Nutrition Assessment in Advanced Cancer Patients

March 14, 2024 updated by: Xingchen Peng, West China Hospital

The Predictive Value of PG-SGA Criteria in Advanced Cancer Patients

The goal of this retrospective observational study is to evaluate the prognostic value of nutrition assessment tool in advanced cancers. We aim to evaluate the clinical utility of nutrition assessment tool in predicting the clinical outcomes of cancer patients, which would help the clinicians to make tailored decision for this population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To date, cancer is the leading cause of disability and death globally. Cancer-related mortality rate differs significantly across the world, reflecting varying patterns of inherent genetic heterogeneity and medical resources available factors. Considerable proportions of patients remained diagnosed with advanced-stage cancers at the initial visit, given the differences between demographic geographical and socioeconomic regions, and inadequate resources of China. For this reason, how to make adequate clinical management and prognostic prediction for advanced-stage cancers are still challenged. Malnutrition is prevalent in cancer patients, accounting for approximately 20% to 80% of the cancer population, which plays a key role in the short-and long-term clinical outcomes. Providing more real-world clinical evidence for supporting the beneficial role of nutritional screening in advanced-stage cancers can help to improve clinical nursing care for advanced-stage patients, especially in developing countries.

The malnutrition status of cancer patients is often accompanied by symptoms of poor nutrient intake, weight loss, progress of systemic inflammatory disorders, and upregulated immune responses. Emerging evidence has determined that the systemic pro-inflammation status was positively associated with elevated malnutritional scores and consistently predicted the worse survival probabilities of cancer patients. Notably, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) expert consensus regarding the action against cancer-related malnutrition recommended that nutritionists were encouraged to use additional biomarkers to assess the severity of cancer-related systemic inflammation burdens, which might enhance the predictive value of existing malnutritional screening tools in clinical practice. Although the PG-SGA criteria, the nutrition assessment tool, has been widely interpreted and validated to be a simple and easily available tool for the prognosis prediction for varied cancers in recent years, the criteria of the PG-SGA lacked the calculation of systemic inflammatory burdens. Whether the inflammatory indicators could be the surrogate biomarkers for enhancing the prediction ability of PG-SGA for advanced-stage cancer patients remains less studied. Therefore, we aim to fill the mentioned research gaps to conduct this observational study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2115

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan Universit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

In this study, all of the cancer types were reviewed. The histological information of cancer types was confirmed by the biopsy or resected surgical specimen. The tumor stages were classified based on the guidelines of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Manual (8th edition) (32) at the initial admission. Patients with the following clinical characteristics were excluded, such as those with incomplete nutritional evaluation, incomplete blood indicator test, and loss of follow-up. Furthermore, some cancer types with small sample sizes (<20 cases) were also excluded from the analysis because of the study's validity concerns. Ultimately, eleven types of cancers (lung cancer, colorectal cancer, esophagus cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, lymphoma, urinary cancer, breast cancer, and cancer with unknown primary sites) of interest were further investigated.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced cancers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged below 18
  • Incomplete blood tests
  • Incomplete follow-up data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Nov 11, 2019 to 11 Sep, 2023
the all-cause mortality of cancer patients
Nov 11, 2019 to 11 Sep, 2023

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: Nov 11, 2019 to 11 Sep, 2023
the days of length of stay in hospital
Nov 11, 2019 to 11 Sep, 2023

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-725

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data was confidential

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Cancer

Subscribe