Leg Heat Therapy in Elderly Individuals

July 8, 2024 updated by: Bruno Roseguini, Purdue University

Home-based Leg Heat Therapy to Improve Walking Performance in Elderly Individuals: a Pilot Trial

This pilot randomized, sham-controlled trial aimed to establish the feasibility and safety of home-based leg HT in community-dwelling older adults and inform the design of a future, larger study. Participants were randomized to either an HT or a sham group and were asked to apply the treatment daily for 90 min over 12 consecutive weeks. The primary outcomes were compliance with the HT regimen, measured by a hidden timer, completion rates, and device safety. The secondary goals were to examine the effects of leg HT on 6-min walk distance, sit-to-stand performance, blood pressure, quality of life, and the morphology and strength of the calf muscles, as assessed using combined T1-weighted and mDixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Building upon previous findings in young individuals, preclinical models of PAD, and older individuals with PAD, we hypothesized that older adults treated with leg HT for 12 weeks would display improved walking performance, increased calf strength, and reduced intramuscular fat when compared to sham-treated individuals.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aging and a sedentary lifestyle are associated with a progressive deterioration of skeletal muscle contractile function and cardiorespiratory fitness, resulting in an impaired capacity to perform daily activities and maintain independent functioning. Few therapeutic options exist to combat the skeletal muscle abnormalities and restore muscle strength in older individuals. Heat therapy (HT) is a practical, non-invasive therapeutic tool that has been shown to elicit beneficial adaptations in both vasculature and skeletal muscle. This pilot randomized, sham-controlled trial aimed to establish the feasibility and safety of home-based leg HT in community-dwelling older adults and inform the design of a future, larger study. Participants were randomized to either an HT or a sham group and were asked to apply the treatment daily for 90 min over 12 consecutive weeks. The primary outcomes were compliance with the HT regimen, measured by a hidden timer, completion rates, and device safety. The secondary goals were to examine the effects of leg HT on 6-min walk distance, sit-to-stand performance, blood pressure, quality of life, and the morphology and strength of the calf muscles, as assessed using combined T1-weighted and mDixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Building upon previous findings in young individuals, preclinical models of PAD, and older individuals with PAD, we hypothesized that older adults treated with leg HT for 12 weeks would display improved walking performance, increased calf strength, and reduced intramuscular fat when compared to sham-treated individuals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47907
        • Purdue University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Participants must be:

  1. 65 yrs or older
  2. Sedentary - Exercise less than three days/week, 20 minutes per day.
  3. Non smokers

The exclusion criteria consisted of:

  1. smoking
  2. reliance on a walking aid other than a cane
  3. having active cancer
  4. inability to fit into water-circulating trousers
  5. inability to complete the 6-minute walk test
  6. being under 65 years of age
  7. scoring less than 23 on the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MSSE)
  8. having impaired thermal sensation in the leg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham control
Participants will be provided a leg heat therapy system and will be instructed to apply the therapy daily (90 min/day) for 12 consecutive weeks. The water heater will circulate water at 33ºC.
The leg heat therapy device consists of a water tank coupled with a circulator, a sous-vide water heater and water-circulating trousers. The water heater in the sham device is adjusted to heat up the water to 33ºC.
Experimental: Heat therapy
Participants will be provided a leg heat therapy system and will be instructed to apply the therapy daily (90 min/day) for 12 consecutive weeks. The water heater will circulate water at 42ºC.
The leg heat therapy device consists of a water tank coupled with a circulator, a sous-vide water heater and water-circulating trousers. The water heater in the sham device is adjusted to heat up the water to 42ºC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-week follow-up
A built-in timer inside the pump that is inaccessible to participants will provide one assessment of patient compliance with the therapy. Compliance will be determined by dividing the number of hours of HT recorded use by the required hours. In addition, patients in both groups will receive a logbook to record their treatment sessions.
Baseline to 12-week follow-up
Completion rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-week follow-up
Completion rates will be defined as the number of patients attending the follow-up assessments.
Baseline to 12-week follow-up
Safety
Time Frame: Baseline through 12-week follow-up
The study coordinator will call patients weekly to record: 1) the dates and times in which the treatment was applied, 2) BP values prior to and immediately after the end of each session, 3) the occurrence of symptoms, such as faintness or dizziness after exposure to the therapy, and 4) changes in medical status or medications. Adverse events (AEs) will be tracked throughout the study and used as a surrogate for safety-related outcomes.
Baseline through 12-week follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-minute walk distance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-week follow-up
The investigators will determine whether home-based leg heat therapy improves the 6-minute walk distance at 12-week follow-up compared to the sham treatment.
Baseline to 12-week follow-up
Triceps surae peak torque
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-week follow-up
The investigators will determine whether home-based leg heat therapy improves the peak torque of the triceps surae at 12-week follow-up compared to the sham treatment.
Baseline to 12-week follow-up
Repeated chair rises
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-week follow-up
The investigators will determine whether home-based leg heat therapy improves the time to complete 5 chair rises at 12-week follow-up compared to the sham treatment.
Baseline to 12-week follow-up
Short-Form (SF)-36 Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-week follow-up
The investigators will determine whether home-based leg heat therapy improves the score in the Short-Form (SF)-36 Questionnaire at 12-week follow-up compared to the sham treatment.
Baseline to 12-week follow-up
Triceps sure volume and cross-sectional area
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-week follow-up
The investigators will determine whether home-based leg heat therapy enhances the volume and cross-sectional area of the triceps sure at 12-week follow-up compared to the sham treatment.
Baseline to 12-week follow-up
Triceps sure fat content
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-week follow-up
The investigators will determine whether home-based leg heat therapy reduces the fat content of the triceps sure at 12-week follow-up compared to the sham treatment.
Baseline to 12-week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Weakness

Clinical Trials on Sham device

Subscribe