Evaluation of the Impact of a Digital Tool MEDIASCREEN of Preventive Information for Patients on the Knowledge of the Risk of Pressure Sores Acquired During a Hospitalization (EDUCESCARRES)

Evaluation of the Impact of a Digital Tool MEDIASCREEN of Preventive Information for Patients on the Knowledge of the Risk of Pressure Sores Acquired During a Hospitalization, a Randomized Controlled Pilot Interventional Study in Single Blind

The study focuses on the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN tool on the knowledge, technical know-how and behavioural skills in terms of pressure sores of patients. In addition, the cognitive impact of this type of tool will also be studied in our study population (self-esteem and feeling of personal effectiveness). The objective is to compare the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool with information tool compared to the usual paper-based prevention materials on knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pressure Sore
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Paper prevention; Other: Numeric prevention

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 100
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• France
  • Bretagne
    • Rennes, Bretagne, France, 35000
      • Pôle Saint-Hélier

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patient in complete hospitalization in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
• Patient affiliated to a social security system
• Patient presenting a low to high risk of pressure ulcer inferior or equal to or equal to 16 on the Norton scale
• Patient having signed his consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Difficulty understanding and is unable to give free and informed consent
• Pregnant women
• Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative administrative decision
• Major under legal protection by a judicial or administrative decision.
• Person in an emergency situation unable to give their informed consent

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Other: Paper Information; Patient will have classic paper information for prevention of pressure sores	Other: Paper prevention; Information for prevention of pressure sores in classic way with paper
Experimental: Numeric information from MEDIASCREEN; Patient will have information for prevention of pressure sores throught the digital tool MEDIASCREEN	Other: Numeric prevention; Numeric information for prevention of pressure sores thgrough digital tool MEDIASCREEN

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Evaluate the change on the knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores with a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool in comparison to the usual paper-based prevention materials	The comparison will be done with Skin-Management Needs Assessment Checklist score (SMNac). Minimum value =0, Maximum value = 100; higher score better outcome.	Change from baseline knowledge at 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Evaluate patient satisfaction with the information delivered by the MEDIASCREEN digital tool	Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : "Not at all satisfied" and 100 : "Completely satisfied". Higher scores better outcome.	At 1 month
Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on self-esteem.	Measured of self-esteem with Rosenberg scale. Score range : 10-40. High scores indicate high self esteem.	At the beginning and at 1 month
Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on sense of self-efficacy.	Measured of self-efficacy with scale to evaluate the feeling of personal effectiveness (MSES) Score range: 16-80. High scores indicate high feeling of personal effectiveness.	At the beginning and at 1 month
Evaluate the psychological impact of information delivered from the tools	Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : "No knowledge" and 100 : "Perfectly mastered subject". Higher scores better outcome.	At 1 month
Evaluate the occurrence of pressure sores during hospitalization	Count of the apparition number of pressure sores.	At the beginning and at 1 month
Evaluate the acquisition of knowledge by patients	Evaluate with questionnaire of knowledge, compose by 5 questions on three points each. The overall questionnaire will be on 15 points. Higher scores better outcome.	At 1 month
Evaluate the user experience when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN.	Measured by Questionnaire Attrakdiff for the user experience. The AttrakDiff questionnaire contains 28 question with 7 Likert-type scale from -3 to 3.	At 1 month
Evaluate the observance when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN.	Measured by the connexion data : number of connexion, duration of connexion, percentage of completion.	At 1 month
Evaluate the acceptability of the digital information tool MEDIASCREEN digital information tool or the paper information brochure.	The acceptability will be assessed using a 13-item questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Each question is based on a Likert-type 5 point scale ranging from : 1=In total disagreement, 2= Somewhat disagree, 3= Neither agree nor disagree, 4= Somewhat agree, 5=In total agreement.	At the beggining and at 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Pôle Saint Hélier
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Aurélie Duruflé, Pôle Saint Hélier

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 27, 2022
• Primary Completion (Actual): January 16, 2025
• Study Completion (Actual): January 16, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 7, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 16, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): September 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 30, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 29, 2025
• Last Verified: July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Skin Diseases; Skin Ulcer; Pressure Ulcer
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2022-A00520-43

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No