the mobilization and vessel ligation are similar. After that, the mobilized colon and terminal ileum are brought out through the upper mid-line incision with the wound protector. The colon and terminal ileum are similarly dissected distally to the specimen with a stapling device. The side-to-side anastomosis is completed and the anastomotic site is reinforced. The anastomotic bowel is returned to the abdominal cavity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anastomotic leak
Time Frame: 30 days

Anastomotic leakage is defined as a defect of the intestinal wall at the anastomotic site leading to a communication between intra- and extraluminal compartments.

Diagnosis of anastomotic leakage: The radiological examination (CT abdomen) will be completed if clinically suspected AL. AL is confirmed clinically, radiologically, endoscopically or intraoperatively. The severity of anastomotic leakage was judged with reference to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Disease-free survival rate
Time Frame: 3/5 years
Main secondary outcome
3/5 years
Overall survival
Time Frame: 3/5 years
3/5 years
morbidity
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: Intraoperative
from incision to suture completion
Intraoperative
Duration of anastomosis
Time Frame: Intraoperative
from the start of dissection of the bowel to the compeletion of the anastomosis
Intraoperative
Surgical incision length
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative
Conversion rate
Time Frame: 1 month
conversion to open surgery or conversion to extracorporeal anastomosis
1 month
Pain score (VAS score)
Time Frame: 1-3 days
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be'). Ask the patient to rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line.
1-3 days
Time to first flatus passage after surgery
Time Frame: 1 month
The day of surgery is day 0. The time interval between the day of the first flatus passage after surgery and the day of surgery.
1 month
Time to first stool passage after surgery
Time Frame: up to 1 week
The day of surgery is day 0. The time interval between the day of the first stool passage after surgery and the day of surgery.
up to 1 week
Time to first oral intake
Time Frame: up to 1 week
The day of surgery is day 0. The time interval between the day of the first oral intake after surgery and the day of surgery.
up to 1 week
Length of hospital stay after surgery
Time Frame: 1 month
days from surgery to discharge
1 month
Specimen quality
Time Frame: 1 month

West pathological assessment criteria. Grading of the plane of mesocolic dissection.

  1. Muscularis propria plane:little bulk to mesocolon with disruptions extending down onto the muscularis propriapropria
  2. Intramesocolic plane: moderate bulk to mesocolon with irregularity but the incisions do not reach down to the muscularis propria
  3. Mesocolic plane: intact mesocolon with a smooth peritoneal-lined surface
1 month
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
EORTC QLQ-CR29 and C30: questionnaires to evaluate the overall quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer, including 30 and 29 items, respectively, to score patients' overall quality of life, function, and symptoms. These are coded with four-point scales, namely "Not at all", "A little", "Quite a bit" and "Very much."
1 year
health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
EQ 5D-5L (Euroqol): This questionnaire is a simple, generic tool for describing and assessing health-related quality of life. It consists of 5 items (mobility, personal care, activities of daily living, pain and anxiety and depression) that answer questions on a 5-point scale ranging from "no problem" (level 1) to "very severe" (level 5).
1 year
Incision herniation
Time Frame: 1 year
The incision herniation is classified by the criteria of the European Hernia Society. The location (Midline/Lateral) and size (length and width) of the herniation will be recorded.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhongtao Zhang, Prof, Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
  • Principal Investigator: Hendrik J Bonjer, Prof, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
  • Study Director: Hongwei Yao, Prof, Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We are not sharing confidential individual patient data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colon Cancer

Clinical Trials on Intracorporeal anastomotic after LRC

Subscribe