Laparoscopic Central and Anterior Compartment Prolapse Surgery: A Meshless Sacrocolpopexy Technique

September 28, 2022 updated by: Resul Karakuş, Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital
Mesh is widely applied in the abdominal approach to pelvic organ prolapse surgery, and sacrocolpopexy-sacrohysteropexy is the gold standard application, particularly for central compartment abnormalities. There are numerous disadvantages associated with the use of mesh. In some studies, the rate of mesh complications (such as mesh erosion, contraction, response, and pain) can reach 20%. This surgical approach aims to provide laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse without the use of mesh, hence avoiding the difficulties associated with mesh.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients who present to the Zeynep Kamil Education and Research Hospital Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic between July 2022 and April 2023 with the complaint of prolapse and have uterine or vaginal cuff prolapse due to a central defect or cystocele due to an anterior compartment defect and are indicated for surgery will be included in the study.The surgeries will be performed laparoscopically after obtaining their written consent.

The Technique;

  1. The anterior promontory and the presacral area are dissected to expose the anterior longitudinal ligament.
  2. Dissection from this region, extension of the right sacrouter ligament from the lateral to the vaginal cuff or retrocervical region as well as visualization of the right ureter, isolation of the right sacrouterine ligament.
  3. Dissection of the vesicovaginal space by cutting the vesicouterine peritoneum and eradication of the bladder. Lower limit of anterior compartment dissection; Exposing the puboservicovaginal fascia sufficiently to repair the anterior defect and exposing the defect.
  4. Dissection of the Yabuki space to control the entrance of the ureters into the bladder during anterior compartment dissection.
  5. Performing a hysterectomy and suturing the vaginal cup if additional gynecological indications are present. (in women with a uterus).
  6. Repairing the defective pubocervico-vaginal fascia using 2.0 prolene for an anterior compartment defect and suturing this fascia to the cervical ring or sacrouterine ligaments in the vaginal cuff using 2.0 prolene.
  7. Attaining the sacral promontory with two strong sutures starting from the vaginal cuff or cervix using 1.0 prolene and continuous circular sutures along the right sacrouterine ligament while using the same suture.
  8. After passing 1 strong suture through the anterior longitudinal ligament, the same suture will be continued along the right sacrouterine ligament in a continuous and circular manner.
  9. Knotting where the suture begins to create sufficient tension (maintaining the vaginal cuff level at -2) (The sacrocolpopexy technique: transforming the sacrouterine ligament into a rope with an insoluble suture material).
  10. Finally, providing peritonization with 2.0 vicryl and, if indicated, culdoplasty.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34660
        • Recruiting
        • Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Childrens Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients older than 30 years and younger than 80 years old
  • Patients who provided written consent for this surgical procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot obtain anesthesia approval for laparoscopic surgery
  • Patients with asymptomatic pelvic organ prolapse
  • Patients with active pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Patients who have a confirmed or suspected pregnancy or malignancy
  • Patients who have an unexplored abnormal cervical-uterine cytology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Meshless Approach
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy in central or anterior compartment prolapse.
Meshless sacrocolpopexy: laparoscopic approach to central and anterior compartment prolapse

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog Scale
Time Frame: 6 months after the operation
Pain Scale of 0 to 10, aiming that the operation itself leaves no pain.
6 months after the operation
POP-Q classification
Time Frame: 6 months after the operation
examination of pelvis organs, aiming that the vaginal cuff stays at -2 level and no recur.
6 months after the operation
PQOL
Time Frame: 6 months after the operation
Aiming to see the increased quality of life by the questionnaire which is given preoperatively and postoperative 6th month.
6 months after the operation
FSFI
Time Frame: 6 months after the operation
Aiming to see the increased quality of sexual life by the questionnaire which is given preoperatively and postoperative 6th month.
6 months after the operation
Urinary Incontinance
Time Frame: 6 months after the operation
Questioning and examining patient after surgery related to urinary incontinancy complaint, and evaluating the incontinancy state with questionnaires of Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
6 months after the operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 15, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 84/2022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopy

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Meshless Sacrocolpopexy Technique

Subscribe