Examining the Effectiveness of EAL (EAL)

December 2, 2025 updated by: Margaret McKinnon, McMaster University

Examining the Effectiveness of Equine Assisted Learning for Trauma-exposed Public Safety Personnel

This quasi-experiment will evaluate the effectiveness of Equine Assisted Learning for reducing symptoms associated with trauma exposure among public safety personnel (e.g., fire fighters, police, paramedics, etc.).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of the proposed project is to investigate the effectiveness of Equine Assisted Learning (EAL) for reducing symptoms associated with trauma exposure among public safety personnel. EAL is an intervention in which mental health clinicians and equine specialists work together with clients to address a learning goal via unmounted interaction with a horse. Recent literature indicates that EAL shows promise in addressing a range of mental health diagnoses among a variety of populations, including military and Royal Canadian Mounted Police veterans with PTSD. The EAL intervention will be delivered at Cartier Farms in Spruce Home, Saskatchewan. Research components of this study will be conducted virtually via Zoom.

The investigators will employ a quasi-experimental design with pre-post and follow-up testing. Participants will be assigned one of two groups based on the time that they complete their initial baseline interview: (1) the intervention group will receive the EAL intervention for 8 weeks, while (2) the waitlist control condition will not receive this treatment for the same amount of time. Data on trauma exposure symptom severity will be collected from all participants prior to the start of the the study (baseline), again 8 weeks later (post), and then a final time 3 months later (follow-up). The two conditions will then be compared to determine whether there are differences in trauma exposure symptom severity between groups. To obtain a sufficient sample size while also running appropriately sized interventions of 6-10 participants per session, the researchers will conduct 4-6 rounds of group assignment. All individuals in the waitlist control condition will be offered EAL following their completion of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Saskatchewan
      • Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada, S6V5R2
        • Cartier Farms

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. English-speaking adults;
  2. Currently or previously employed as public safety personnel (e.g., police officer, fire fighter, paramedic, healthcare worker, emergency dispatcher, correctional officer);
  3. Reside in Saskatchewan;
  4. Meet diagnostic criteria for having experienced a Criterion A traumatic event;
  5. Able to provide written informed consent;
  6. Have access to a smart phone, tablet, or computer with a working microphone and camera; and
  7. Have access to consistent and reliable internet.

Exclusion:

  1. Meet/met current/past diagnostic criteria for several psychiatric, neurodevelopmental, and neurological conditions;
  2. History of severe head trauma with loss of consciousness or history of traumatic brain injury;
  3. Have previously completed at least half of the EAL curriculum at Cartier Farms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Equine Assisted Learning group
Participants in this group will receive 16 sessions of Equine Assisted Learning (EAL), facilitated by a trained clinician at Cartier Farms.
EAL is an intervention in which mental health clinicians and equine specialists work together with clients to address a learning goal via unmounted interaction with a horse. It is 16 sessions in length, at a rate of two sessions per week.
Other Names:
  • EAL
No Intervention: Waitlist control group
Participants in the waitlist control group will not receive EAL for the duration of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD symptomatology
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (structured interview) at pre, post, and follow-up.
20 weeks
PTSD symptomatology
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 80 with higher scores denoting higher PTSD symptomatology.
20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotion regulation
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 36 and 180 with higher scores denoting poorer emotion regulation.
20 weeks
Dissociation
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Multiscale Dissociation Index at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 120 with higher scores denoting higher dissociative symptomatology.
20 weeks
Moral injury
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Moral Injury Assessment - Public Safety Personnel at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 17 and 102 with higher scores denoting higher moral injury.
20 weeks
Body awareness
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness - Version 2 at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 185 with higher scores denoting greater body awareness.
20 weeks
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 21 with higher scores denoting poorer sleep quality.
20 weeks
Health complaints
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Physical Symptoms Questionnaire at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 33 with higher scores denoting more health complaints.
20 weeks
Mental health symptomatology
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (structured interview) at pre, post, and follow-up.
20 weeks
Depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 42 with higher scores denoting higher depression, anxiety, and/or stress symptomatology.
20 weeks
Alcohol use disorder symptomatology
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 40 with higher scores denoting higher AUD symptomatology.
20 weeks
Cannabis use disorder symptomatology
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 32 with higher scores denoting higher CUD symptomatology.
20 weeks
Substance use disorder symptomatology
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Drug Use Disorder Identification Test at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 44 with higher scores denoting higher SUD symptomatology.
20 weeks
Resilience
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Brief Resilience Scale at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 6 and 30 with higher scores denoting higher resilience.
20 weeks
Self-compassion
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Self Compassion Scale at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 26 and 130 with higher scores denoting higher self-compassion.
20 weeks
Health and disability
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 12 at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 100 with higher scores denoting greater disability.
20 weeks
Disability
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the Sheehan Disability Scale at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 44 with higher scores denoting greater disability.
20 weeks
Work functioning and productivity
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on Lam's Employment and Productivity Scale at pre, post, and follow-up. Scores can range between 0 and 28 with higher scores denoting more severe work impairment.
20 weeks
Substance involvement
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in performance on the World Health Organization's Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Test at pre, post, and follow-up. Each question on the ASSIST has a checklist set of responses to choose from to measure substances used in the past, and each response from questions 2 to 7 has a numerical score. Higher scores indicate more significant substance involvement.
20 weeks
Exposure to childhood trauma
Time Frame: Completed once at baseline
Baseline description of trauma experienced in childhood based on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, which is a 28-item checklist where more endorsed traumatic experiences indicates more exposure to childhood trauma.
Completed once at baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in heart rate variability over time, as measured by a Garmin VivoActive 4 smartwatch.
20 weeks
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Changes in sleep quality over time, as measured by a Garmin VivoActive 4 smartwatch.
20 weeks
Experience in EAL
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Participant experience in EAL as measured by a semi-structured, qualitative interview.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Margaret McKinnon, PhD, CPsych, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Equine Assisted Learning

Subscribe