No Cases of Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage (d-ICH) Among Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) on Oral Anticoagulation Therapy

November 1, 2022 updated by: Umeå University

Abstract Purpose Patients with anticoagulation therapy has a higher risk of developing traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (tICH). Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage (d-ICH) is a rarer clinical manifestation; however, the incidence varies from 0-9,6 % in other studies. Some studies have also questioned the clinical relevance of d-ICH, since the mortality and the need of neurosurgical intervention is reported to be very low. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of d-ICH at Sundsvall Regional Hospital.

Methods A retrospective observational study of patients with mTBI and oral anticoagulation therapy. Data from medical records and radiology registry in Sundsvall hospital for 29 months during 2018-2020 in Sundsvall identified 249 patients with an initial negative CT scan who performed a follow-up CT scan. Outcome measure was incidence of d-ICH.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Method This is a retrospective observational study investing the incidence of d-ICH at Sundsvall Regional Hospital. Data was collected from 2018-01-01 - 2020-05-30, and all data collection followed a predetermined protocol. Data was collected by two persons.

Starting from the hospital's radiology registry, all CT-scan referrals from emergency departments surgical section and acute surgical ward with a possible traumatic brain injury was read. Hereafter patients' journals were used to retrieve mechanism of injury, pre-injury medications, and arrival status.

TBI are typically classified after level of consciousness, internationally often measures in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (3). At Sundsvall Regional Hospital, RLS (Reaction Level Scale) is more commonly used, hence it was used in data collection. However, in most cases patients' mental status was only commented as "unaffected" without any use of neither GCS nor RLS. In statistical analysis, we only recorded RLS where it was in clear print and choose not to translate "unaffected" into RLS 1. RLS 1 and GCS 15 are comparable, and GCS 14 and RLS2 are also comparable. mTBI is classified by Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee's guidelines as a GCS 14 after head trauma, or GCS 15 after head trauma in combination with loss of consciousness, repeated vomiting, posttraumatic seizures, focal neurological deficits, signs of skull fracture, intracranial shunts, antithrombotic treatment, or antiplatelet treatment in combination with age over 65.

Inclusion criteria was mTBI and pre-injury anticoagulation or SGA therapy. In the initial data collection, all patients with mTBI regardless of antitrombotic therapy status were included for comparison for another study. Exclusion criteria was high energy trauma, age <18 years, concealed journals, spontaneous hemorrhage, RLS ≥3 (Figure 1). Due to the lack of control CT, patients on solely ASA or LMWH was also excluded due to former local clinical guidelines.

High energy trauma was excluded from this study, due to the heterogenous variety of injuries and often multiple organ injuries. High energy trauma was defined as any traffic accident or fall > 3 meters, or other traumas that required acute trauma care at the emergency trauma room.

tICH was subcategorized into subdural hemorrhage (SDH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), epidural hemorrhage or others. Age and gender were collected as demographic data. Severity of head trauma, treatment with anticoagulation therapy (DOAC/VKA/LMWH/other) and/or antiplatelet therapy (ASA/Clopidogrel/Ticagrelor/other) were noted. Antithrombotic therapy was used as an overall term compromising both anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment. The predominant SGA used for single therapy in Sweden is Clopidogrel, and no participants in this study had single therapy with Ticagrelor. SGA is therefore synonymous with Clopidogrel in this study.

Unclear formulations, positive findings or uncertain findings in the initial radiology assessment was held to a second opinion by an experienced neuroradiologist. A total of 3 cases (1,2 %) were held to a second opinion assessment (Table 1).

Statistics Statistical analysis was executed using Microsoft Excel® version 2108 for Microsoft Windows®. Demographic data were presented as means and standard deviations (SD), or as counts and percentage where appropriate.

The sample size was set to a period of 29 months from January 2018 to May 2020, by which we estimated by the study supervisors to match comparable studies in the field, thus no power calculation prior to study start was done.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

249

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sundsvall, Sweden
        • Sundsvall Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a retrospective observational study investing the incidence of d-ICH at Sundsvall Regional Hospital. Data was collected from 2018-01-01 - 2020-05-30, and all data collection followed a predetermined protocol. Data was collected by two persons.

Starting from the hospital's radiology registry, all CT-scan referrals from emergency departments surgical section and acute surgical ward with a possible traumatic brain injury was read. Hereafter patients' journals were used to retrieve mechanism of injury, pre-injury medications, and arrival status.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria was mTBI and pre-injury anticoagulation or SGA therapy. In the initial data collection, all patients with mTBI regardless of antitrombotic therapy status were included for comparison for another study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria was high energy trauma, age <18 years, concealed journals, spontaneous hemorrhage, RLS ≥3 (Figure 1). Due to the lack of control CT, patients on solely ASA or LMWH was also excluded due to former local clinical guidelines.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with an delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
A total of 249 control CTs was performed, where the initial CT was normal regarding tICH. In the initial assessments 1 case of d-ICH (0,41%) was found, but after second opinion this case (case 1, Table 1) was regarded as a pictorial artefact (Table 1). Hence, no d-ICH was found.
no intervention, only observational retrospective study
Patients without an delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
A total of 249 control CTs was performed, where the initial CT was normal regarding tICH. In the initial assessments 1 case of d-ICH (0,41%) was found, but after second opinion this case (case 1, Table 1) was regarded as a pictorial artefact (Table 1). Hence, no d-ICH was found.
no intervention, only observational retrospective study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: 6 hours
Inclusion criteria was mTBI and pre-injury anticoagulation or SGA therapy. A secondary CT scan was performed 6 hours later, to detect a delayed intracranial hemorrhage.
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yücel Cengiz, Ph.D. M.D., Umea University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on no intervention, only observational retrospective study

3
Subscribe