- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05560776
Optimizing Endobronchial Ultrasound Sampling for Molecular Markers for NSCLC (OPTIMAL)
January 23, 2026 updated by: Marc Fortin, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
OPTimizing Endobronchial Ultrasound Sampling In Suspected Non Small Cell Lung Cancer for Molecular Markers : A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled TriaL
In this monocentric randomized controlled trial, 120 potential non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for which tissue diagnosis and material for next generation sequencing (NGS) is required for clinical management will be approached the day of their endobronchial ultrasound to participate in the study.
They will be randomized to 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node and will all undergo liquid biopsy.
The co-primary outcomes are 1)the rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node and 2)the percentage of patients for which liquid biopsy allows to identify clinically pertinent findings not available from tissue biopsy
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
120
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V4G5
- Institut universitaire de cardiologie et pneumologie de Québec
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Suspected or confirmed NSCLC requiring tissue sample for NGS testing to guide clinical management
- Presence of at least 2 targets accessible by EBUS or EUS suspicious of malignancy (primary tumor, lymph node > 10mm or with Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) > 2.5)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other modality then EBUS judged preferable by treating physician to obtain tumoral tissue for NGS testing
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 2 passes per target on EBUS
|
Two or three passes per lymph node
|
|
Experimental: 3 passes per target on EBUS
|
Two or three passes per lymph node
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node
Time Frame: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
|
Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%.
More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.
|
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
|
|
Percentage of patients for which liquid biopsy allowed to identify genetic alterations not identified from tissue biopsy
Time Frame: At 1 month
|
A case for which liquid biopsy NGS testing allows to identify a genetic alteration not identified by matched tissue biopsy (tissue inadequate, insufficient for molecular testing or adequate but genetic alteration not found) will be considered a case for which liquid biopsy provided additional clinical findings
|
At 1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/patient
Time Frame: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
|
Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%.
More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.
|
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
|
|
Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/sampling scheme
Time Frame: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
|
Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%.
More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.
|
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marc Fortin, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 27, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
September 29, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 26, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 23, 2026
Last Verified
January 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Lung Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
- Thoracic Neoplasms
- Neoplastic Processes
- Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
- Bronchial Neoplasms
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Lung Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Neoplastic Cells, Circulating
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023-3850
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.