Relationship and Central Mechanism Between Diabetes and Cognitive Impairment Based on Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Approach and Peripheral Neuropathology Biomarkers Assay

A Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Study to Investigate the Relationship and Central Mechanism Between Diabetes and Cognitive Impairment Based on Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Approach and Peripheral Neuropathology Biomarkers Assay

This is a cross-sectional and longitudinal study to investigate the relationship and central mechanism between type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment based on the simultaneous EEG-fMRI approach and peripheral neuropathology biomarkers assay.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Little is known about the high risks of cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in people with type 2 diabetes. The goal of this study is to characterize brain imaging biomarkers of preclinical AD and related cognitive impairment in people with type 2 diabetes using the simultaneous EEG-fMRI approach and peripheral neuropathology biomarkers assay. We will recruit 400 patients with type 2 diabetes in the outpatient and inpatient departments. Each subject will undergo simultaneous EEG-fMRI scan, classical multimodal MRI scan, cognitive assessments and peripheral neuropathology biomarkers assay at the baseline. This study will qualify gray matter volume, cortical thickness, gray matter and white matter microstructure, cerebral blood flow, spectrum changes, as well as resting state and dynamic functional network connectivity from the imaging examination. Study duration was 3 years with a follow-up every 12 months. Cognitive assessments and imaging scan will be conducted in each follow-up visits. At the end of the study, all of the assessments will be performed again for all recruited subjects.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210008
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

38 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

T2DM patients will be recruited from the outpatient and inpatient units of the endocrinology department of the investigator's hospital. Healthy control will be recruited in the community

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 40-75 years
  • Right handedness
  • Possessed over 6-year education
  • Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Control participants would be excluded if they had a fasting blood glucose level >7.0 mmol/L; glucose level> 7.8 mmol/L after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); HbA1c>5.7%
  • Control participants would be excluded if they had a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, Beijing edition) score of < 26
  • History of other dementia-related neurological or psychiatric disorders, including psychotic developmental disorders, mania, depression, and schizophrenia
  • Central neural system diseases, including traumatic brain injury, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute cerebral infarction
  • Acute complications of diabetes, including diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state, and hypoglycemic coma
  • Complicated with severe impairment of liver, kidney or heart function
  • Metal implants, unable to complete the MR scanning
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Type 2 Diabetes
These patients must have a definite diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards. Some of these patients have symptoms of cognitive impairment, while others have normal cognition.
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Boston Naming Test (BNT), Digit Span Test (DST), Trail Making Test (TMT).
EEG recordings were conducted with a 64-channel MR-compatible EEG system (Electrical Geodesics Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) and an MR-compatible EEG cap (HydroCel Geodesic Sensor Nets), using ring-type sintered silver chloride electrodes with iron-free copper leads.
3D T1-weighted imaging, Resting-state fMRI, Diffusion tensor imaging, Arterial spin labeling.
Detecting the peripheral blood neuropathology biomarkers using single molecule array (Simoa) technique, including Aβ40, Aβ42, P-tau 181, P-tau 231, GFAP and NfL.
Healthy Control
These participants have normal glucose tolerance and normal cognition.
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Boston Naming Test (BNT), Digit Span Test (DST), Trail Making Test (TMT).
EEG recordings were conducted with a 64-channel MR-compatible EEG system (Electrical Geodesics Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) and an MR-compatible EEG cap (HydroCel Geodesic Sensor Nets), using ring-type sintered silver chloride electrodes with iron-free copper leads.
3D T1-weighted imaging, Resting-state fMRI, Diffusion tensor imaging, Arterial spin labeling.
Detecting the peripheral blood neuropathology biomarkers using single molecule array (Simoa) technique, including Aβ40, Aβ42, P-tau 181, P-tau 231, GFAP and NfL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline cognitive performance
Time Frame: Day 1 of entry study
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, ranges from 0 to 30, and higher scores mean better cognition.
Day 1 of entry study
Baseline peripheral blood neuropathology biomarkers level
Time Frame: Blood samples will be collected on day 1 of the entry study and preserved at -81 °C in the Biobank of Drum Tower Hospital until examination.
Aβ40, Aβ42, P-tau 181, P-tau 231, GFAP and NfL.
Blood samples will be collected on day 1 of the entry study and preserved at -81 °C in the Biobank of Drum Tower Hospital until examination.
Baseline simultaneous EEG-fMRI
Time Frame: Within 1 week after cognitive assessments
Frequency domain and spectrum domain analyses
Within 1 week after cognitive assessments
Baseline brain structural MRI scan
Time Frame: Within 1 week after cognitive assessments
Cortical morphology
Within 1 week after cognitive assessments
Baseline brain functional MRI scan
Time Frame: Within 1 week after cognitive assessments
Large-scale network functional connectivity
Within 1 week after cognitive assessments

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Longitudinal changes of cognitive performance
Time Frame: From baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
Compare the change of MoCA score from baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
From baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
Longitudinal changes of peripheral blood neuropathology biomarkers level
Time Frame: From baseline to final follow-up time points (36 months).
Compare the changes of peripheral blood neuropathology biomarkers level from baseline to final follow-up time points (36 months).
From baseline to final follow-up time points (36 months).
Longitudinal changes of simultaneous EEG-fMRI
Time Frame: From baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
Compare the change of frequency domain and spectrum domain from baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
From baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
Longitudinal changes of brain structural MRI scan
Time Frame: From baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
Compare the changes of cortical morphology from baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
From baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
Longitudinal changes of brain functional MRI scan
Time Frame: From baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
Compare the changes of large-scale network functional connectivity from baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).
From baseline to each follow-up time points (6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30months, 36 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

IPD sharing will be made during the 12 months after the end of study, and the original data can be obtained from the PI if necessary.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

during the 12 months after the end of study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Cognitive assessments

3
Subscribe