Early Education Programme in Malnourished Cancer Patients (NEHOTEL)

August 10, 2022 updated by: Beauvais Hospital

Feasibility of Early Nutritional Prehabilitation Through a Therapeutic Education Programme for Cancer People With Potential Risk of Malnutrition

The innovation is based on the proposal to integrate the patient, just after the announcement, before or at the beginning of the treatment (before the third session of chemotherapy or radiotherapy), in a 5-day training course in a clinical site that inspires peace of mind involving the family caregiver. The therapeutic education programme is led by a multidisciplinary team whose approach is centred on dietetics, supported by tools for encouragement via socio-aesthetics, physical activity and sophrology.

The educational objective is to promote the autonomy of the patient as well as the family caregiver, to involve them in the care pathway alongside the practitioners, with a view to contain undernutrition and reverse the spiral that increases the risks of morbi-mortality.

The aim of the study is to assess patient adherence to the device, the technical and economic feasibility, and its impact on quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • From 18 to 70 years old
  • Patient with an ORL, pancreatic, oesogastric, duodenal or broncho-pulmonary cancer
  • Patient who have not begun their treatments or patient in the beginning of their treatments, less than or equal to two sessions of chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • patient living in a private home (personal or family)
  • Prognosis greater than 12 months
  • Decision taken at a multidisciplinary consultation meeting (RCP) for a curative treatment
  • WHO Score Performance Status ≤2
  • Patient undernourished at the advertisement codes E44.1 "Mild protein-energy malnutrition" or E44.0 "Moderate protein-energy malnutrition", according to the latest HAS recommendations
  • Patient not undernourished at the time of the announcement, but going to receive a treatment or combination of treatments for curative purposes, whose therapeutic sequences are known to induce nutritional complications inducing a risk of stopping treatment
  • Per os nutrition
  • With internet access and reachable by phone
  • Patient affiliated to the social security system
  • Patient information and signature of informed consent
  • Patient accompanied by a family member or not

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with severe malnutrition corresponding to at least one of the criteria* below:

    (i) BMI < 17 kg/m². (ii) weight loss ≥ 10% in 1 month or ≥ 15% in 6 months or ≥ 15% of the usual weight before the onset of the disease (iii) albuminemia ≤ 30 g/L. (*) Annex 15.8: HAS 2019 source : A single criterion of severe undernutrition takes precedence over one or more criteria of moderate undernutrition.

  • Treatment for curative purposes not applicable
  • Comorbidities that do not allow participation in the prehabilitation course (patient presenting at least one of the criteria below):

Weight greater than 130kgs (limit of resistance of the beds in the reception centre) Sensory deficits: visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory (not allowing to follow the educational workshops) Cognitive deficit (reading, writing, counting) Physical (ability to move around and participate in activities) Patient at risk of alcohol withdrawal

  • TNM coupled with a deteriorated general condition of the patient at the time of the announcement; prediction of highly mutilating surgery involving an inability to eat through the mouth; metastatic stage.
  • Patient institutionalized and/or not responsible for his or her diet
  • Patient requiring parenteral or artificial enteral nutrition (feeding tube, nasogastric tube, gastrostomy or feeding jejunostomy)
  • History of organ failure (cirrhosis, moderate or severe renal failure, heart failure (NYHA>2), chronic oxygen-dependent respiratory failure)
  • Anaemic patient (hemoglobin level less than 9g/dL)
  • Person deprived of liberty or under guardianship
  • Inability to undergo the medical monitoring of the trial for geographical, social or psychological reasons.
  • Pregnant woman or Breastfeeding woman
  • A delay before the first treatment does not allow inclusion in the NEHOTEL prehabilitation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Nutritional educative programme
5 days educative programme before treatment
Stakeholders give preventive therapeutic education recommandations in their specific expertize
Other Names:
  • Therapeutic education for patients in sophrology
  • Therapeutic education for patients in socio-aesthetic
  • Therapeutic education for patients in adapted physical activity
  • Therapeutic education for patients in psychology

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of acceptance
Time Frame: during the 5-days programme
Evaluation of the rate of screening failures and the explanation of refusals when the program is offered to patients (CONSORT Standards)
during the 5-days programme
Rate of patients' skills development during the therapeutic educative programme
Time Frame: 8 months
Rate of patients completing the stay and demonstrating ongoing or effective acquisition on 18 skills (self-reported questionnaire and confronted with observations of nursing staff) (acquired, in progress of acquisition, not acquired)
8 months
Programme and environment (hosting) satisfaction questionnaire assessment
Time Frame: during the 5-days programme
Patient's motivational level during the therapeutic educative programme
during the 5-days programme
Acceptance of treatment assessment
Time Frame: 8 months
Alliance to care during the 8 months of follow-up via the IDP. This is measured by the number of PTE sessions the patients enroll and by questions on the application of the nutritional advices given during the intervention week
8 months
Assessment of the programme's cost
Time Frame: during the 5-days programme
Calculation of "cost-utility" and "cost-effectiveness" based on a group of 6 people by PTE session
during the 5-days programme
Real cost estimation
Time Frame: during the 5-days programme
Estimation of avoided costs and calculation of the difference with the actual consolidated cost of the NEHOTEL stay
during the 5-days programme

