Treatment of Early Supraglottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Advance Technologies (SUPRA-QoL)

November 3, 2022 updated by: Professor Maximilien Gourdin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dinant Godinne - UCL Namur

Treatment of Supraglottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Advance Technologies: Observational Evaluation of Quality of Life, Oncological Outcomes, Functional Outcomes and Economical Resources

In this project, the investigators will realize an observational, prospective, multicentric and international clinical trial, to objectively compare patients with SSCC according to 3 arms of treatment:

  • Arm 1: Radiotherapy ± chemotherapy
  • Arm 2: Trans-oral Laser Microsurgery (TLM)
  • Arm 3: Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (TORS)

The main goal is to evaluate the efficacy of each treatment with four classes of outcomes:

  • The quality of life (QoL) before and after each treatment option, using validated questionnaires
  • Oncological outcomes
  • Functional outcomes
  • Economical Resources

The population will include cT1-T2 /cN0-N1/M0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma.

The primary outcome is a Clinical Dysphagia QoL evaluation assessed by the MD Anderson Dysphagia questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include others QoL evaluation, oncological and functional measures and cost parameters. The sample size needs to reach 36 patients per arm (total 108).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

108

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population will include cT1-T2 /cN0-N1/M0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of SSCC (with histological confirmation)

    • cT1-T2 / cN0-N1/ M0 according to 8th TNM classification (UICC/AJCC)
    • WITH a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board decision according to the NCCN or European guidelines
  • Diagnostic imaging (Head and neck and pulmonary CT or PET/CT, +/- IRM if needed) realized within 1 month before the study inclusion
  • ≥ 18 years old and able to provide an informed consent
  • ECOG/WHO performance status ≤ 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Previous radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy treatment of the head and neck region
  • Previous history of head and neck cancer within 5 years
  • Prior invasive malignant disease unless disease-free for at least 5 years or more, with exception of non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Non-supraglottic or unknown primary site
  • Clinical and radiological signs of nodal extracapsular extension
  • Significant trismus (maximum inter-incisal opening ≤ 35 mm)
  • Pre-existing dysphagia not related to the cancer or the biopsy (from neurological disorders for example)
  • Unable or unwilling to complete Quality of Life questionnaires
  • Serious medical comorbidities or contraindication for surgery and/or radiation
  • Pregnancy and lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
TORS
Patients operated by Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (TORS)
  • Arm 1: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
  • Arm 2: Trans-oral Laser Microsurgery (TLM)
  • Arm 3: Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (TORS)
Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • TLM
TLM
Patients operated by Trans-oral Laser Microsurgery (TLM)
  • Arm 1: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
  • Arm 2: Trans-oral Laser Microsurgery (TLM)
  • Arm 3: Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (TORS)
Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • TLM
IMRT
Patients treated by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
  • Arm 1: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
  • Arm 2: Trans-oral Laser Microsurgery (TLM)
  • Arm 3: Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (TORS)
Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • TLM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Dysphagia QoL evaluation using MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI)
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical Dysphagia QoL evaluation after treatment will be assessed using MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI). MDADI consists of 20 items pooled in 4 subscales: the global scale (1 item); the functional scale (5 items); the physical scale (8 items); and the emotional scale (6 items). All items are scored on a 5-point scale (1-5), where "1" corresponds to "total agreement" and "5" to "total disagreement." All except 2 items were scored such that higher scores indicated higher functioning. Responses on all domains were summed to calculate the total score (MDADI-T). The maximum score is 100, indicating high functioning, and the minimum score is 20, indicating poor functioning.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Measures with the validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline (before treatment), 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months
QoL will be evaluated with the validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire It is composed on five functional scales (physical, performance, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptoms scale (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale and 6 simple items for assessment of symptoms or additional problems (dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, financial difficulties, constipation and diarrhea). All of the scale and single item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Regarding functional and overall health status scales, higher scores relate to better quality of life; however, for the scales of symptoms, higher scores correspond to the higher presence of this symptom and, consequently, the worse quality of life.
baseline (before treatment), 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months
Quality of Life Measures with the validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) H&N43 questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline (before treatment), 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months
QoL will be evaluated with the validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) H&N43 questionnaire It comprises 43 questions about symptoms and side effects of treatment, social function, body image and sexuality. It incorporates 12 symptom scales (pain, swallowing, problems with teeth, dry month and sticky saliva, problems with senses, speech, body image, social eating, sexuality, problems with shoulder, skin problems and fear of progression) and 7 simple items (problems opening mouth, coughing, social contact, swelling in the neck, weight loss, problem with wound healing and neurological problems). All of the scales and the single item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
baseline (before treatment), 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months
Oncological Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Overall survival (%)
1 and 2 years
Oncological outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Disease specific survival (%)
1 and 2 years
Oncological Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Disease-free survival (%)
1 and 2 years
Oncological Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Loco-regional recurrence rate (%)
1 and 2 years
Oncological Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Distant recurrence rate (%)
1 and 2 years
Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: baseline (before treatment), 1 - 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months after treatment
Swallowing function by FEES evaluation (Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing) objectively evaluated by the Penetration-aspiration Scale (PAS) The PAS is an 8-point scale that rates the degree of airway invasion. Score of 1 is normal, score between 2-5 represent laryngeal penetration and scores up to 6 indicate airway aspiration.
baseline (before treatment), 1 - 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months after treatment
Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: baseline (before treatment), 1 - 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months after treatment
Weight (Kilogrammes)
baseline (before treatment), 1 - 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months after treatment
Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: baseline (before treatment), 1 - 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months after treatment
CTC-AE Score for early and late complication The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE) is a descriptive terminology which was published by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as part of an ongoing effort to standardize adverse events (AE) reporting within oncology. AE are graded according to an ordinal scale where 1 represents asymptomatic or mild symptoms and 5 represents death from the AE. In between, 2 is moderate, 3 is severe, and 4 is life-threatening. E.g., with regard to dysphagia, the CTCAE uses the descriptive terminology listed in Table 1, columns 1 and 2. CTCAE dysphagia grades are based on symptoms, diet, and tube dependency. This scale will be filled in by the physician.
baseline (before treatment), 1 - 3 - 6 - 9 - 12 - 18 - 24 months after treatment
Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Naso-gastric Feeding tube and/or gastrostomy use (duration in days)
1 and 2 years
Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Tracheostomy use (duration in days)
1 and 2 years
Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years
Need of hospitalization (yes or no; if yes, duration in days)
1 and 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Supraglottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on TORS

Subscribe