Amphetamine Induced Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome

November 3, 2022 updated by: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center

High Incidence of Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Associated With Amphetamine Use in the Burn Population

Methamphetamine and amphetamine has various cardiovascular and central nervous system effects. Long-term use is associated with many adverse health effects including cardiomyopathy, hemorrhagic, and ischemic stroke. Death is usually caused by cardiovascular collapse and while amphetamine abuse has been considered as a potential cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome, the reports are usually anecdotal. This investigation considers reviewing individuals with few to zero medical conditions who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and are methamphetamine positive

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methamphetamine and amphetamine has various cardiovascular and central nervous system effects. Initially prescribed in the 1930s for respiratory ailments such as asthma, current clinical indications of amphetamine range from treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder to narcolepsy. The mechanism of action is primarily potentiation of release of monoamine neurotransmitters, mainly dopamine and norepinephrine, from presynaptic nerve endings into the synaptic space, in addition to attenuation of monoamine metabolism by inhibiting monoamine oxidase. This in turn leads to an increase in sympathetic tone by alpha and beta adrenergic receptor activation, resulting in elevations in heart rate, respiratory rate, and vascular tone. Long-term use is associated with many adverse health effects including cardiomyopathy, hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Other long-term associations include increased violent behavior, documented increased motor vehicle accidents, and clandestine manufacturing of the drug.

Methamphetamine has also been associated with deleterious effects on society as a whole; it is credited as a cause of increase in rates of crime, abuse, and unemployment, and associated with great economic burden. A significant portion of healthcare resources consumed are rooted in the emergency department, particularly in trauma. Studies previously performed have demonstrated that methamphetamine use among patients that present to trauma centers has been continually increasing. Death is usually caused by cardiovascular collapse and while amphetamine abuse has been considered as a potential cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome, the reports are usually anecdotal. This investigation considers reviewing individuals with few to zero medical conditions who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and are methamphetamine positive

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Colton, California, United States, 92324
        • Arrowhead Regional Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study was completed at Arrowhead Regional Medical Center County Burn Center in Colton, California, which operates as the only burn center for San Bernardino, Inyo, Mono and Riverside Counties. ARMC covers one of the largest geographical areas in the United States. Due to the high prevalence of methamphetamine use, this location sees a high incidence of burn patients who either use amphetamine or are the result of methamphetamine lab explosions.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Total body surface area burns between 20% and 60% admitted to the burn unit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Burns outside of the inclusion ratio

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Positive for Amphetamine
Patients admitted to the burn unit that are positive for amphetamine
No Intervention
Negative for Amphetamine
Patients admitted to the burn unit that are negative for amphetamine
No Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inhalation Injury
Time Frame: 24 hours
Documentation on admission of inhalation injury as defined by burned nasal hairs, burned facial skin, and carbonaceous sputum after admission to the hospital within the first 24 hours.
24 hours
Total Burn Surface Area
Time Frame: 24 hours
The total burn surface area of the patient on arrival to the hospital assessed within the first 24 hours. With respect to the total burn surface area recorded only 2nd degree burns will be considered as defined as burns that affect the epidermis and dermis.
24 hours
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 180 days
The total length of hospitalization of individuals with burns and acute respiratory distress syndrome with a max of 180 days from admission.
180 days
Stroke Volume
Time Frame: Collected in the first 5 days after admission
Measurement of cardiovascular parameter (stroke volume) of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and total burn surface area between 20%-60% in the first 5 days of admission to the hospital.
Collected in the first 5 days after admission
Cardiac Output
Time Frame: Collected in the first 5 days after admission
Measurement of cardiovascular parameter (cardiac output) of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and total burn surface area between 20%-60% in the first 5 days of admission to the hospital.
Collected in the first 5 days after admission
Central Venous Pressure
Time Frame: Collected in the first 5 days after admission
Measurement of cardiovascular parameter (central venous pressure) of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and total burn surface area between 20%-60% in the first 5 days of admission to the hospital.
Collected in the first 5 days after admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Aldin Malkoc, MD, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: David T Wong, MD, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Clinical Trials on Difference in development of Acute Lung Injury in Amphetamine positive and negative patients

Subscribe