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Questionnaire related to cancer (QLQ C30) to assess the patients' quality of life
Time Frame: 8 months
Scale from 0 (worse quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life)
8 months
Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck (QLQ H&N35) to assess the patients' quality of life
Time Frame: 8 months
Scale from 0 (worse quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life)
8 months
Number of therapeutic events completed
Time Frame: 8 months
Number of therapeutic events completed compared to the initial objective (IDP)
8 months
The count of adverse events related or not to treatment
Time Frame: 8 months
The count of adverse events related or not to treatment
8 months
Anthropomorphic markers (weight in kilograms)
Time Frame: 8 months
Evolution of cancer biomarkers (IDP) to asses the evolution of undernutrition
8 months
Anthropomorphic markers (height in meters)
Time Frame: 8 months
Evolution of cancer biomarkers (IDP) to asses the evolution of undernutrition
8 months
anthropomorphic markers (weight and height are used to calculate the BMI in kg/m^2)
Time Frame: 8 months
evolution of cancer biomarkers (IDP) to asses the evolution of undernutrition
8 months
Biological markers (quantity of albumine in blood)
Time Frame: 8 months
Evolution of cancer biomarkers (IDP) to asses the evolution of undernutrition
8 months
Biological markers (quantity of lymphocyte in blood)
Time Frame: 8 months
Evolution of cancer biomarkers (IDP) to asses the evolution of undernutrition
8 months
Biological markers (quantity of albumine and lymphocyte in blood are used to calculate the PNI with the formula [10 * taux albumine (g/dL)] + [nombre de lymphocytes totaux/µL * 0,05])
Time Frame: 8 months
Evolution of cancer biomarkers (IDP) to asses the evolution of undernutrition
8 months
Food intake quantity and quality estimation with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 8 months
Scale from 0 (no food intake) to 10 (normal quatity food intake) to assess the evolution of undernutrition
8 months
Consumption of Nutritional Oral Complements (NOC)
Time Frame: 8 months
Evolution of NOC's consumption to assess the evolution of undernutrition
8 months
Borg Rating Scale of Perceived Exertion (Borg) scale after a physical activity to assess the physical activity and the effectiveness of reinforcement tools
Time Frame: 8 months
Score between 0 (no perceived effort) and 20 (perceived effort maximal)
8 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) to assess the physical activity and the effectiveness of reinforcement tools
Time Frame: 8 months
Evolution of the time of intense activity, moderate activity, light intensity and sedentary
8 months
World Health Organisation (WHO) scale to evaluate the capacity to move to assess the physical activity and the effectiveness of reinforcement tools
Time Frame: 8 months
Scale from 0 (same capacity than before the surgery) to 4 (incapacity to move alone)
8 months
Drawing test Questionnaire to assess the socio-aesthetic programme and the patients' self-esteem
Time Frame: 8 months
Evolution between the first drawing test at the beginning of the week and the second at the end
8 months
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg) questionnaire to assess the socio-aesthetic programme and the patients' self-esteem
Time Frame: 8 months
Final score between 10 (worse self-esteem and 40 (best self-esteem))
8 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale to assess the sophrology programme and the patients' anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 8 months
Two scales (one for anxiety and one for depression) from 0 (worse well-being) to 21 (best well-being)
8 months
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-VAS) to assess the sophrology programme and the patients' well-being
Time Frame: 8 months
Scale from 0 (worse health) to 100 (best health)
8 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Zarit scale to evaluate the motivation and the effectiveness of the presence of the caregiver
Time Frame: during the 5-days programme
Scale from 0 (taking care is not constraining for the caregiver) to 88 (taking care is a very heavy load for the caregiver)
during the 5-days programme
Getting started with the eCRF application (Diétis) by patients
Time Frame: during the 5-days programme

Rate of errors in filling in the Dietis tool by patients during the intervention week.

Number of times the Dietis tool questionnaires were completed by patients during the intervention week

during the 5-days programme
Assessment of the level of adherence to the application tool (Diétis) during the follow-up of 8 months
Time Frame: 8 months
Rate of complete questionnaires and responses to the dietétician calls during the follow-up
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sif Dr Bendjaballah, Doctor, Beauvais hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NEHOTEL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The PNI will be calculated by the following equation: [(10 × serum albumin (g/dL)) + (0.005 × total lymphocyte count)].

Albumin Pre-albumin CRP Haemoglobin

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nutrition Aspect of Cancer

Clinical Trials on Therapeutic education for patients in nutrition

Subscribe