Optimizing Endobronchial Ultrasound Sampling for Molecular Markers for NSCLC (OPTIMAL)

OPTimizing Endobronchial Ultrasound Sampling In Suspected Non Small Cell Lung Cancer for Molecular Markers : A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled TriaL

In this monocentric randomized controlled trial, 120 potential non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for which tissue diagnosis and material for next generation sequencing (NGS) is required for clinical management will be approached the day of their endobronchial ultrasound to participate in the study. They will be randomized to 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node and will all undergo liquid biopsy. The co-primary outcomes are 1)the rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node and 2)the percentage of patients for which liquid biopsy allows to identify clinically pertinent findings not available from tissue biopsy

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V4G5
        • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Quebec

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected or confirmed NSCLC requiring tissue sample for NGS testing to guide clinical management
  • Presence of at least 2 targets accessible by EBUS or EUS suspicious of malignancy (primary tumor, lymph node > 10mm or with Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) > 2.5)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other modality then EBUS judged preferable by treating physician to obtain tumoral tissue for NGS testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 2 passes per target on EBUS
Two or three passes per lymph node
Experimental: 3 passes per target on EBUS
Two or three passes per lymph node

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node
Time Frame: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%. More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
Percentage of patients for which liquid biopsy allowed to identify genetic alterations not identified from tissue biopsy
Time Frame: At 1 month
A case for which liquid biopsy NGS testing allows to identify a genetic alteration not identified by matched tissue biopsy (tissue inadequate, insufficient for molecular testing or adequate but genetic alteration not found) will be considered a case for which liquid biopsy provided additional clinical findings
At 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/patient
Time Frame: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%. More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/sampling scheme
Time Frame: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%. More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc Fortin, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Endobronchial ultrasound

Subscribe