Unilateral Epidural Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Combined Femoro-sciatic Nerves Block for Patients With Low Ejection Fraction

August 16, 2022 updated by: RAMY AHMED, Ain Shams University

Comparative Study Between Intentional Unilateral Epidural Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Combined Femoro-sciatic Nerves Block for Patients With Low Ejection Fraction Undergoing Insertion of Nail Tibia for Fixation of Fracture Shaft Tibia

compare unilateral epidural anesthesia versus femoral/sciatic nerve block by ultrasound guided as anesthetic technique for cases with low ejection fraction undergoing insertion of nail tibia for fixation of fracture shaft tibia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Group A ;( Unilateral epidural anesthesia group) Forty patients with low ejection fraction (30-40%) will do elective insertion of nail tibia for fixation of fracture shaft tibia using unilateral epidural anesthesia.

Group B;;( Ultrasound guided femoro/ sciatic nerve block group) Forty patients with low ejection fraction (30-40%) will do elective insertion of nail tibia for fixation of fracture shaft tibia by femoral/sciatic nerve block using ultrasound guidance.

For each patient, onset of sensory and motor block, degree of motor block, sign of sensory block in the contralateral lower limb for the epidural group, success in providing adequate anesthesia, hemodynamic changes, time of first analgesic request will be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 20
        • Ain Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 60 years old.
  • Patients scheduled for elective insertion of nail tibia for fixation of fracture shaft tibia.
  • Patients with low ejection fraction (30-40%).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Uncooperative patient
  • Unconscious patients
  • Cases with head trauma
  • History of relevant drug allergy to local anesthetics
  • Local infection at the site of the block
  • Patients with coagulopathies and impaired platelet functions
  • Patients with hemodynamic instability
  • Previous neurological deficit in lower limb and previous femoral artery grafts or injuries.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Unilateral epidural anesthesia group
Forty patients with low ejection fraction (30-40%) will do elective insertion of nail tibia for fixation of fracture shaft tibia using unilateral epidural anesthesia.
Forty patients with low ejection fraction (30-40%) will do elective insertion of nail tibia for fixation of fracture shaft tibia using unilateral epidural anesthesia.
Other Names:
  • Ultrasound guided femoro/ sciatic nerve block
Active Comparator: Ultrasound guided femoro/ sciatic nerve block group
Forty patients with low ejection fraction (30-40%) will do elective insertion of nail tibia for fixation of fracture shaft tibia by femoral/sciatic nerve block using ultrasound guidance.
Forty patients with low ejection fraction (30-40%) will do elective insertion of nail tibia for fixation of fracture shaft tibia by femoral/sciatic nerve block using ultrasound guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
mean blood pressure
Time Frame: 20 minutes after anesthesia
20 minutes after anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
adequate sensory block
Time Frame: 20 minutes after the block
20 minutes after the block
adequate motor block
Time Frame: 15 minutes after the block
15 minutes after the block
time of first analgesic request
Time Frame: within 24 hours after the block
within 24 hours after the block

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OFT IRB00006379

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Ejection Fraction Patients

Clinical Trials on unilateral epidural anesthesia

Subscribe