Stem Cells for the Treatment of Pouchitis

October 10, 2022 updated by: Amy Lightner, The Cleveland Clinic

A Phase I Study of Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) for the Treatment of Medically Refractory Pouchitis

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and feasibility of using allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to treat people with medically refractory Pouchitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) remains the procedure of choice for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC). IPAA allows at-risk tissue to be removed with restoration of intestinal continuity while maintaining favorable long-term functional outcomes and quality of life.

While less than 30% of patients experience short-term postoperative morbidity following IPAA, up to 15% of pouches will ultimately fail due to technical or inflammatory complications, the majority of which manifest as a fistula from the pouch to the perianal or vaginal locations. After anastomotic leak, the second leading cause of pouch fistulas is the development of Crohn's disease of the pouch. While the majority of pouches are constructed for CUC, up to 25% will end up having a change in diagnosis to CD which manifests as refractor pouchitis, strictures of the proximal small bowel, or most often as peripouch fistulas. Pouch failure due to refractory pouchitis are notoriously difficult to treat, and reconstructive pouch surgery or transanal repairs are often not offered due to suspicion of recurrent pouchitis following pouch reconstruction. The reality is that patients with refractory pouchitis will end up with a major reconstructive transabdominal operation in a select few for attempt at pouch salvage, or, most likely, a permanent end ileostomy after pouch excision. This can be a devastating outcome in some patients as it impacts body image and quality of life.

Similar to refractory pouchitis, Crohn's related perianal and rectovaginal fistula are other phenotypes of inflammatory bowel disease that are also notoriously difficult to treat with conventional medical and surgical options. Despite an ever expanding repertoire of biologic therapy and surgical intervention, sustained healing rates are less than 30%. This has driven investigators to search for alternative approaches, and in 2003 investigators reported successful healing of a refractory Crohn's rectovaginal fistula following injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Following this success, several phase I, II, and III trials designed to study the safety and efficacy of MSCs for perianal CD, all of which have reported encouraging results with superior efficacy compared to conventional medical and surgical therapies. Over 300 perianal CD patients have now been treated without increase in adverse events and no risk of incontinence.

Given the high safety profile, and substantial success in treating perianal CD, the investigators are using a GMP grade allogeneic adipose derived MSCs to establish safety and secondarily monitor for healing in patients with medically refractory pouchitis. This trial will use allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to produce regenerative signals which alter the ileal pouch microbiome and local inflammatory mileau. Patients with CD of the pouch suffer chronic immunosuppression and surgical intervention and desperately need an improved therapeutic. The research aims to address the root cause of this inflammation, especially the interactions of the intestinal microbiome and host immune response through a novel therapeutic approach. The specific rationale for MSCs in medical refractory pouchitis is based opon 1) their anti-inflammatory properties; 2) published experience of MSC in this condition and perianal Crohn's fistula demonstrating efficacy and safety; 3) existence of cGMP methods for their isolation and growth.

The study will enroll adult patients with medically refractory pouchitis, whose next option in the treatment plan would be major reconstructive abdominal surgery or pouch excision with a permanent end ileostomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women 18-75 years of age
  2. Residents of the United States
  3. Medically refractory pouchitis defined as lack of response to antibiotics, immunomodulators, and/or biologics
  4. Concurrent therapies with corticosteroids, 5-ASA drugs, thiopurines, MTX, antibiotics, anti-TNF therapy, anti-integrin and anti-interleukin are permitted if have been on them for at least 2 months prior to study enrollment without change
  5. No malignant or premalignant intestinal condition, ruled out on colonoscopy within 90 days of MSC delivery
  6. Ability to comply with protocol
  7. Competent and able to provide written informed consent
  8. Must have failed or have a contraindication to standard medical therapy including anti-TNF, anti-interleukin, or anti-integrin agent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to give informed consent
  2. Clinically significant medical conditions within the six months before administration of MSCs: e.g. myocardial infarction, active angina, congestive heart failure or other conditions that would, in the opinion of the investigators, compromise the safety of the patient
  3. Specific exclusions:

    • HIV
    • Hepatitis B or C
    • Abnormal CBC at screening
    • Abnormal AST or ALT at screening
  4. History of cancer including melanoma (with the exception of localized skin cancers) within 5 years of study enrollment
  5. Investigational drug use within thirty (30) days of baseline
  6. Pregnant or breastfeeding
  7. Multifocal proximal small bowel involvement which resembles Crohn's of the small bowel
  8. Evidence of pelvic sepsis and pelvic penetrating fistulizing disease
  9. Patients with intestinal diversion above the level of the pouch
  10. Neoplasia of pouch
  11. Change in medical regimen for pouchitis in the two months prior to study enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Arm
Submucosal endoscopic injection of 60 million allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into ileal pouch at baseline and possibly again after 3 months if not completely healed.
Endoscopic injection of allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to the ileal pouch.
Other Names:
  • Allogeneic Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC injection
Number of adverse events that occur throughout the study.
Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC injection
Healing
Time Frame: Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
PDAI endoscopic activity less than or equal to 1, Clinical PDAI score less than or equal to 2, and total PDAI less than or equal to 4
Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endoscopic Remission
Time Frame: Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
PDAI endoscopic activity less than or equal to 1 Mayo Endoscopic score less than or equal to 1, defined as the absence of friability or ulceration
Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
Clinical Remission
Time Frame: Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
Clinical PDAI score less than or equal to 2 MDPAI score less than or equal to 4
Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
Endoscopic Improvement
Time Frame: Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
Reduction in the endoscopic PDAI score, but still greater than 1 Reduction in the Mayo endoscopic score, but still greater than 1 Reduction in endoscopic MPDAI score by 2 or more points
Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
Clinical Improvement
Time Frame: Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
Reduction in the clinical PDAI score of 2 or more points Reduction in the Clinical MPDAI score of 2 or more points Decrease in 24-hour stool frequency
Change from Baseline over 12 months after the MSC Injection
Partial Clinical Healing measured with the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index No No response
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after MSC injection
No improvement in the PDAI overall, endoscopic, or clinical scores No decrease in Mayo endoscopic severity score No decrease in 24 hour stool frequency
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after MSC injection
Partial Clinical Healing
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after MSC injection
Decrease in C-reactive protein serum levels by greater than 50%
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after MSC injection
Partial Clinical Healing
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after MSC injection
Decreased mucosal ulceration on pouchoscopy
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after MSC injection
Partial Clinical Healing
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after MSC injection
Improved healing on endoscopic biopsy or surgical pathology as compared to pre-MSC delivery endoscopic biopsies.
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after MSC injection
Assess for alloimmune response
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 month, 12 month after MSC injection
Measure HLA Class B Antibody Screening
Baseline, 1 month, 3 month, 12 month after MSC injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy L Lightner, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clinical Trials on Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

3
Subscribe